Where did he say that naturalized citizens are the target of his policy? |
What about orange-skinned felons? |
Oh, you have not been paying attention. Nobody said that everybody in these groups WOULD be deported, just that they COULD, if Trump's administration follows through. Have a wrong sounding name? Wrong skin? Maybe a job that someone else wants? PP, you don't have to deport 48 million in order to deport 480,000. Come on -- you know better than to self-soothe with a thesis that holds no water. |
Welp, there it is. |
I understand these are extremely vile people but they are not completely brainless. Deporting all the naturalized citizens? Have you lost your mind? Elections are won by creating economic prosperity, once economy is gone then there's no winning. |
I'm sorry I thought you guys said Trump jokes a lot. So how do we know he's not joking and really means every person has the ability to be denaturalized? I mean that's the rub with him right? You never know what the hell he's talking about or what the hell he is going to do. To be honest I don't even think he knows half the time |
Let's hope that you haven't made any neighbors or any co-workers mad because I can 100% guarantee you there is going to be a snitch line for this |
Follows through what, exactly? Please explain the details of the exact threat to naturalized citizens. |
Stop fear mongering, this already caused Democrats to lose the election. |
You know dangood and well. They have talked about denaturalizing American citizens to deport them.... If you don't want to believe it, that's fine. But I'm not going to sit here and bring out project 2025 and highlight every area that's going to impact your life. Either you figure it out or don't I really don't care. Like I said, I'm white and I really am nothing to worry about |
Nobody said all naturalized citizens would necessarily be deported. The officials involved get to selectively enforce, PP, just like they did in Trump's first term. But this time, no guardrails. |
I have a feeling the denaturalization of citizens is going to be highly targeted based on who's Trump's enemies are and whether or not they work for someone or a company who he sees as a competitor. So depending where you work or what you do you could be fine but enough to where I would be able to sleep peacefully every night for 4 years. No?. |
Just stop. No one is taking anyone’s legal citizenship away. Honestly - do you people even hear yourselves? The main focus of deportation efforts will be illegal immigrants who also have criminal records. But of course, Democrats will be fighting for their “rights.” So typical. ![]() |
You are the one scaring already every anxious people and making outrageous claim that they need to prepare for deportation. The burden of proof is on you. Nevertheless, I looked at "project 2025", a 900 page document which I am sure you read very closely, and this is what I found: "At a minimum, pursue through rulemaking—and in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security where appropriate—the promulgation of every rule related to immigration that was issued during the Trump Administration. Such rulemakings include guidance on continuances in immigration court cases, eligibility for asylum, and other related matters. However, the DOJ should not stop there: It should continually evaluate its authorities and operational reality within the immigration court system and promulgate regulations accordingly. Commit sufficient resources to the adjudication of cases in the immigration court system in different environments (for example, in the context of the Migrant Protection Protocols). l Pursue proactive litigation to advance the federal government’s interests in areas where erroneous precedent curtails authorities provided by Congress (for example, by pursuing the overturning of the Flores Settlement Agreement). Pursue aggressive enforcement of the immigration laws within the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division to ensure that no American citizen is discriminated against in the employment context in favor of a temporary or foreign worker.96 l Ensure the deployment and use of appointees throughout the department who are committed to successful achievement of the department’s immigration-related missions. the DOJ should not stop there: It should continually evaluate its authorities and operational reality within the immigration court system and promulgate regulations accordingly. Commit sufficient resources to the adjudication of cases in the immigration court system in different environments (for example, in the context of the Migrant Protection Protocols). Pursue proactive litigation to advance the federal government’s interests in areas where erroneous precedent curtails authorities provided by Congress (for example, by pursuing the overturning of the Flores Settlement Agreement). Pursue aggressive enforcement of the immigration laws within the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division to ensure that no American citizen is discriminated against in the employment context in favor of a temporary or foreign worker. Ensure the deployment and use of appointees throughout the department who are committed to successful achievement of the department’s immigration-related missions. This includes personnel in or overseeing not only the EOIR, but also the Office of the Attorney General, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Associate Attorney General, Office of the Solicitor General, and nearly every other component/ office throughout the department. Pursue a more vigorous anti-fraud program within the EOIR. In perhaps no other area of law are there more attorneys who commit acts of fraud against their clients—advancing completely meritless arguments in exchange for exorbitant fees—than there are in the area of immigration. Fraud and unethical behavior are rampant in the immigration system and must be addressed—not only to ensure that the federal government is operating in a proper manner, but also for the sake of the aliens involved in the process as well as the integrity/credibility of the members of the private immigration bar who do not engage in such conduct. " So, it's all about enforcing existing laws, and making sure there are sufficient resources to do so. Oh, there is not a single mention of "naturalized citizens" throughout the 900 pages. |
Start with rolling back the "rights" they already have and have been exercising for hundreds of years. The right of a naturalized citizen to vote in a federal election was already challenged this year in Iowa. In Ohio, naturalized citizens can be forced to submit extra paperwork to vote. North Carolina voted to take the language of a right to vote including "naturalized" citizens out of the state constitution, even though the law itself didn't change -- just the specific assurance. For no particular purpose, of course. I'm sure all of this is random, aren't you? We just happen to be targeting naturalized citizens for no reason at all. it will stop there. Obviously. |