Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why people are so up in arms that someone allowed their child to invite just 5 people to her birthday party. Just because this other girl had a party that same weekend doesn't mean the OP had to change their plans. She had a 5 person party. What's the big deal? Are people not allowed to have small parties anymore? And if you opt for a small party, but someone else didn't, that means you can't go to that party? That doesn't make sense to me.
Please read the thread. This is NOT about small parties (I think small parties are great, personally). This is about defending your 7 year old DD's decision to exclude a girl from her birthday party, even as the DD attended other girl's birthday party that very same weekend.
I did read the thread. And it does seem like people are more concerned that the invitation wasn't reciprocated. That because she got to go to the other girl's party, that other girl should have been able to go to hers. I don't think that's necessarily true. People decide what size parties they want to have. She had her 5 person party. The other girl had a larger party. What in god's name is the problem? This is like saying, "You invited me to your wedding. I chose to attend that wedding. Now, even though I'm having a family-only wedding, I have to invite you to my wedding because I went to yours." No sense.
I think you're missing the point that the girl specifically wanted to exclude the other girl -
and had no qualms about telling her that - while at the same time going to the other girl's party. I think it would have been a whole other issue if it really was limited to just 5 girls and the mother said, sorry, you only get 5 and the other girl didn't make the cut - which is similar to your wedding example. However, the mom (OP) specifically said that after they got the other girl's invite, she told her daughter they'd make room for the other girl. the dd said no because of XYZ. Then turns around and goes to her party. Does that now make sense?
Hold on there, buster. You just said dd "had no qualms about telling her that."
In fact, dd didn't say anything about it until she was *put on the spot* by the other child who demanded to know why she hadn't been invited. By all of YOUR reasoning, she's a rude little witch because she put dd on the spot.
And for that matter, the third party girl who marched up to the excuded girl and told her ALL about the second party is a bitch too. By your reasoning, that is.
My dd didn't say a THING until confronted. She should have said, "I'm so sorry, my guest list was small and set before I received your invitation"
but she is 7 years old so she said what she really thought.
Think what you want, but please stop asigning malice here. You're awful. Beyond awful.