EVERY upper middle class tween and teen girl wearing booty shorts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only seriously perverted creeps get so fixated on this. I truly feel for our young girls that are so aggressively sexualized by others. THAT is what I am concerned about, more than the length of my daughter's shorts.

Grow up. The op isn’t “fixated” on this she is just inquiring into the parental mindset in allowing the dress.
The young girls are *trying* to sexualize their bodies. That’s the whole point of wearing shorts that look like underwear. It’s a normal part of adolescence, but it IS about attracting the leering glances of boys and men. In fact it is so obviously for this reason that the girls dress this way, that I find it strange when parents don’t question it- you have a duty to educate and set guidelines them in safety, academics, nutrition, good sleeping habits, safe sex, screens, financial independence…. But educating and setting guidelines for them in dress is being a “perverted creep.”
Got it. 🙄

No, it absolutely isn't. That's perverse. I have a teen DD and she has zero interest in boys at this age. She's tall, thin and not even aware there is a different sex out there but she does like her short shorts, her crop tops because that's the style. It's not about sexuality all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess I'm just not understanding the problem. The girls like it, the guys like it, the dads like it. It seems like it's just the moms that don't.

My boy is disgusted when the fat girls do it.

[Anonymous]

^Fair. Very problematic aesthetically.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only seriously perverted creeps get so fixated on this. I truly feel for our young girls that are so aggressively sexualized by others. THAT is what I am concerned about, more than the length of my daughter's shorts.

Grow up. The op isn’t “fixated” on this she is just inquiring into the parental mindset in allowing the dress.
The young girls are *trying* to sexualize their bodies. That’s the whole point of wearing shorts that look like underwear. It’s a normal part of adolescence, but it IS about attracting the leering glances of boys and men. In fact it is so obviously for this reason that the girls dress this way, that I find it strange when parents don’t question it- you have a duty to educate and set guidelines them in safety, academics, nutrition, good sleeping habits, safe sex, screens, financial independence…. But educating and setting guidelines for them in dress is being a “perverted creep.”
Got it. 🙄

No, it absolutely isn't. That's perverse. I have a teen DD and she has zero interest in boys at this age. She's tall, thin and not even aware there is a different sex out there but she does like her short shorts, her crop tops because that's the style. It's not about sexuality all the time.

Who do you think creates the “style”? Perverted nihilists who run the media, fashion and textile industries.

[Anonymous]

This is why creepy older men love going to the mall

[Anonymous]

Public schools are horrible with dress code. At my school , the nuns didnt even want us wearing hoop earrings and our skirts had to be to the knee (which we rolled up anyway) worn along with knee socks. Sneakers ,flip flops, tank tops, booty shorts are not worn to school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is why creepy older men love going to the mall

And then girls hate it when pervs look at them in their booty baring shorts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why creepy older men love going to the mall

And then girls hate it when pervs look at them in their booty baring shorts.

No, they like the attention

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only seriously perverted creeps get so fixated on this. I truly feel for our young girls that are so aggressively sexualized by others. THAT is what I am concerned about, more than the length of my daughter's shorts.

Grow up. The op isn’t “fixated” on this she is just inquiring into the parental mindset in allowing the dress.
The young girls are *trying* to sexualize their bodies. That’s the whole point of wearing shorts that look like underwear. It’s a normal part of adolescence, but it IS about attracting the leering glances of boys and men. In fact it is so obviously for this reason that the girls dress this way, that I find it strange when parents don’t question it- you have a duty to educate and set guidelines them in safety, academics, nutrition, good sleeping habits, safe sex, screens, financial independence…. But educating and setting guidelines for them in dress is being a “perverted creep.”
Got it. 🙄

No, it absolutely isn't. That's perverse. I have a teen DD and she has zero interest in boys at this age. She's tall, thin and not even aware there is a different sex out there but she does like her short shorts, her crop tops because that's the style. It's not about sexuality all the time.

Who do you think creates the “style”? Perverted nihilists who run the media, fashion and textile industries.

That may be true but girls don't always put on those shorts and think "Oooooh, I am attracting a male"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only seriously perverted creeps get so fixated on this. I truly feel for our young girls that are so aggressively sexualized by others. THAT is what I am concerned about, more than the length of my daughter's shorts.

Grow up. The op isn’t “fixated” on this she is just inquiring into the parental mindset in allowing the dress.
The young girls are *trying* to sexualize their bodies. That’s the whole point of wearing shorts that look like underwear. It’s a normal part of adolescence, but it IS about attracting the leering glances of boys and men. In fact it is so obviously for this reason that the girls dress this way, that I find it strange when parents don’t question it- you have a duty to educate and set guidelines them in safety, academics, nutrition, good sleeping habits, safe sex, screens, financial independence…. But educating and setting guidelines for them in dress is being a “perverted creep.”
Got it. 🙄

No, it absolutely isn't. That's perverse. I have a teen DD and she has zero interest in boys at this age. She's tall, thin and not even aware there is a different sex out there but she does like her short shorts, her crop tops because that's the style. It's not about sexuality all the time.

Males call them c**ktease.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only seriously perverted creeps get so fixated on this. I truly feel for our young girls that are so aggressively sexualized by others. THAT is what I am concerned about, more than the length of my daughter's shorts.

