If the building isn't able to be used and if the county won't pay to fix it, I could see them tearing the school down and building a community (housing, retail, etc). While I've heard there are gates to do that, the county can't let a property like this (especially where it is situated) to sit dormant forever. Affordable housing? Good luck either way. This is going to be messy! |
THIS!! It is a shame it has gotten to this, but we're here... |
dp.. speaking of jobs at risk, you know that MoCo is bleeding jobs, and enrollment is declining, much like the rest of the country, right? How does it make sense to keep Wootton, a HS that needs millions in renovation, when there is a brand spanking new HS a couple of miles away? |
Incorrect. They bought homes based on the expectation of stability. If MCPS handled the Wootton situation like it did Blair, there would be less complaining. That was handled through YEARS of community input. Taylor doesn’t want to wait that long because he wants to declare victory for both his bosses (BOE) and Crown developers. Someone convinced him that using Crown as a holding school wasn’t a good idea - I want to know who - since he formally proposed doing so with all of the relevant information in hand. If using Crown as a holding school is such a financially irresponsible idea now, why did he propose it in the first place? |
Taylor is doing too much all at once. This has been a rushed and chaotic process and he added to it the regional model which has caused a lot of confusion. But he also inherited a complete mess. The process is what it is, but at the end of the day moving Wootton to Crown is the only affordable option. |
| I think the only winner here will be City of Gaithersburg. All other school clusters and City of Rockville, too bad. |
And maybe that will prove to be the case after a year or two of true community engagement and public scrutiny of the plans/data. But MCPS needs to do things right. |
Omg no thank you. The data is there you just don't like it. Taxpayers do not want to fund your temper tantrum. |
They keep switching their story. Either the building is unsafe or not. |
It’s not and there are significant holes in it. I’m sure MoCo taxpayers would like MCPS to deal fairly with affected communities. And if you’re so worried about taxes, I’m sure you would welcome the scrutiny by an independent party (judge and/or IG) to prove you’re right. What are you afraid of? |
So do you. It’s safe enough to use s a holding school or it isn’t. |
And the Crown developers. Don’t forget about the poor developers. |
But he is giving the Wootton Cluster a diesel school bus parking lot in exchange for closing their high school. He's a giver. |
Personally, I'm afraid of this dragging on any longer and furthering the divide in communities. If Anti-H could show in good faith they wanted to work with people and not just call everyone crooks, they might have had more of a shot in their "delay the vote" tactic. They tanked themselves and could use some lessons in interpersonal effectiveness. |
Isn't this the community going back and forth about the safety of the school and not MCPS? (I've seen petitions and testimony saying both that the school building is fine and not fine) MCPS story has always been that given the enrollment challenges, a 27th high school is not needed at the moment. Also, given the extensive CIP needs, a holding school would save money. Then they looked at it and decided that it was a better use of resources to move Wootton to the brand new building and use the old building as the holding school, since it would cost more money to keep Wootton running in the future as a full high school. The last presentation, MCPS said "MCPS will renovate Wootton as a holding school when funding allows and infrastructure upgrades would be required. It can be used as a holding school as it currently stands, but like all of our holding schools, we strive to complete necessary upgrades as funds become available." So, MCPS thinks the building is fine now, but will need more extensive repairs in the future. https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DS4PEU644E2C/$file/Supt%20Rec%20Secondary%20Prog%20Analysis%20Boundary%20Studies%20260312%20PPT%20REV.pdf |