Is it now "in style/cool" for teen girls to be in romantic relationships with other girls?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homosexuality and bisexuality is most definitely being pushed as an agenda.

It's not an "agenda". What you are seeing is younger people embracing diversity and understanding that homosexuality, bisexuality, a-sexuality, ..... are every bit as valid as heterosexuality. Frankly, I'm embarrassed that so many of my peers (I am 50) are so far behind in their thinking. Teen girls have learned that it is safe to explore sexuality. They understand that no one has the right to tell another person who they can and cannot love. And they view romantic love as something bigger than gender.

So if people don't agree with you, they are "behind in their thinking?" Fascinating.

No. People certainly have the right to their opinion. However, people who believe that black people and white people shouldn't marry are behind in their thinking. People who think that homosexuals shouldn't marry are no different. This is simply another civil rights issue. Those of us capable of rational thought understand that no one has the right to tell another consenting adult whom they are allowed to love.

Actually it is not. Blacks and white marrying was a racist thing. Right vs wrong. Being a homosexual is against nature. If everyone was gay, we would go extinct. It is similar to vaccinations. The anti-vax are mostly okay because the rest of the population vaccinate. Same with gays. They get their adopted kids because they depend on the normal heterosexuals to birth babies for them.

I completely agree with the vax vs gay analogy. Never thought of it like that but it is so true.

Except that gay children are born from heterosexual parents. So there's that.

Oh so they are born gay? okay then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Actually it is not. Blacks and white marrying was a racist thing. Right vs wrong. Being a homosexual is against nature. If everyone was gay, we would go extinct. It is similar to vaccinations. The anti-vax are mostly okay because the rest of the population vaccinate. Same with gays. They get their adopted kids because they depend on the normal heterosexuals to birth babies for them.

I know people who are gay with biological children. Actually, I also know people who are not gay with biological children who are gay. Nature is complicated, eh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Actually it is not. Blacks and white marrying was a racist thing. Right vs wrong. Being a homosexual is against nature. If everyone was gay, we would go extinct. It is similar to vaccinations. The anti-vax are mostly okay because the rest of the population vaccinate. Same with gays. They get their adopted kids because they depend on the normal heterosexuals to birth babies for them.

I know people who are gay with biological children. Actually, I also know people who are not gay with biological children who are gay. Nature is complicated, eh?

Actually, no it isn't. A man and a women make a child. 2 men can not and 2 women can not. Pretty simple to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Actually, no it isn't. A man and a women make a child. 2 men can not and 2 women can not. Pretty simple to me.

Well, actually, a sperm and an egg make a zygote, but who cares about science when there is hate to be hated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Actually it is not. Blacks and white marrying was a racist thing. Right vs wrong. Being a homosexual is against nature. If everyone was gay, we would go extinct. It is similar to vaccinations. The anti-vax are mostly okay because the rest of the population vaccinate. Same with gays. They get their adopted kids because they depend on the normal heterosexuals to birth babies for them.

I know people who are gay with biological children. Actually, I also know people who are not gay with biological children who are gay. Nature is complicated, eh?

Actually, no it isn't. A man and a women make a child. 2 men can not and 2 women can not. Pretty simple to me.

So people who cannot have biological children should clearly not be allowed to marry, right? Because the purpose of marriage is to produce offspring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Actually it is not. Blacks and white marrying was a racist thing. Right vs wrong. Being a homosexual is against nature. If everyone was gay, we would go extinct. It is similar to vaccinations. The anti-vax are mostly okay because the rest of the population vaccinate. Same with gays. They get their adopted kids because they depend on the normal heterosexuals to birth babies for them.

I know people who are gay with biological children. Actually, I also know people who are not gay with biological children who are gay. Nature is complicated, eh?

Actually, no it isn't. A man and a women make a child. 2 men can not and 2 women can not. Pretty simple to me.

So people who cannot have biological children should clearly not be allowed to marry, right? Because the purpose of marriage is to produce offspring.

Huh? No one is even talking about marriage. You are strange. A man and a woman are needed to produce offspring. Gay people rely on this. They can not produce their own offspring. They are lucky to have medical means and sperm donors, surrogates but evolution has been based on a man and women procreating. If everyone decided it was cool to be gay 100 years ago, we would be extinct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Huh? No one is even talking about marriage. You are strange. A man and a woman are needed to produce offspring. Gay people rely on this. They can not produce their own offspring. They are lucky to have medical means and sperm donors, surrogates but evolution has been based on a man and women procreating. If everyone decided it was cool to be gay 100 years ago, we would be extinct.

Technically, that's true. If 100% of the population was homosexual, we would fail to produce offspring. However, a gay man and a gay woman could have sex for the sole purpose of producing children.

However, if evolution is based on a man and woman procreating- why do homosexual people continue to be born from heterosexual parents? For a millennia, gay people could not reproduce, only in the past few decades has technology allowed gay people to reproduce via surrogates and sperm donors.