Grow up. The op isn’t “fixated” on this she is just inquiring into the parental mindset in allowing the dress.
The young girls are *trying* to sexualize their bodies. That’s the whole point of wearing shorts that look like underwear. It’s a normal part of adolescence, but it IS about attracting the leering glances of boys and men. In fact it is so obviously for this reason that the girls dress this way, that I find it strange when parents don’t question it- you have a duty to educate and set guidelines them in safety, academics, nutrition, good sleeping habits, safe sex, screens, financial independence…. But educating and setting guidelines for them in dress is being a “perverted creep.”
Got it. 🙄

No, it absolutely isn't. That's perverse. I have a teen DD and she has zero interest in boys at this age. She's tall, thin and not even aware there is a different sex out there but she does like her short shorts, her crop tops because that's the style. It's not about sexuality all the time.

Who do you think creates the “style”? Perverted nihilists who run the media, fashion and textile industries.

That may be true but girls don't always put on those shorts and think "Oooooh, I am attracting a male"

Actually, they do. These girls want to turn on men and boys by dressing provocatively - they may not be ready for a sexual encounter per se, but making a boy horny by their beauty gives them a sense of power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only seriously perverted creeps get so fixated on this. I truly feel for our young girls that are so aggressively sexualized by others. THAT is what I am concerned about, more than the length of my daughter's shorts.

Grow up. The op isn’t “fixated” on this she is just inquiring into the parental mindset in allowing the dress.
The young girls are *trying* to sexualize their bodies. That’s the whole point of wearing shorts that look like underwear. It’s a normal part of adolescence, but it IS about attracting the leering glances of boys and men. In fact it is so obviously for this reason that the girls dress this way, that I find it strange when parents don’t question it- you have a duty to educate and set guidelines them in safety, academics, nutrition, good sleeping habits, safe sex, screens, financial independence…. But educating and setting guidelines for them in dress is being a “perverted creep.”
Got it. 🙄

No, it absolutely isn't. That's perverse. I have a teen DD and she has zero interest in boys at this age. She's tall, thin and not even aware there is a different sex out there but she does like her short shorts, her crop tops because that's the style. It's not about sexuality all the time.

Who do you think creates the “style”? Perverted nihilists who run the media, fashion and textile industries.

+1 this doesn’t happen in a vacuum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyday at kiss and ride loop the girls come out with short-shorts on. One after the other. After the other. The shorts are so high up that you can see their butt cheek jiggling. I’m shocked that they would want to go to school and sit in close proximity to others with their butt cheek edges hanging out all day.

Thank God for uniforms!

And as others have said - not a class issue - fancy private school kids have them under their skirts, which come off the moment they get home, exposing their way too short shorts. I sigh because my older girls do this and now my 9 year old is rolling her shorts to make them shorter.

The girls at private schools wear their uniform skirts so short you can see their cheeks.

This. The Catholic school in my hometown was St. Gertrude and everyone (including the girls themselves) called them “Dirty Gerties.”

Oy vey, talk about a chip on your shoulder. Decades later you're still holding a grudge against and smearing all of those pretty, affluent, and proper Catholic girls. Yeah they're affluent and pretty... but... but... they were trashy drunken whores who hiked their uniform skirts up! Let it go.

Catholic school is where you go if your parents don’t think you are behaving properly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only seriously perverted creeps get so fixated on this. I truly feel for our young girls that are so aggressively sexualized by others. THAT is what I am concerned about, more than the length of my daughter's shorts.

Grow up. The op isn’t “fixated” on this she is just inquiring into the parental mindset in allowing the dress.
The young girls are *trying* to sexualize their bodies. That’s the whole point of wearing shorts that look like underwear. It’s a normal part of adolescence, but it IS about attracting the leering glances of boys and men. In fact it is so obviously for this reason that the girls dress this way, that I find it strange when parents don’t question it- you have a duty to educate and set guidelines them in safety, academics, nutrition, good sleeping habits, safe sex, screens, financial independence…. But educating and setting guidelines for them in dress is being a “perverted creep.”
Got it. 🙄

No, it absolutely isn't. That's perverse. I have a teen DD and she has zero interest in boys at this age. She's tall, thin and not even aware there is a different sex out there but she does like her short shorts, her crop tops because that's the style. It's not about sexuality all the time.

Who do you think creates the “style”? Perverted nihilists who run the media, fashion and textile industries.

That may be true but girls don't always put on those shorts and think "Oooooh, I am attracting a male"

Actually, they do. These girls want to turn on men and boys by dressing provocatively - they may not be ready for a sexual encounter per se, but making a boy horny by their beauty gives them a sense of power.

Look, that may be true for some girls but it's not true for a lot. I can guarantee mine aren't thinking about any of this when they put on their jean cutoffs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyday at kiss and ride loop the girls come out with short-shorts on. One after the other. After the other. The shorts are so high up that you can see their butt cheek jiggling. I’m shocked that they would want to go to school and sit in close proximity to others with their butt cheek edges hanging out all day.

Thank God for uniforms!

And as others have said - not a class issue - fancy private school kids have them under their skirts, which come off the moment they get home, exposing their way too short shorts. I sigh because my older girls do this and now my 9 year old is rolling her shorts to make them shorter.

The girls at private schools wear their uniform skirts so short you can see their cheeks.

This. The Catholic school in my hometown was St. Gertrude and everyone (including the girls themselves) called them “Dirty Gerties.”

Oy vey, talk about a chip on your shoulder. Decades later you're still holding a grudge against and smearing all of those pretty, affluent, and proper Catholic girls. Yeah they're affluent and pretty... but... but... they were trashy drunken whores who hiked their uniform skirts up! Let it go.

Catholic school is where you go if your parents don’t think you are behaving properly.

Sorry your parents couldn't afford it. That doesn't mean the more affluent girls there were all drunken sluts. Let it go.