Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Even if that were accurate (I sense Meghan treats him much better and with far more kindness and respect than William ever has), if it's what he prefers what's wrong with that? Why should his obligation to serve his family trump his personal preference? I mean I guess if you actually believe the British monarch is ordained by God to rule (or rather, to figurehead in contemporary England) then Harry has a religious obligation. But if you don't believe in that fairytale then he's just a guy from a wealthy family who didn't want to go into the family businesses and work for his dad and brother. Who cares? |
+1 |
Yes obviously it’s much more civilized to do so through anonymous sources in the tabloids. |
👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽 |
Only polite pleasantries would be appropriate when interacting with family members who have shown they'll say anything to the media. |
| All this fighting. The bottom line is both sides are not perfect. You can point fingers but if you step back, regardless of who’s at fault, it’s obvious the relationship is past the point of reconciliation. |
PP and others care because Harry chose to marry a Black woman who wouldn’t put up with the firm’s BS like other vapid members of the royal family. PP is angry that Meg showed Harry that he doesn’t have to put up that behavior, and that Harry left that toxic environment to protect his and his wife’s mental health. [NP] |
Sooo...for both of them (except for their moms), their families are "disgusting" and only useful as objects of criticism from them--for which they get paid huge sums of money. Lovely. |
Camilla and William have shown they'll say (via "palace insiders" if necessary) anything to the media in return for positive coverage. Your point? |
| If saying happy birthday dislodges this big of an uproar it’s the most I’m saying or doing. |
Agree both sides are imperfect. Camila and William shouldn't have leaked to the tabloids. And whether or not Harry tried to get Charles to stop them, Harry shouldn't have published a book to get even. But there's another problem too, and that's the everyday racism and/or spiteful childishness towards H and M in Britain that this white daughter of a British mom notices when she goes back to visit cousins. 10:55 from last night is typical of the hundreds of incredibly childish and hateful posts you'll find in the comments section of the Daily Mail ( , embarrassed that I sometimes read it). 10:55 is bad on so many dimensions that it's worth going back to read. As someone with a British parent and British relatives, I'm really disappointed in the British public and, obviously, in some juvenile Americans. This obviously isn't to say there's no racism or childish behavior in the US, because 10:55 definitely demonstrates it. It's just to say that whatever happened with Charles and William leaking to the tabloids, this banal, everyday racism and/or spiteful childishness also makes Britain a really inhospitable place for Harry and Meghan.
|
Just make sure you sign the card (unlike William and Catherine) and all will be well. It's the lack of signatures that caused the "uproar." |
No, read the comments. They’re all over the place. |
I don’t disagree with you it’s toxic. I just think reconciliation isn’t happening. These discussions never go anywhere and severing the relationship is better than this annual reviving of the past. Britain may have casual racism issues, as does the US. There are many forums for making it better including non-profits and other organizations. A broken family relationship is not a productive forum. |
My point is I wouldn't trust any family member or "friend" who would go to the very public media and get paid for trashing me in a book and on television. Perhaps you are okay with that way of dealing with family. There's a reason Harry and Meghan don't have close family relationships. |