Agree 100%. |
|
BYU would have beaten ND.
ND not playing is taking away another team's opportunity. |
Maybe yes, maybe no. What I do sense is that you reflect the childish behavior of ND football and its AD by engaging in name calling and pouting. If you really want to help improve ND football, then consider modifying your responses to something more reasonable and dignified. You are a true believer of ND football and its hype machine. Would be better to understand that ND football is not the center of the college football scene. There are dozens of great college football teams in the country. The ND macho aura of independence may do more harm to ND football in the future as change is here and still evolving with much less tolerance of self-idolizing independents. Better to be macho on the football field against a high quality opponent than to sit at home crying & bragging about perceived injustice to the greatest football program on earth. |
LOL there you go again! So issuerific! |
In order to argue effectively, you need to appreciate that there is more than one point of view. |
| Bravo for ND-they don’t need a participation trophy like Michigan our Texas. Miami should not be in CFP they lost 2 ACC games. As in basketball, Duke should have qualified as ACC champs. Also Bama got smoked. At what score in that rout by UGa would committee exclude them 35-0 or 28-0 and they struggled against weak Auburn team. Not a ND fan but admire their stand and Duke should be furious also. |
Texas and Michigan aren't being babies about their standings at the end of the regular season. ND's response is disgraceful. |
This. We are not talking about a group of teams where ND is the clearly superior team and everyone else is much worse. It was close. These teams are fairly comparable, as comparable as college football teams who do not play in the same conference (or any conference) can be. ND is mad that they didn't get that little extra "ND boost" they sometimes get. You know, the boost that led to a 12-team CFP in the first place. The little, often unspoken, but assumed belief that ND "deserves" to be among the best teams in college football because, you know, it's Notre Dame. Its brand is college football. That's why they have the sweet TV deal and the sweet sponsorship deals. But instead the CFP ignored that factor and just evaluated the best they could based on merit on the football field. This year for these teams, not based on some historical belief about the strength of the football programs. And this year, Miami beat ND and they had the same record. This year, Alabama beat Georgia and Vandy and had to play a much tougher schedule than ND. It was subjective, and that sucks because sports shouldn't be subjective but the CFP is always somewhat subjective, but there is a strong reason why Miami and Alabama deserved spots over ND. Unless you just instinctually believe ND always belongs in the CFP, which is how many ND boosters feel. Only then does it feel "unfair". |
|
OPT OUT LIKE A CHAMPION TODAY
Notre Shame |
But if conference record is important to the CFP then ND should never be in the CFP because they don't play in a conference and cherry pick their opponents. Unlike every other team you mention, ND is not required to play a single tough team all season, and they will selectively pick a couple ranked teams they think they can beat (this year they front loaded them and lost both games, oops). I would have been fine with Duke getting a spot but since conference record is not even a factor (and can't be, because of ND) I see why Miami got a spot instead. |
| Michigan is getting used to reality their future chances of getting into CFP are minimal. Harbaugh knew it and as an alum, left asap. No consistency in football selection. In basketball any school even those with sub .500 records if they win the Conference Championship get the automatic bid to NCAA dance. Duke got screwed and why Miami? Put in Ga Tech or SMU, which beat Miami. Look at the contrast between academic reputations and wealth if Duke and ND versus those of Miami, Bama, and JMU. Doubt many of the selection committee members graduated from a top 20 undergraduate school. |
| ^They shafted Duke by putting in JMU and Miami. |
| Duke has more reason to complain than ND. |
|
Some thoughts, in no particular order:
- As a fan of college football, and a team that isn't in this conversation after a disastrous season, I really can't get worked up about this. We are talking about 2 or 3 loss teams. There are arguments for all of them to make it, and all of them to be left out. Partisans will naturally feel like their teams have the best cases, but there is no objectively right or wrong answer. And remember, if any of them had won more games, they woudn't be in this situation. - I like the inclusion of the non-power conference teams. No, they likely they won't win, but they won their conferences, and it's the championship of the entire FBS. If the choice is between letting in teams like Tulane and JMU or making room for another 2 or 3 loss power conference team, I'd rather see the non-power conference teams. And who knows, every decade or so maybe we get a UMBC, or a George Mason, or a Univ. of Richmond. - Notre Dame wants to stay independent, and enjoys the benefits of that status, including the (significant) financial benefits. Fine, but this is the other side of that coin. In a tiebreaker, maybe they lose to a team with a conference behind it. Gotta take the good with the bad. |
It is entertaining, though. And the more ND does it, the more that non-ND fans laugh at them. |