That Brock Allen Turner is a dirtbag

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


+1

WTAF


Both things can be true. It’s not open season to rape people. But it happens. So you need to act responsibly and not get blackout drunk which pretty much opens the door to said rape.
Personal responsibility people.


Sober women are raped all the time. Rape is the problem, not drunkenness.


Sigh.

Rape is obviously the problem.

But shouldn’t everyone attempt to mitigate the risk of danger by being aware of their surroundings, maintaining control of their faculties, etc.?


Mitigation or the lack thereof does not confer one less jot of responsibility on the rapist. This kind of talk attempts to shift a modicum of responsiblity to the victim, and I am not here for it. It's gross victim-blaming. "Oh, if only she hadn't [fill in the blank with activity that men do all the time] this wouldn't have happened." Miss me with that.


I think we are talking past each other.

I’m not passing judgment on any victim…ever. The rapist is 100% at fault. Full stop.

I’m talking about girls/women (and presumably men) who haven’t been victimized. I’m suggesting it’s in their best interest to take steps to avoid or mitigate risk.

Some people on this thread sound (imho) unhinged in their belief that nobody should have to take precautions and therefore they don’t…

Some people also sound (imho) unhinged in their binary assessment that anyone who brings up the need to take precautions is a victim-blaming rape apologist.

Fwiw, I’m a boy mom who is not only raising my boys to protect themselves from danger and be gentlemen around their partners, but also to avoid compromising situations. Drugs and alcohol create scenarios where lots of things can go wrong. Unhinged friends and acquaintances can also create scenarios that go sideways.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

Smoke alarms don’t prevent arson. Seat belts don’t prevent car jacking. Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape.

Getting so drunk you lose consciousness is risky, but it’s not a crime. What Turner did was criminal.


Listen you obviously think people shouldn’t do anything to mitigate risk. Like I said, that’s fine for you. Have at it.
Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape. But it definitely mitigates the risk. Why you wouldn’t teach your daughters to mitigate the risk of rape is beyond me.


THEY SHOULDN"T HAVE TO MITIGATE THE RISK. Men should . . . . just not rape. Whether the woman is sober or blackout drunk.


But in this world they do. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
If you want to tell your daughter she shouldn’t have to mitigate the risk, then you do you. But because no matter how many times you screech MEN SHOULDN’T RAPE, they still will. Ignore that at your own peril.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.


The fact that you don't understand how your views go out into the world and shape the social collective viewpoint on rape and victims of rape is horrifying to me, and that doesn't make me fragile. That makes me angry that there are still people out here going to the mats on what victims should do and should't do, calling it MOOT to discuss the rapist because, oh well, he's going to do it anyway, nothing to do here, and you don't see how you contribute to the very victim blaming society that's in play here is disgusting. You. Are. The. Problem. And you're too dumb to see it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.


The fact that you don't understand how your views go out into the world and shape the social collective viewpoint on rape and victims of rape is horrifying to me, and that doesn't make me fragile. That makes me angry that there are still people out here going to the mats on what victims should do and should't do, calling it MOOT to discuss the rapist because, oh well, he's going to do it anyway, nothing to do here, and you don't see how you contribute to the very victim blaming society that's in play here is disgusting. You. Are. The. Problem. And you're too dumb to see it.


DP. No, PP is not the problem or dumb. She's the opposite. You can be as angry as you want on Emily Doe's behalf - that doesn't make her a hero and it doesn't make you right. It just means you're angry.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.


The fact that you don't understand how your views go out into the world and shape the social collective viewpoint on rape and victims of rape is horrifying to me, and that doesn't make me fragile. That makes me angry that there are still people out here going to the mats on what victims should do and should't do, calling it MOOT to discuss the rapist because, oh well, he's going to do it anyway, nothing to do here, and you don't see how you contribute to the very victim blaming society that's in play here is disgusting. You. Are. The. Problem. And you're too dumb to see it.


He IS going to do it anyway. And you’re too dumb to see that. Must be nice in that no rape fantasy world of yours.

Men have been racing for hundreds of years. And they will continue to do so.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.


The fact that you don't understand how your views go out into the world and shape the social collective viewpoint on rape and victims of rape is horrifying to me, and that doesn't make me fragile. That makes me angry that there are still people out here going to the mats on what victims should do and should't do, calling it MOOT to discuss the rapist because, oh well, he's going to do it anyway, nothing to do here, and you don't see how you contribute to the very victim blaming society that's in play here is disgusting. You. Are. The. Problem. And you're too dumb to see it.


