MLSnext 2 and GA moves to school year cutoff from 26-27 season

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting that this statement and the mcclean email both reference US soccer as the driving force. What has been conveyed to the public is that us youth soccer, us club soccer, and ayso are driving this change. Has something changed behind the scenes with us soccer involvement? If so, that would signal everyone going SY as opposed to some leagues staying BY.

No, it is PR being created for clubs by USYS, that is being copy/paste disseminated by clubs. More than likely it’s 3rd party marketing that doesn’t understand the difference between USYS and USSF and nobody caught the error.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting that this statement and the mcclean email both reference US soccer as the driving force. What has been conveyed to the public is that us youth soccer, us club soccer, and ayso are driving this change. Has something changed behind the scenes with us soccer involvement? If so, that would signal everyone going SY as opposed to some leagues staying BY.

No, it is PR being created for clubs by USYS, that is being copy/paste disseminated by clubs. More than likely it’s 3rd party marketing that doesn’t understand the difference between USYS and USSF and nobody caught the error.

Your take is more than likely an attempt at spin with alternative facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting that this statement and the mcclean email both reference US soccer as the driving force. What has been conveyed to the public is that us youth soccer, us club soccer, and ayso are driving this change. Has something changed behind the scenes with us soccer involvement? If so, that would signal everyone going SY as opposed to some leagues staying BY.

No, it is PR being created for clubs by USYS, that is being copy/paste disseminated by clubs. More than likely it’s 3rd party marketing that doesn’t understand the difference between USYS and USSF and nobody caught the error.

Your take is more than likely an attempt at spin with alternative facts.

Huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting that this statement and the mcclean email both reference US soccer as the driving force. What has been conveyed to the public is that us youth soccer, us club soccer, and ayso are driving this change. Has something changed behind the scenes with us soccer involvement? If so, that would signal everyone going SY as opposed to some leagues staying BY. [/quote
No, it is PR being created for clubs by USYS, that is being copy/paste disseminated by clubs. More than likely it’s 3rd party marketing that doesn’t understand the difference between USYS and USSF and nobody caught the error.

Your take is more than likely an attempt at spin with alternative facts.

Huh?

Supposition, won't stand up in court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting that this statement and the mcclean email both reference US soccer as the driving force. What has been conveyed to the public is that us youth soccer, us club soccer, and ayso are driving this change. Has something changed behind the scenes with us soccer involvement? If so, that would signal everyone going SY as opposed to some leagues staying BY.

No, it is PR being created for clubs by USYS, that is being copy/paste disseminated by clubs. More than likely it’s 3rd party marketing that doesn’t understand the difference between USYS and USSF and nobody caught the error.

Your take is more than likely an attempt at spin with alternative facts.

🤣 you’re an idiot.

Alternative facts like the USSF statements that say they’re providing 9/1 or 1/1 options for leagues? Not mandating SY vs BY?

Or your assumption…that USSF secretly actually mandated 9/1 and it’s their public statement giving a “choice between SY & BY for leagues” that is ACTUALLY the PR mess up…

What a dork

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting that this statement and the mcclean email both reference US soccer as the driving force. What has been conveyed to the public is that us youth soccer, us club soccer, and ayso are driving this change. Has something changed behind the scenes with us soccer involvement? If so, that would signal everyone going SY as opposed to some leagues staying BY.

No, it is PR being created for clubs by USYS, that is being copy/paste disseminated by clubs. More than likely it’s 3rd party marketing that doesn’t understand the difference between USYS and USSF and nobody caught the error.

Your take is more than likely an attempt at spin with alternative facts.

🤣 you’re an idiot.

Alternative facts like the USSF statements that say they’re providing 9/1 or 1/1 options for leagues? Not mandating SY vs BY?

Or your assumption…that USSF secretly actually mandated 9/1 and it’s their public statement giving a “choice between SY & BY for leagues” that is ACTUALLY the PR mess up…

What a dork

Ad Hominem fallacy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting that this statement and the mcclean email both reference US soccer as the driving force. What has been conveyed to the public is that us youth soccer, us club soccer, and ayso are driving this change. Has something changed behind the scenes with us soccer involvement? If so, that would signal everyone going SY as opposed to some leagues staying BY.

No, it is PR being created for clubs by USYS, that is being copy/paste disseminated by clubs. More than likely it’s 3rd party marketing that doesn’t understand the difference between USYS and USSF and nobody caught the error.

Your take is more than likely an attempt at spin with alternative facts.

🤣 you’re an idiot.

Alternative facts like the USSF statements that say they’re providing 9/1 or 1/1 options for leagues? Not mandating SY vs BY?

