Trump demands that Israeli hostages released before 1/20 or he will destroy them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would Trump even deign to cater to Adelman and Schwartzman? They have zero control over his moves now that he’s used their largesse to secure the second term. Poorly played hand by both of them if they actually thought they would have leverage over the decisions of an independent thinker in a lame duck presidency. Idiots.

You're right. Billionaires just throw money away without expecting any ROI, and you're definitely smarter than they are.

No, you’re right. Banking on Trump keeping his word is a smart strategy. Besides, mouthbreathers like Miriam and Steven are leagues beyond my tiny widdle bwain, so what was I thinking?!

So dumb!

POTUS taking your calls? He'll be taking theirs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For Trump, everything is very simple and very personal. If Hamas doesn't release the hostages by inauguration, Trump will feel personally attacked by Hamas. He will feel that Hamas is going out of its way to make an enemy of Donald Trump. By not cooperating and deferring to him, Trump will feel that Hamas is out to humiliate and embarrass him. And Trump regards that as unacceptable. Therefore, since Hamas made a personal enemy out of Trump, he will feel justified in using the powers of the US government to utterly crush and destroy Hamas and their backers and supporters.

For Trump, everything is personal. You'll notice the rest of the world - from France to Ukraine to Japan to Canada - are all playing along. It really does behoove Hamas and Iran to get their act together and make a plan for January 20th. Because it will be different afterwards. This is an administration that is enthusiastically pro-Israel and is looking forward to a far more confrontational approach to Iran and its allies like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.

But didn’t Trump campaign on an anti foreign wars position? So he is a liar. So then why is this not also a lie?

No country on Earth is going to war for Palestinians. It's in no one's interest. They were given an independent state in 1947 and 1993. Instead, Palestinians chose war and terrorism and endless intifada. Plus Black September and Munich and civil war in Lebanon and aiding the invasion of Kuwait and supporting 9/11 and killing a bunch of kids on 10/7 and committing war crimes in Syria in support of Assad and being a puppet of Iran.

The entire Arab world has given the green light for the destruction of Palestinians. They have been a nightmare for Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt.

The US is not getting involved with this militarily. But the fact that even Arab-Americans are voting for Trump should be a clue about how this is going to go for the next four years.

Palestinians really messed up with their choices - from the PLO to Hamas.

If Hamas releases the remaining hostages before 1/20 there might be some hope. But if they don't, it's going to get worse.

10/7 might be the dumbest thing anyone has ever done ever.

Other than rejecting resolution 181.

Palestinian leadership has been a catastrophe for the Palestinian people for 80 years and counting.

Yes they should have never allowed Jews to steal their land. Should have had secure borders in Palestine. The good news is Israel military and intelligence services have been in steep decline for decades. Only a matter of time before the wheel comes back and Israel’s fortunes fall. IDF has already suffered close to 1,000 killed and 11-12,000 wounded in Lebanon. They also publicly report that Hamas is in control of Gaza. Live by the sword die by the sword.

Yes, they should have accepted 181 b/c we've seen the alternative.

Would you choose 181 borders or the current Palestinian situation?

Patiently awaiting your response.

The rest of your post is absurd fantasy. Objectively speaking (without taking morality into account), Israel has absolutely, positively won this conflict and perhaps has further expanded its territory. Meanwhile, its only real adversary--Iran--is weakened and its proxy network devastated.

Do not waste your time engaging with the rabid Ham-a$$ troll from the Gaza troll farm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would Trump even deign to cater to Adelman and Schwartzman? They have zero control over his moves now that he’s used their largesse to secure the second term. Poorly played hand by both of them if they actually thought they would have leverage over the decisions of an independent thinker in a lame duck presidency. Idiots.

You're right. Billionaires just throw money away without expecting any ROI, and you're definitely smarter than they are.

No, you’re right. Banking on Trump keeping his word is a smart strategy. Besides, mouthbreathers like Miriam and Steven are leagues beyond my tiny widdle bwain, so what was I thinking?!