Why hasn't homosexuality been eliminated by Natural Selection if its contrary to evolution?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Huh? No one is even talking about marriage. You are strange. A man and a woman are needed to produce offspring. Gay people rely on this. They can not produce their own offspring. They are lucky to have medical means and sperm donors, surrogates but evolution has been based on a man and women procreating. If everyone decided it was cool to be gay 100 years ago, we would be extinct.

That's an odd thing to say. Of course gay people can produce their own offspring. It happens all the time. It happened 100 years ago, too. Do you really not know any gay people who have biological children? Where do you live?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is true: being gay is now popular.

We have lost the family as a human thing, the new cool is being gay and just chilling with some fuck buddies. Teens with little social development get suckered in, and are too afraid to own up to their poor choices to get back on track

Amazing how much power people think gay folks have. Really deluded.

If gays were as powerful as some of these posters would have us believe I would think they'd have equal rights by now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homosexuality and bisexuality is most definitely being pushed as an agenda.

It's not an "agenda". What you are seeing is younger people embracing diversity and understanding that homosexuality, bisexuality, a-sexuality, ..... are every bit as valid as heterosexuality. Frankly, I'm embarrassed that so many of my peers (I am 50) are so far behind in their thinking. Teen girls have learned that it is safe to explore sexuality. They understand that no one has the right to tell another person who they can and cannot love. And they view romantic love as something bigger than gender.

So if people don't agree with you, they are "behind in their thinking?" Fascinating.

So are you okay with polygamy because that agenda is up next. Following that is incest and after that, pedophilia.

No, no, stupid stupid. We are talking about consenting adults. That is not the same as incest or pedophilia. If you can't get that through your thick skull there's no point in even trying to have a conversation with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homosexuality and bisexuality is most definitely being pushed as an agenda.

It's not an "agenda". What you are seeing is younger people embracing diversity and understanding that homosexuality, bisexuality, a-sexuality, ..... are every bit as valid as heterosexuality. Frankly, I'm embarrassed that so many of my peers (I am 50) are so far behind in their thinking. Teen girls have learned that it is safe to explore sexuality. They understand that no one has the right to tell another person who they can and cannot love. And they view romantic love as something bigger than gender.

So if people don't agree with you, they are "behind in their thinking?" Fascinating.

So are you okay with polygamy because that agenda is up next. Following that is incest and after that, pedophilia.

No, no, stupid stupid. We are talking about consenting adults. That is not the same as incest or pedophilia. If you can't get that through your thick skull there's no point in even trying to have a conversation with you.

Polygamy is with consenting adults
Incest can also be with consenting adults

What if your 19yr old daughter and husband wanted a sexual relationship? Consenting adults. Decided to fight for the right to get married. They are in love. They can't help who they fall in love with. Is it wrong?

What if one man and 4 women all want to get married in DC and fight to have equal rights. Is it wrong?

There is no difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homosexuality and bisexuality is most definitely being pushed as an agenda.

It's not an "agenda". What you are seeing is younger people embracing diversity and understanding that homosexuality, bisexuality, a-sexuality, ..... are every bit as valid as heterosexuality. Frankly, I'm embarrassed that so many of my peers (I am 50) are so far behind in their thinking. Teen girls have learned that it is safe to explore sexuality. They understand that no one has the right to tell another person who they can and cannot love. And they view romantic love as something bigger than gender.

So if people don't agree with you, they are "behind in their thinking?" Fascinating.

So are you okay with polygamy because that agenda is up next. Following that is incest and after that, pedophilia.

No, no, stupid stupid. We are talking about consenting adults. That is not the same as incest or pedophilia. If you can't get that through your thick skull there's no point in even trying to have a conversation with you.

Polygamy is with consenting adults
Incest can also be with consenting adults

What if your 19yr old daughter and husband wanted a sexual relationship? Consenting adults. Decided to fight for the right to get married. They are in love. They can't help who they fall in love with. Is it wrong?

What if one man and 4 women all want to get married in DC and fight to have equal rights. Is it wrong?

There is no difference.

+1. You don't even have to be 19. The age of consent for marriage in some states is 16.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I scan my 14 year old's instagram account and have noticed that a large percentage of her classmates list themsels as "taken" or in a relationship with another female. Out of 48 female classmates, 32 list themselves as bisexual. Is this a new fad or is it possible that this large percentage is legit?

You can't be serious.

The agenda of the LGBT lobby to recruit your kids is succeeding, OP.

You are a disgusting human being PP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I scan my 14 year old's instagram account and have noticed that a large percentage of her classmates list themsels as "taken" or in a relationship with another female. Out of 48 female classmates, 32 list themselves as bisexual. Is this a new fad or is it possible that this large percentage is legit?

You can't be serious.

The agenda of the LGBT lobby to recruit your kids is succeeding, OP.

You are a disgusting human being PP

Why? What's so "disgusting" about this? There is a concentrated effort in schools by the LGBT lobby to bring about "tolerance," which translates to "acceptance," which of course translates to "give it a try!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Why? What's so "disgusting" about this? There is a concentrated effort in schools by the LGBT lobby to bring about "tolerance," which translates to "acceptance," which of course translates to "give it a try!"

Which dictionary are you using?