nope. Never. And I know other women who have never been that drunk. Not an excuse for what happened, though, but your blanket statement is incorrect. |
Alcohol and drugs often play a huge part in criminal behavior. |
Not rape. Being a violent piece of shit woman hating human makes you a rapist, not alcohol. |
NP... yes, these two factors can play a role. People who are drunk and/or high can commit all kinds of violent acts that they wouldn't do when sober. I'm sure many here have done some stupid things while drunk and/or high that they wouldn't have done when sober, maybe even some illegal things. No, I'm not talking about rape, but maybe something like driving drunk (at worst), or drunk dialing an ex (at best).... things you know are bad/wrong/stupid when sober. Alcohol and drugs affect your decision making abilities. Never an excuse though. But, bad things can happen when you are that drunk - to you or to someone else. |
Yes, I think he probably roofied her too with something that can't be traced. Athletes are more aware of substances that can be manipulated for different effects but are untraceable. I believe her. I think she probably took a shot or two, and was nursing a beer or other drink that he spiked the shit out of, forced her to drink more, and then she called her boyfriend but was totally incoherent, and then lost consiousness, at which point he led her behind a dumpster and put needles and dirt inside of her. I hope he gets destroyed in prison. |
This makes about as much sense as requiring women to wear burqas. By this logic, one should never leave the house, or even their bed, because of all the dangers out there. I was raped at a college party. I had one drink, which turned out to be grain alcohol - something I'd never heard of at the time. Unfortunately, I did not black out; I simply couldn't move. The rapist removed one leg of my pants and one leg of the tights I was wearing underneath them. That took some very deliberate effort, yet you'd put the focus on MY actions. I don't even have words to describe how this line of thinking disgusts me. |
Sorry to hear this. I had a friend with a similar thing happen to her... She was wearing her favorite pair of jeans that she has had for years... They were worn soft at the thighs so the fabric was really thin. He raped her THROUGH HER JEANS. Ripped a hole with his hands on the fabric by her upper inner thigh, pushed aside her underwear, and went to town. She was able to knock him off of her, but was still raped and completely traumatized. |
I think that the fact that she was totally unconscious when they found her and that he ran away (i.e., knew he was doing something wrong) when the grad students showed up pushes this into clear rape territory. However, I do think the law can operate unfairly in cases where both parties were blackout drunk. If a woman appeared to be consenting but was blackout drunk, it is legally rape because she was too drunk to consent. But the law expects the blackout drunk man to realize that her consent isn't real and to be responsible for his actions while equally as drunk. I'm not saying being drunk should be an excuse for rape, but there is something inconsistent about saying that if a woman is blackout drunk and consents to sex it is actually rape, but treating the man the same way regardless of whether he was blackout drunk or not. I don't know what the answer is, but I do think there is a gray area there. However, as I said, I think it was pretty black-and-white in the Stanford case, at least based on what I've read about it. |
| Undoubtedly some of the people in this thread would argue she really shouldn't have been wearing jeans so thin in the thighs while out in public. And maybe the guy drank before he ripped her jeans and raped her. |
I do think the law can be challenging with both parties are blackout drunk, but that wasn't the case here, as you say. So it's pretty insulting to come up with all of these scenarios in which he might not have been at fault. He was. He is going to jail, and not for long enough. |
Sure, but if your son murders someone, you wouldn't counsel him to drink less in the future. You'd tell him to stop fucking murdering people. |
| Those swedish grad students who found her and tackled him to call the cops are heros. guardian angels. |
Let me make another comparison for you. Woman is married to an abusive partner. Is she to be blamed for the abuse? No. Do we advise her to get out of a potentially dangerous situation. Yes. Being as smart as possible safety-wise is not the same as assigning blame. |
I would do both! |
Now that's not a true statement, at all. Some of us were taught about the abuse of alcohol by our responsible parents. If my child enters college and abuse alcohol, it will not be because parents did not have responsible conversations regarding the effects of this legal drug. |