So dumb!

POTUS taking your calls? He'll be taking theirs.

Wishful thinking. He has nothing further to gain from those fleabags.

Sucked ‘em dry like the one-dimensional tools they were to him … mission accomplished, leverage silenced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would Trump even deign to cater to Adelman and Schwartzman? They have zero control over his moves now that he’s used their largesse to secure the second term. Poorly played hand by both of them if they actually thought they would have leverage over the decisions of an independent thinker in a lame duck presidency. Idiots.

You're right. Billionaires just throw money away without expecting any ROI, and you're definitely smarter than they are.

No, you’re right. Banking on Trump keeping his word is a smart strategy. Besides, mouthbreathers like Miriam and Steven are leagues beyond my tiny widdle bwain, so what was I thinking?!

So dumb!

POTUS taking your calls? He'll be taking theirs.

And to demonstrate the point, I’m sure you’ve noticed that the prospective composition of his cabinet is not quite the rabid, unhinged Zionist army that you had hoped for - absent Huckabee.

Ya think Miriam is happy ‘bout that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would Trump even deign to cater to Adelman and Schwartzman? They have zero control over his moves now that he’s used their largesse to secure the second term. Poorly played hand by both of them if they actually thought they would have leverage over the decisions of an independent thinker in a lame duck presidency. Idiots.

You're right. Billionaires just throw money away without expecting any ROI, and you're definitely smarter than they are.

No, you’re right. Banking on Trump keeping his word is a smart strategy. Besides, mouthbreathers like Miriam and Steven are leagues beyond my tiny widdle bwain, so what was I thinking?!

So dumb!

POTUS taking your calls? He'll be taking theirs.

And to demonstrate the point, I’m sure you’ve noticed that the prospective composition of his cabinet is not quite the rabid, unhinged Zionist army that you had hoped for - absent Huckabee.

Ya think Miriam is happy ‘bout that?

Absent Huckabee?

Aside from that, Mrs. Lincoln, did you enjoy the play?

And I don't have a dog in this fight. Just calling balls and strikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would Trump even deign to cater to Adelman and Schwartzman? They have zero control over his moves now that he’s used their largesse to secure the second term. Poorly played hand by both of them if they actually thought they would have leverage over the decisions of an independent thinker in a lame duck presidency. Idiots.

You're right. Billionaires just throw money away without expecting any ROI, and you're definitely smarter than they are.

No, you’re right. Banking on Trump keeping his word is a smart strategy. Besides, mouthbreathers like Miriam and Steven are leagues beyond my tiny widdle bwain, so what was I thinking?!

So dumb!

POTUS taking your calls? He'll be taking theirs.

Wishful thinking. He has nothing further to gain from those fleabags.

Sucked ‘em dry like the one-dimensional tools they were to him … mission accomplished, leverage silenced.

You are really none too bright. Adieu.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would Trump even deign to cater to Adelman and Schwartzman? They have zero control over his moves now that he’s used their largesse to secure the second term. Poorly played hand by both of them if they actually thought they would have leverage over the decisions of an independent thinker in a lame duck presidency. Idiots.

You're right. Billionaires just throw money away without expecting any ROI, and you're definitely smarter than they are.

No, you’re right. Banking on Trump keeping his word is a smart strategy. Besides, mouthbreathers like Miriam and Steven are leagues beyond my tiny widdle bwain, so what was I thinking?!

So dumb!

POTUS taking your calls? He'll be taking theirs.

Wishful thinking. He has nothing further to gain from those fleabags.

Sucked ‘em dry like the one-dimensional tools they were to him … mission accomplished, leverage silenced.

You are really none too bright. Adieu.

0% Ashkenazi, so it was unreasonable to expect me to keep up with your exemplar brilliance, naturally.

/s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would Trump even deign to cater to Adelman and Schwartzman? They have zero control over his moves now that he’s used their largesse to secure the second term. Poorly played hand by both of them if they actually thought they would have leverage over the decisions of an independent thinker in a lame duck presidency. Idiots.