Or your assumption…that USSF secretly actually mandated 9/1 and it’s their public statement giving a “choice between SY & BY for leagues” that is ACTUALLY the PR mess up…

What a dork

When the three largest youth organizations announce their move to SY and MLS creates MLS2, it is a done deal for SY. Of course, you can choose to bury your head in the sand and pretend nothing will happen. We should get all the confirmation in 2 weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting that this statement and the mcclean email both reference US soccer as the driving force. What has been conveyed to the public is that us youth soccer, us club soccer, and ayso are driving this change. Has something changed behind the scenes with us soccer involvement? If so, that would signal everyone going SY as opposed to some leagues staying BY.

No, it is PR being created for clubs by USYS, that is being copy/paste disseminated by clubs. More than likely it’s 3rd party marketing that doesn’t understand the difference between USYS and USSF and nobody caught the error.

Your take is more than likely an attempt at spin with alternative facts.

🤣 you’re an idiot.

Alternative facts like the USSF statements that say they’re providing 9/1 or 1/1 options for leagues? Not mandating SY vs BY?

Or your assumption…that USSF secretly actually mandated 9/1 and it’s their public statement giving a “choice between SY & BY for leagues” that is ACTUALLY the PR mess up…

What a dork

When the three largest youth organizations announce their move to SY and MLS creates MLS2, it is a done deal for SY. Of course, you can choose to bury your head in the sand and pretend nothing will happen. We should get all the confirmation in 2 weeks.

Whats in two weeks?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting that this statement and the mcclean email both reference US soccer as the driving force. What has been conveyed to the public is that us youth soccer, us club soccer, and ayso are driving this change. Has something changed behind the scenes with us soccer involvement? If so, that would signal everyone going SY as opposed to some leagues staying BY.

No, it is PR being created for clubs by USYS, that is being copy/paste disseminated by clubs. More than likely it’s 3rd party marketing that doesn’t understand the difference between USYS and USSF and nobody caught the error.

Your take is more than likely an attempt at spin with alternative facts.

🤣 you’re an idiot.

Alternative facts like the USSF statements that say they’re providing 9/1 or 1/1 options for leagues? Not mandating SY vs BY?

Or your assumption…that USSF secretly actually mandated 9/1 and it’s their public statement giving a “choice between SY & BY for leagues” that is ACTUALLY the PR mess up…

What a dork

When the three largest youth organizations announce their move to SY and MLS creates MLS2, it is a done deal for SY. Of course, you can choose to bury your head in the sand and pretend nothing will happen. We should get all the confirmation in 2 weeks.

Whats in two weeks?

Every day of the week twice, "but that's not important right now."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting that this statement and the mcclean email both reference US soccer as the driving force. What has been conveyed to the public is that us youth soccer, us club soccer, and ayso are driving this change. Has something changed behind the scenes with us soccer involvement? If so, that would signal everyone going SY as opposed to some leagues staying BY.

No, it is PR being created for clubs by USYS, that is being copy/paste disseminated by clubs. More than likely it’s 3rd party marketing that doesn’t understand the difference between USYS and USSF and nobody caught the error.

Your take is more than likely an attempt at spin with alternative facts.

🤣 you’re an idiot.

Alternative facts like the USSF statements that say they’re providing 9/1 or 1/1 options for leagues? Not mandating SY vs BY?

Or your assumption…that USSF secretly actually mandated 9/1 and it’s their public statement giving a “choice between SY & BY for leagues” that is ACTUALLY the PR mess up…

What a dork

This is the worst post of this Anonymous forums. Just stop.

[Anonymous]

Booms over insults

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ve already lost two soccer friends over the change. They are angry about my kid being born in September.

BY have 12 month range so kids can be a year younger than opponents

SY has 12 month range so kids can be a year younger than opponents

[Anonymous]

This evening (March 22nd) our CEO has ensured us that MLS Next won’t move to SY (according to MLS Next management inner information).

Since U13 we have first teams at MLSN1, and now second teams will join MLSN2.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This evening (March 22nd) our CEO has ensured us that MLS Next won’t move to SY (according to MLS Next management inner information).

Since U13 we have first teams at MLSN1, and now second teams will join MLSN2.

That sounds pretty official then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This evening (March 22nd) our CEO has ensured us that MLS Next won’t move to SY (according to MLS Next management inner information).

Since U13 we have first teams at MLSN1, and now second teams will join MLSN2.

MLS2 will play HS soccer, so it needs to stay in SY to reduce the trap. If MLS is BY, then it is a mess. I can't figure out a good reason for MLS to have two separate systems.