Forum Index
»
Childcare other than Daycare and Preschool
I posted above that OP and other parent need to adjust their work schedule this summer to get their kid to camp, assuming it’s important to still go to this camp. I also posted that OP should not avoid the natural consequences here, which is people who aren’t your family don’t want to drive you when you break their trust like this. I don’t think that’s holier than thou - it’s just life given where they are right now. |
But she is. -Kid carries drugs -Nanny finds out -OP "deals" with kid -Op expects nanny to continue on, not knowing if he will be carrying drugs again and putting her at risk OP already knows her kid is a drug risk, how can she guarantee nanny will be safe? How many "strikes" does kid need before OP is knowingly using nanny as drug mule? |
The Nanny can watch the kid, at home. Sitting at home, and being watched, sounds like exactly what this kid needs right now. |
Has OP instituted any of the things your mentioned? Doesn’t sound like it. All I read from op is that she wants the nanny to suck it up and that “the kid has been dealt with.” The nanny is smarter than the op honestly because she knows that kid will have pot on him at some point again. So yes, without having done anything to prevent the teen from having pot on him in nanny’s car, she is asking her to break the law. |
Okay so you offered actual an actual solution (which appears to be no longer employing the nanny in favor of the parents managing transportation). Not sure if that is an effective natural consequence for the teen since it’s the parents being inconvenienced, not the kid, but at least it’s an actual recommendation. But so many other PPs didn’t offer anything except omg your kid is awful, you are awful, I’m “team nanny” (what does this mean as a practical manner?), your son should apologize, etc. It’s all emotional reactions without any substance. There’s no point except for those posters to feel morally superior as they pound their keyboards. |
Great. OP can offer that to the nanny. But I wonder if a nanny who is used to driving and cooking is going to want to sit in a house tethered to a teen? |
| Your nanny is 100% in the right here. Not getting rides to his activities sounds like a very good way to punish your child for possessing marijuana. |
And the lawyer will tell her that when you’re the driver of a car with passengers, and one is found in possession of drugs, you can be charged with constructive drug possession because you have control and dominion over the vehicle (and the minor child in this case). More problematic, when the drug holder tosses the drugs on the floor "not mine!" -- that can be straight up possession for everyone in the car. Whether or not local law enforcement will bother with this charge is another matter, and whether or not a case can be proven after the long process of a arrest, arraignment, plea bargaining, and trial is also another matter (it isn't easy to prove), but you are playing roulette with the driver's freedom and record and ability to get another job. Given that the minor child will likely face zero consequences, they are more likely to go after the adult in the car. OP, this applies to you driving your kid around too. Can your career take this hit? BTW folks, if your kids drive their friends around, they should know this too -- also can apply to open containers of alcohol and guns. |
She asked advice on how to reassure the nanny. That advice can include things like drug testing, drug searches, etc. |
Since nanny is the one who doesn’t want to drive, that seems like it would be fine with her. Since the nanny also makes meals, DS can learn to cook instead this summer. |
|
If your kid is capable of buying weed, then he is capable of getting himself to and from school and after school activities.
|
OP hasn’t said which jurisdiction she is in, we don’t even know if weed possession is illegal there. |
Kid has to deal with his parents who will likely be more upset at him now that his behavior actually inconveniences them. I suspect it will actually both more unpleasant initially and then very good for DS to have a little alone time each day with a parent. |
It's still likely child endangerment having it in the car with OP's little innocent angel. |
It is still a federal offense. Criminal Penalties for Simple Possession, 21 U.S.C.A. § 844 Also, is it legal anywhere for a minor? |