He IS going to do it anyway. And you’re too dumb to see that. Must be nice in that no rape fantasy world of yours.

Men have been racing for hundreds of years. And they will continue to do so.


^raping
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

Smoke alarms don’t prevent arson. Seat belts don’t prevent car jacking. Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape.

Getting so drunk you lose consciousness is risky, but it’s not a crime. What Turner did was criminal.


Listen you obviously think people shouldn’t do anything to mitigate risk. Like I said, that’s fine for you. Have at it.
Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape. But it definitely mitigates the risk. Why you wouldn’t teach your daughters to mitigate the risk of rape is beyond me.


THEY SHOULDN"T HAVE TO MITIGATE THE RISK. Men should . . . . just not rape. Whether the woman is sober or blackout drunk.


But in this world they do. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
If you want to tell your daughter she shouldn’t have to mitigate the risk, then you do you. But because no matter how many times you screech MEN SHOULDN’T RAPE, they still will. Ignore that at your own peril.

Not one person is arguing that women should drink til they pass out. But one or two people are arguing that women who do drink til they pass out are partially to blame if they’re raped while unconscious. That’s really messed up. It’s wise to be cautious with your safety, but rape victims are not responsible for their rapists’ actions.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

Smoke alarms don’t prevent arson. Seat belts don’t prevent car jacking. Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape.

Getting so drunk you lose consciousness is risky, but it’s not a crime. What Turner did was criminal.


Listen you obviously think people shouldn’t do anything to mitigate risk. Like I said, that’s fine for you. Have at it.
Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape. But it definitely mitigates the risk. Why you wouldn’t teach your daughters to mitigate the risk of rape is beyond me.


THEY SHOULDN"T HAVE TO MITIGATE THE RISK. Men should . . . . just not rape. Whether the woman is sober or blackout drunk.


But in this world they do. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
If you want to tell your daughter she shouldn’t have to mitigate the risk, then you do you. But because no matter how many times you screech MEN SHOULDN’T RAPE, they still will. Ignore that at your own peril.

Not one person is arguing that women should drink til they pass out. But one or two people are arguing that women who do drink til they pass out are partially to blame if they’re raped while unconscious. That’s really messed up. It’s wise to be cautious with your safety, but rape victims are not responsible for their rapists’ actions.


She wasn't raped while passed out behind the dumpster, she went behind the dumpster with a guy and had sex with him until she passed out - then he didn't notice and stop, at which point it became rape. Before that, though, it was a hookup.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

Smoke alarms don’t prevent arson. Seat belts don’t prevent car jacking. Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape.

Getting so drunk you lose consciousness is risky, but it’s not a crime. What Turner did was criminal.


Listen you obviously think people shouldn’t do anything to mitigate risk. Like I said, that’s fine for you. Have at it.
Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape. But it definitely mitigates the risk. Why you wouldn’t teach your daughters to mitigate the risk of rape is beyond me.


THEY SHOULDN"T HAVE TO MITIGATE THE RISK. Men should . . . . just not rape. Whether the woman is sober or blackout drunk.


But in this world they do. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
If you want to tell your daughter she shouldn’t have to mitigate the risk, then you do you. But because no matter how many times you screech MEN SHOULDN’T RAPE, they still will. Ignore that at your own peril.

Not one person is arguing that women should drink til they pass out. But one or two people are arguing that women who do drink til they pass out are partially to blame if they’re raped while unconscious. That’s really messed up. It’s wise to be cautious with your safety, but rape victims are not responsible for their rapists’ actions.


This rape victim isn't responsible for her rapist's actions but she is responsible for hers.
Anonymous
There are a lot of reasons people, and especially women, shouldn't drink to such excess; blacking out and passing out in public, next to a dumpster, is extremely disturbing on so many levels.

Yes, you do increase the odds you will be the victim of crime or accident when you, a man or woman, pass out in public, but passing out face down next to a dumpster is on an entirely different level.

I worked in campus security while in college, and far too often, and know from incident reports that students ended up dead as a result of too much drinking.

After a hard night of partying, the student, often a female, goes home, passes out, and never wakes up.

The university doesn't publicize it; at least they didn't when I was a student, but it happened more than once during my short time working as a safety ambassador.

One of the least desirable locations to patrol was Fraternity/Sorority Row way too much alcohol and way too much criminal behavior.