You're right. Billionaires just throw money away without expecting any ROI, and you're definitely smarter than they are.

No, you’re right. Banking on Trump keeping his word is a smart strategy. Besides, mouthbreathers like Miriam and Steven are leagues beyond my tiny widdle bwain, so what was I thinking?!

So dumb!

POTUS taking your calls? He'll be taking theirs.

And to demonstrate the point, I’m sure you’ve noticed that the prospective composition of his cabinet is not quite the rabid, unhinged Zionist army that you had hoped for - absent Huckabee.

Ya think Miriam is happy ‘bout that?

Absent Huckabee?

Aside from that, Mrs. Lincoln, did you enjoy the play?

And I don't have a dog in this fight. Just calling balls and strikes.

Where in the umpire manual did you read that trusting a lifelong liar is sure to result in realty meeting expectations?

[Anonymous]

* reality

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would Trump even deign to cater to Adelman and Schwartzman? They have zero control over his moves now that he’s used their largesse to secure the second term. Poorly played hand by both of them if they actually thought they would have leverage over the decisions of an independent thinker in a lame duck presidency. Idiots.

You're right. Billionaires just throw money away without expecting any ROI, and you're definitely smarter than they are.

No, you’re right. Banking on Trump keeping his word is a smart strategy. Besides, mouthbreathers like Miriam and Steven are leagues beyond my tiny widdle bwain, so what was I thinking?!

So dumb!

POTUS taking your calls? He'll be taking theirs.

Wishful thinking. He has nothing further to gain from those fleabags.

Sucked ‘em dry like the one-dimensional tools they were to him … mission accomplished, leverage silenced.

You are really none too bright. Adieu.

0% Ashkenazi, so it was unreasonable to expect me to keep up with your exemplar brilliance, naturally.

/s

Me too, so even footing. And you still struggle. Maybe not enough Irish in ya?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would Trump even deign to cater to Adelman and Schwartzman? They have zero control over his moves now that he’s used their largesse to secure the second term. Poorly played hand by both of them if they actually thought they would have leverage over the decisions of an independent thinker in a lame duck presidency. Idiots.

You're right. Billionaires just throw money away without expecting any ROI, and you're definitely smarter than they are.

No, you’re right. Banking on Trump keeping his word is a smart strategy. Besides, mouthbreathers like Miriam and Steven are leagues beyond my tiny widdle bwain, so what was I thinking?!

So dumb!

POTUS taking your calls? He'll be taking theirs.

And to demonstrate the point, I’m sure you’ve noticed that the prospective composition of his cabinet is not quite the rabid, unhinged Zionist army that you had hoped for - absent Huckabee.

Ya think Miriam is happy ‘bout that?

Absent Huckabee?

Aside from that, Mrs. Lincoln, did you enjoy the play?

And I don't have a dog in this fight. Just calling balls and strikes.

Where in the umpire manual did you read that trusting a lifelong liar is sure to result in realty meeting expectations?

Human Nature 101. Money talks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For Trump, everything is very simple and very personal. If Hamas doesn't release the hostages by inauguration, Trump will feel personally attacked by Hamas. He will feel that Hamas is going out of its way to make an enemy of Donald Trump. By not cooperating and deferring to him, Trump will feel that Hamas is out to humiliate and embarrass him. And Trump regards that as unacceptable. Therefore, since Hamas made a personal enemy out of Trump, he will feel justified in using the powers of the US government to utterly crush and destroy Hamas and their backers and supporters.

For Trump, everything is personal. You'll notice the rest of the world - from France to Ukraine to Japan to Canada - are all playing along. It really does behoove Hamas and Iran to get their act together and make a plan for January 20th. Because it will be different afterwards. This is an administration that is enthusiastically pro-Israel and is looking forward to a far more confrontational approach to Iran and its allies like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.

But didn’t Trump campaign on an anti foreign wars position? So he is a liar. So then why is this not also a lie?

