Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The FAFO guy has the Krav Maga bona fides to back up his talk. Prove me wrong.
He’s an unhinged racist Zionist. Possibly also some early hair loss and trouble with women. Definitely not a father; no parent would be that sickly dehumanizing about dead children.
As opposed to those who are reduced to infantile name-calling instead of anything actually factual?
The apologists simply ignore the reality of the situation: Hamas started the current conflict and is continuing it. It cannot "win" militarily in any meaningful sense, and never could. Without Iranian support, Hamas would be completely ineffective. With such support, it is just effective enough to bring about its own destruction. Those are facts, indisputable.
Israel isn't going anywhere, and Hamas activity is merely prolonging Palestinian suffering, accomplishing nothing useful. Casualties are the consequence of Hamas actions, no more, no less. Calls for the cessation of Hamas activity and for the release of Israeli hostages are the only way to stop Palestinian suffering. Past Palestinian grievances are irrelevant in that context. Continuing to encourage Gazans to try to restore the pre-1948 status quo by force is only to encourage them to continue suicide. They need instead to envision a different future for themselves, one which is actually achievable, or else face more of what they are experiencing currently.
More Zionist lies. Israel could end their endless occupation and apartheid just as easily but won’t. Your explanation is eerily similar to how white South Africans justified their apartheid to the Blacks.
They tried withdrawal from Gaza before and it didn't work out as advertised.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_disengagement_from_the_Gaza_Strip
Israel has learned through hard bloody lessons that peace cannot be attained so easily.
So now you can call them any names you like, they don't care anymore.
They care more about their grandchildren than about your opinion.
And as you can see by the international inaction, nobody cares about your opinion anymore.
You're just chihuahuas howling at the moon.
This is war.
War is hell.
FAFO.
You didn’t read the Wikipedia that you linked.
The year of the disengagement would see the removal of 8,475 settlers from Gaza, while in that same year the number of new settlers in the West Bank increased by 15,000.[89] After Israel's disengagement, there was increased freedom of movement within Gaza due to Israel's removal of its settlements. Israel's disengagement also resulted in loss of the settlement factories, workshops, and greenhouses where Gazans were employed.[90] The year following the disengagement saw a tightening of external Israeli control over Gaza, specifically, the closure of crossings into Gaza for people and goods, increased restrictions on the coastline for fishing, and increased aerial, maritime and on the ground military activity. The Israeli human rights organization Gisha lists various examples of actions requiring Israeli permission or approval in the year following the disengagement. These restrictions include the need for Israeli permission to import basic necessities such as milk, to host foreign lecturers at universities, and register children in the Palestinian population registry. Additionally, fishermen must obtain permission to fish off Gaza's coast, and nonprofits need approval to receive tax-exempt donations. Financial transactions such as the transfer of salaries to teachers are also controlled by Israel, which affects the payment of salaries by the Palestinian Ministry of Education. Moreover, farmers require authorization to export agricultural products, and students wishing to study abroad depend on Israel's approval for the opening of the Gaza-Egypt crossing.[91]
The United Nations, international human rights organizations and many legal scholars regard the Gaza Strip to still be under military occupation by Israel.[13] The International Court of Justice reaffirmed this position, stating that the occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip are unlawful and its discriminatory laws and policies against Palestinians violate the prohibition on racial segregation and apartheid. The ICJ rejected the claim that Gaza was no longer occupied following the 2005 disengagement, on the basis of Israel's continued control over the Gaza Strip.[108][109]
In Jaber Al-Bassiouni Ahmed v. The Prime Minister, the Israeli Supreme Court assumed that occupation had ended with the disengagement but did not explain the theory or facts that led to this conclusion.[110][111] After the disengagement, Israel claimed that its occupation of Gaza had ended, but also acknowledged that Gaza was not a sovereign state. It labeled Gaza as a "hostile entity," a status that neither grants Palestinians the right to self-governance and self-protection, nor obliges Israel to protect Gaza's civilian population. Israel uses this argument to deny Palestinians of full self-governance as well as the use of military force to suppress any resistance to Israeli control.[112]
Following the withdrawal, Israel continued to maintain direct control over Gaza's air and maritime space, six of Gaza's seven land crossings, maintains a no-go buffer zone within the territory, controls the Palestinian population registry, and Gaza remains dependent on Israel for its water, electricity, telecommunications, and other utilities.[13][113]
You can scream and cry all you want with your FAFO vulgarity but people like me will always be here to put the facts back in your face (and everyone else’s).