As part of working the row, we had to also patrol the train tracks that ran past the Row. And at least once a night on the weekend 1 or 2 students would lay down in the track bed and pass out, hot, freezing, cold, snow it didn't matter.

They'd just lay down and take a nap. And their friends also probably drunk would just leave them there. Young adult brains aren't exactly fully developed, so something you'd never do, they do because well it makes for a good story.

When that happened, we'd roll them off the tracks, freight trains don't run on a schedule, so they'd come through at all hours, and then call campus police.

I also comforted a friend one night who'd been in a Frat house, had too much to drink, passed out, and came too as a guy was raping her in his room, she didn't want to call the police, so called a campus hotline first, and was told there wasn't much to be done, she was told classic case of "he said she said." I was really upset for her. And shocked by how casually the incident was pushed off.

But what blew my mind was that the very next night, she called me from another Frat house, drunk, and near to passing out again, and asked me to come and get her.

Of course, I did, but I also yelled at her because I was so angry that she'd do the very same thing the very next night. I let her know that her behavior was out of control, and frankly bizarre and not the actions of a mentally stable person, at that point, and that she needed to get help. I threatened to call her mother if she didn't. She didn't need hand-holding at that point she needed to get help for being an alcoholic.
Anonymous
They don't want to hear it, PP. Alcohol and alcoholism are someone else's problem. It's always someone else's problem.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.


The fact that you don't understand how your views go out into the world and shape the social collective viewpoint on rape and victims of rape is horrifying to me, and that doesn't make me fragile. That makes me angry that there are still people out here going to the mats on what victims should do and should't do, calling it MOOT to discuss the rapist because, oh well, he's going to do it anyway, nothing to do here, and you don't see how you contribute to the very victim blaming society that's in play here is disgusting. You. Are. The. Problem. And you're too dumb to see it.


He IS going to do it anyway. And you’re too dumb to see that. Must be nice in that no rape fantasy world of yours.

Men have been racing for hundreds of years. And they will continue to do so.


So you're right, let's do nothing but focus on the women victims then. Good plan.
I'd rather have a no-rape fantasy than be an apathetic rape apologist, and that's exactly what you are when you excuse this behavior through deciding "so what, they're gonna rape no matter what, oh well!" You are literally excusing it through your emphasis on the victim's behavior.
Yes, of course that makes me angry.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

Smoke alarms don’t prevent arson. Seat belts don’t prevent car jacking. Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape.

Getting so drunk you lose consciousness is risky, but it’s not a crime. What Turner did was criminal.


Listen you obviously think people shouldn’t do anything to mitigate risk. Like I said, that’s fine for you. Have at it.
Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape. But it definitely mitigates the risk. Why you wouldn’t teach your daughters to mitigate the risk of rape is beyond me.


THEY SHOULDN"T HAVE TO MITIGATE THE RISK. Men should . . . . just not rape. Whether the woman is sober or blackout drunk.


But in this world they do. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
If you want to tell your daughter she shouldn’t have to mitigate the risk, then you do you. But because no matter how many times you screech MEN SHOULDN’T RAPE, they still will. Ignore that at your own peril.

Not one person is arguing that women should drink til they pass out. But one or two people are arguing that women who do drink til they pass out are partially to blame if they’re raped while unconscious. That’s really messed up. It’s wise to be cautious with your safety, but rape victims are not responsible for their rapists’ actions.


This rape victim isn't responsible for her rapist's actions but she is responsible for hers.

Right, so she’s responsible for being drunk and he’s responsible for raping her. What she did didn’t harm anyone else. What he did is a crime, a crime with a victim. He’s a criminal. That’s why we’re discussing his crime and the judge’s shockingly, unconscionably lax sentencing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

Smoke alarms don’t prevent arson. Seat belts don’t prevent car jacking. Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape.

Getting so drunk you lose consciousness is risky, but it’s not a crime. What Turner did was criminal.


Listen you obviously think people shouldn’t do anything to mitigate risk. Like I said, that’s fine for you. Have at it.
Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape. But it definitely mitigates the risk. Why you wouldn’t teach your daughters to mitigate the risk of rape is beyond me.


THEY SHOULDN"T HAVE TO MITIGATE THE RISK. Men should . . . . just not rape. Whether the woman is sober or blackout drunk.


But in this world they do. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
If you want to tell your daughter she shouldn’t have to mitigate the risk, then you do you. But because no matter how many times you screech MEN SHOULDN’T RAPE, they still will. Ignore that at your own peril.