No country on Earth is going to war for Palestinians. It's in no one's interest. They were given an independent state in 1947 and 1993. Instead, Palestinians chose war and terrorism and endless intifada. Plus Black September and Munich and civil war in Lebanon and aiding the invasion of Kuwait and supporting 9/11 and killing a bunch of kids on 10/7 and committing war crimes in Syria in support of Assad and being a puppet of Iran.

The entire Arab world has given the green light for the destruction of Palestinians. They have been a nightmare for Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt.

The US is not getting involved with this militarily. But the fact that even Arab-Americans are voting for Trump should be a clue about how this is going to go for the next four years.

Palestinians really messed up with their choices - from the PLO to Hamas.

If Hamas releases the remaining hostages before 1/20 there might be some hope. But if they don't, it's going to get worse.

10/7 might be the dumbest thing anyone has ever done ever.

Other than rejecting resolution 181.

Palestinian leadership has been a catastrophe for the Palestinian people for 80 years and counting.

Yes they should have never allowed Jews to steal their land. Should have had secure borders in Palestine. The good news is Israel military and intelligence services have been in steep decline for decades. Only a matter of time before the wheel comes back and Israel’s fortunes fall. IDF has already suffered close to 1,000 killed and 11-12,000 wounded in Lebanon. They also publicly report that Hamas is in control of Gaza. Live by the sword die by the sword.

Yes, they should have accepted 181 b/c we've seen the alternative.

Would you choose 181 borders or the current Palestinian situation?

Patiently awaiting your response.

The rest of your post is absurd fantasy. Objectively speaking (without taking morality into account), Israel has absolutely, positively won this conflict and perhaps has further expanded its territory. Meanwhile, its only real adversary--Iran--is weakened and its proxy network devastated.

lol Israel has lost this conflict. You all got run over by a few 100 militia men with light weapons on Oct 7. What the f? The IDF can’t even secure Gaza. Hamas controls it. As for Lebanon the IDF is running for home. It took the IDF 12 years to surrender last time. This time it is a matter of months. Those are real casualties numbers with lots of equipment destroyed or damaged. Israel has suppressed this but is leaking out. Israel is alone in the Middle East and the world. Every Arab nation has pushed you all off to arm’s length and Turkey is now leading the resistance against you. Go ahead and try’s to bomb Turkey. See what happens. Your boys are having all kinds of problems.

Iran has proven they can hit targets in Israel at any time and Israel is incapable of stopping it. Israel has to rely on the US to shoot down the drone and missiles but the US did not shoot down the ballistic missiles. Soon Iran will have nuclear weapons on ballistic missiles,and the US will not think of touching them. How long can Israel remain on full deployment? Don’t you have a real economy? Israel is circling the drain and your only friend is a back stabbing Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would Trump even deign to cater to Adelman and Schwartzman? They have zero control over his moves now that he’s used their largesse to secure the second term. Poorly played hand by both of them if they actually thought they would have leverage over the decisions of an independent thinker in a lame duck presidency. Idiots.

You're right. Billionaires just throw money away without expecting any ROI, and you're definitely smarter than they are.

No, you’re right. Banking on Trump keeping his word is a smart strategy. Besides, mouthbreathers like Miriam and Steven are leagues beyond my tiny widdle bwain, so what was I thinking?!

So dumb!

POTUS taking your calls? He'll be taking theirs.

And to demonstrate the point, I’m sure you’ve noticed that the prospective composition of his cabinet is not quite the rabid, unhinged Zionist army that you had hoped for - absent Huckabee.

Ya think Miriam is happy ‘bout that?

Absent Huckabee?

Aside from that, Mrs. Lincoln, did you enjoy the play?

And I don't have a dog in this fight. Just calling balls and strikes.

Where in the umpire manual did you read that trusting a lifelong liar is sure to result in realty meeting expectations?

Human Nature 101. Money talks.

Even Trump can do the math. Pikers like Miriam and Stephen are shoe shiners in a world where oil money still stirs the drink.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For Trump, everything is very simple and very personal. If Hamas doesn't release the hostages by inauguration, Trump will feel personally attacked by Hamas. He will feel that Hamas is going out of its way to make an enemy of Donald Trump. By not cooperating and deferring to him, Trump will feel that Hamas is out to humiliate and embarrass him. And Trump regards that as unacceptable. Therefore, since Hamas made a personal enemy out of Trump, he will feel justified in using the powers of the US government to utterly crush and destroy Hamas and their backers and supporters.

For Trump, everything is personal. You'll notice the rest of the world - from France to Ukraine to Japan to Canada - are all playing along. It really does behoove Hamas and Iran to get their act together and make a plan for January 20th. Because it will be different afterwards. This is an administration that is enthusiastically pro-Israel and is looking forward to a far more confrontational approach to Iran and its allies like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.

But didn’t Trump campaign on an anti foreign wars position? So he is a liar. So then why is this not also a lie?

No country on Earth is going to war for Palestinians. It's in no one's interest. They were given an independent state in 1947 and 1993. Instead, Palestinians chose war and terrorism and endless intifada. Plus Black September and Munich and civil war in Lebanon and aiding the invasion of Kuwait and supporting 9/11 and killing a bunch of kids on 10/7 and committing war crimes in Syria in support of Assad and being a puppet of Iran.

The entire Arab world has given the green light for the destruction of Palestinians. They have been a nightmare for Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt.

The US is not getting involved with this militarily. But the fact that even Arab-Americans are voting for Trump should be a clue about how this is going to go for the next four years.

Palestinians really messed up with their choices - from the PLO to Hamas.

If Hamas releases the remaining hostages before 1/20 there might be some hope. But if they don't, it's going to get worse.

10/7 might be the dumbest thing anyone has ever done ever.

Other than rejecting resolution 181.

Palestinian leadership has been a catastrophe for the Palestinian people for 80 years and counting.

Yes they should have never allowed Jews to steal their land. Should have had secure borders in Palestine. The good news is Israel military and intelligence services have been in steep decline for decades. Only a matter of time before the wheel comes back and Israel’s fortunes fall. IDF has already suffered close to 1,000 killed and 11-12,000 wounded in Lebanon. They also publicly report that Hamas is in control of Gaza. Live by the sword die by the sword.

Yes, they should have accepted 181 b/c we've seen the alternative.

Would you choose 181 borders or the current Palestinian situation?

Patiently awaiting your response.

The rest of your post is absurd fantasy. Objectively speaking (without taking morality into account), Israel has absolutely, positively won this conflict and perhaps has further expanded its territory. Meanwhile, its only real adversary--Iran--is weakened and its proxy network devastated.

lol Israel has lost this conflict. You all got run over by a few 100 militia men with light weapons on Oct 7. What the f? The IDF can’t even secure Gaza. Hamas controls it. As for Lebanon the IDF is running for home. It took the IDF 12 years to surrender last time. This time it is a matter of months. Those are real casualties numbers with lots of equipment destroyed or damaged. Israel has suppressed this but is leaking out. Israel is alone in the Middle East and the world. Every Arab nation has pushed you all off to arm’s length and Turkey is now leading the resistance against you. Go ahead and try’s to bomb Turkey. See what happens. Your boys are having all kinds of problems.

Iran has proven they can hit targets in Israel at any time and Israel is incapable of stopping it. Israel has to rely on the US to shoot down the drone and missiles but the US did not shoot down the ballistic missiles. Soon Iran will have nuclear weapons on ballistic missiles,and the US will not think of touching them. How long can Israel remain on full deployment? Don’t you have a real economy? Israel is circling the drain and your only friend is a back stabbing Trump.

So Palestinians won?

Iran won?

Hamas won?

Hezbollah won?

[Anonymous]

I’m confused. What is Trump going to do to Hamas that hasn’t been done already? It’s not like it’s been a measured campaign so far.