Shelters are full of wonderful family dogs. I can walk into any open intake shelter in the country and find myself a good dog . If that isn't for you, it isn't for you, but that's nothing to do with the dogs, they're fine. |
Wtf is a bosun dog? Is rhat even a real word? |
|
|
Pit Bulls are killers.
https://bestlifeonline.com/most-dangerous-dog-breeds-2025/ |
As predicted... ![]() Ah, yes! "bestlifeonline.com", that reputable source of... clickbait nonsense, supports the paranoid position often espoused by anti-pit trolls here and elsewhere: they're "killers" and should be eliminated as a breed. Nobody with this position has ever owned a "pit bull" or worked with them, nor can they cite a credible source that supports their position. They will typically ignore any attempt to point out the flaws in their "facts" along with the reputable organizations that say things like "breed bans don't work". Watch: https://www.aaha.org/newstat/publications/breed-bans-and-the-human-animal-bond-not-taking-a-bite-out-of-crime/ https://www.aspca.org/improving-laws-animals/public-policy/what-breed-specific-legislation https://www.humanerescuealliance.org/blog/posts/pitbull-bans-have-no-place-in-a-humane-community (for the DC locals) You are showing your whole ass every time you post this mess. Just know that about yourself, because that's the point you're actually making. |
Bro, did you even read your own article?! ![]() “Any dog, regardless of breed reputation, can cause harm if not properly trained, socialized, or if placed in threatening situations.” |
ANY breed can be aggressive or can just be prone to playing a little too roughly.
Responsible owners will remove a dog who is playing too roughly, but you might need to separate your dog from them if you're the only one who feels the other dog is playing too roughly. For example, there is a lady who used to bring her dog to the same daycare as my dog used to attend, and she thought any play at all was a sign of aggression. She needed to get a grip. I've been bitten by two dogs, and both were probably ones that others would say are "never" or "rarely" aggressive. Neither dog was a pit mix, and both bites were completely unexpected. The first time was by a Golden Doodle whose owner had it on a Flexi leash while walking on the sidewalk in front of my house. I was in my yard deadheading flowers, and as I threw some dead flower heads into my compost bin, the dog went nuts, ran into my yard, and bit my upper leg, breaking the skin. Thankfully, the dog was fully vaccinated and I was okay other than some nasty bruising, but it was still scary. The second bite was by a Chihuahua owned by my friend. We were sitting on his couch, looking at photos from his childhood, and the dog began growling at both of us. Within seconds, it lunged forward and bit my ankle. No real damage was done due to dog mostly just getting my shoe in its mouth, but it was definitely an intentional bite. In my neighborhood is an Australian Shepherd who must be muzzled anytime he's outside his own fenced yard because he's reactive towards other dogs, children on bikes and scooters, and adult men. He's not a pit mix. |
If you had bden bitten by a pitbull instead of a doodle or chihuahua, you wouldn't have your leg muscles anymore. |
It's not even worth responding to your hysteria at this point. You have a problem. We see you. Sorry about your loss of whatever emotional and psychological control you may have once had. That must be tough. |
NP. Totally agree but every single thing posted showing the evidence is viewed as ‘click bait’ by the unhinged pit bull supporter. I think there’s mostly just one on here, but she posts and rants a lot and insults everyone who doesn’t agree with her. I once saw an op Ed posted on here by an ER doctor of 30 years who said he’d seen a dramatic increase of fatal to serious dog bites that corresponded with the increase in the pit bull population (and all serious bites he saw were from pits- far worse than even typical ‘aggressive’ breeds like German shepherds). Pit bull lady went nuts as always, claiming it was ‘fake news’ and ‘click bait’, and that ‘idiot’ dog owners who don’t ’train’ properly are the problem, and of course claiming that chihuahuas and Goldens are just as dangerous. Her other go to argument is that pits aren’t a defined breed so there’s no point in trying to ban them. Shes just unhinged |
Exactly this. But this PP refuses to acknowledge this. No one is saying other dogs can’t have issues or be aggressive. I’ve been bit by dogs over the years, and they’ve even broken skin a few times. I have a little dot on my hand from when a spaniel tooth broke through. But I still have my hand. Meanwhile I know multiple people who have had their pets killed by pitts, and one guy even had his own Pitt turn on him and lost his face. Yea, really. A go fund me was started to help repair his face. This is not an animal that we should have in our communities, hoping for the best. Just no. |
You’re the one who sounds hysterical |
"She" is several people, of which I'm one, but the anti-hysteria posters are not all me. Y'all need to learn what makes a credible source and what is, in fact, clickbait (like the article cited). It's not just you; an entire political party has exploited people's ignorance and willingness to believe the 'truthiness' of things that sound legit, especially when they agree with how you already feel. You should check that as a matter of practice, beyond just here in the pets forum. I don't usually bother trying to point that out to people anymore because it makes me sad to realize how many of you can't actually think critically, despite being willing to argue (and attack others) as if you can. "Pits" aren't a defined breed. This isn't one poster's opinion, this is actual fact. When you say that people sound "unhinged" for pointing this out, you're actually projecting your own unhinged argument/position. If you can't even clearly identify what a "pit bull" is, your position on "pit bulls" is meaningless. As for the medical article, I remember that. My argument on that thread, which is consistent throughout these threads, is this: In order to accurately gauge the risk from "pit bulls" you need a few variables nobody making the "all pits are killers" argument ever seems to have. 1) An accurate count of the total number of bites, and some form of classification. "Bites" aren't "maulings" aren't "fatalities". Please specify what you're counting. 2) An accurate count of the total number of "pit bulls". All breeds under the "pit bull" umbrella? All "pit mixes"? All dogs that look pit? 3) An accurate count of the total number of all dogs, also separated out by types/breeds/mixes/whatever you're measuring. If you can't understand why these facts are necessary to have statistically-relevant data about this problem, please ask someone else to help you, or go find one of the other "unhinged" comments I made carefully trying to explain this. I'm kinda tired of trying to help people who don't bother engaging in good faith. As for your need to attack me, well, that says pretty much all we need to know about you now, doesn't it? Weak attack, from an intellectually weak person. I'm sorry you're struggling so hard that lashing out at strangers on the internet is an outlet for your psychological trouble. I hope you have a better day! |
So you're going to kill off all the GSDs too? https://www.masslive.com/westernmass/2025/07/holyoke-woman-recovering-from-near-fatal-german-shepherd-mauling-dog-is-under-10-day-quarantine.html How about Boxers? Go back and find the thread here about the reality tv "star" who was mauled by his own boxer. And no, you don't know "multiple people who have had their pets killed by pitts". You lie, and it's sad. |