Not one person is arguing that women should drink til they pass out. But one or two people are arguing that women who do drink til they pass out are partially to blame if they’re raped while unconscious. That’s really messed up. It’s wise to be cautious with your safety, but rape victims are not responsible for their rapists’ actions.


This rape victim isn't responsible for her rapist's actions but she is responsible for hers.

Right, so she’s responsible for being drunk and he’s responsible for raping her. What she did didn’t harm anyone else. What he did is a crime, a crime with a victim. He’s a criminal. That’s why we’re discussing his crime and the judge’s shockingly, unconscionably lax sentencing.


Nah, the judge made a good call on this one. But the judge got caught in the unhinged blow back, seen on this thread, defending the right of a woman to get blackout drunk and have sex with a boy, who had the bad luck to choose a woman who passed out before the end.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the book Know My Name by Chanel Miller, the woman who was raped by Brock Turner, and looked through this thread. Wow, some of the comments here were really eye-opening, and showed an extreme lack of knowledge of the case. Has anyone else read the book? If you thought she bore some culpability for what happened prior to the book being released, did your perspective change by what you learned?


I haven't read the book and think she has some culpability (a good bit of culpability) for what happened, given her history of drinking and having blackouts (and given her age).

Did the book change your perspective?


If you think it's open season to rape women who are passed out next to a dumpster, I doubt a book will change your mind.


Ah. So she doesn't admit to her own part.



Holy F. I hope this is a Russian bot trying to troll the internet and not a real person.


NP

Why assume bot? We live in a world where men do rape women who are blacked out. Whether or not they should is moot. They do. Therefore you should protect yourself and act accordingly. If you’re going to get drunk and pass out, you really shouldn’t be surprised if it happens.
You should act according to the world we actually live in, not the one you think we should live in.


No. No, it's not MOOT you idiot. That's the entirety of the point. It's THE POINT. Rapists shouldn't rape. That's it. That's all they have to do. NOT RAPE. Somehow, I see drunk people all the time. I don't rape them. IT'S NOT HARD. It's not a moot point. My god, who the F are you?


And robbers shouldn’t rob. And carjackers shouldn’t carjack. And arsonists shouldn’t start fires. And murderers shouldn’t murder.
How’s that fantasy world working out for you?


Do we have constant internet warriors or even judges saying you caused your own arson fire for something you did? Do we routinely see in the news what a person driving down the street did wrong to be carjacked? No.
Until we do, hmmmm. What could possibly be the difference here.


Personally I don’t GAF about what internet warriors say. I’m not that fragile. And I will continue to take precautions to mitigate the chances they any of these crimes happen to me. I’m impressed that you don’t have smoke alarms, or wear seatbelts, or feel comfortable getting blackout drunk anytime anywhere, or hanging out in a high crime area in the early morning hours. If that’s working for you, have at it. It doesn’t work for me. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

Smoke alarms don’t prevent arson. Seat belts don’t prevent car jacking. Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape.

Getting so drunk you lose consciousness is risky, but it’s not a crime. What Turner did was criminal.


Listen you obviously think people shouldn’t do anything to mitigate risk. Like I said, that’s fine for you. Have at it.
Staying sober doesn’t prevent rape. But it definitely mitigates the risk. Why you wouldn’t teach your daughters to mitigate the risk of rape is beyond me.


THEY SHOULDN"T HAVE TO MITIGATE THE RISK. Men should . . . . just not rape. Whether the woman is sober or blackout drunk.


But in this world they do. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
If you want to tell your daughter she shouldn’t have to mitigate the risk, then you do you. But because no matter how many times you screech MEN SHOULDN’T RAPE, they still will. Ignore that at your own peril.

Not one person is arguing that women should drink til they pass out. But one or two people are arguing that women who do drink til they pass out are partially to blame if they’re raped while unconscious. That’s really messed up. It’s wise to be cautious with your safety, but rape victims are not responsible for their rapists’ actions.


This rape victim isn't responsible for her rapist's actions but she is responsible for hers.

Right, so she’s responsible for being drunk and he’s responsible for raping her. What she did didn’t harm anyone else. What he did is a crime, a crime with a victim. He’s a criminal. That’s why we’re discussing his crime and the judge’s shockingly, unconscionably lax sentencing.


The only person responsible for a rape is the person who committed the rape. It doesn’t matter if the victim was drunk or wore sexy clothes or was deemed or assumed to be a “sl*t”- it is always, always the fault of the person who assaulted the victim, no one else.

It’s shocking that people don’t understand this. And very sad.
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: