To be frank, these are poor gpas for a top school and do indicate grade deflation. Attended a peer school a notch or two above Davidson and getting a 3.6 means you were a pretty bad student or just didn't like using resources. The trend has been going towards average gpas of 3.7 up at many schools. I have friends who attended Davidson, who called their time without Greek life pretty "oppressive." Have you been eating up the words of tour guides or students, because there's typically a severe difference in the realities. Neighbor growing up was a Kappa at Davidson and told stories that made you think he went to Bama. |
Most schools don’t publish easily accessible information about their graduating student profile, so kudos to Davidson for doing that. Because so many schools, don’t publish this data, it’s unclear where the PP got their data about other schools. However, a simple prompt in ChatGPT for the average GPA of graduates from liberal arts schools turned up numbers closer to 3.5. Separately, here’s a somewhat dated (2021) article from Williams about grade inflation. In 2019, their average GPA was 3.52. https://williamsrecord.com/455518/news/grade-inflation-continues-rise-through-fall-semester-some-professors-say/ |
I'm not sure how this is inflation versus bouncing back from poor grading standards. You cannot compete in the grad school market anymore with a 3.5, and GPAs have began to reflect it. |
Williams and Davidson graduates go to great graduate schools, but the point here is that Davidson's average GPA is not depressed or deflated relative to its peers. |
| If your DS ends up wanting a SLAC, he’d have a great chance with Middlebury ED2 based on our DDs experience (Unhooked, full pay, solid gpa/test, basic strong extracurriculars, etc…) |
are you referring to you and your friends time as college students? can you put a date on that because a lot has changed, unless you're 23yo |
27, so not that divorced from college. Graduated right before the pandemic, but can’t imagine that that reduced scores, rather than shot them up. Looking at my college now, and if you want to be in the top 25% of the class you need a 4.0 GPA, so I think it’s about the same if not worse than before |
| DS grad 2022 from Davidson with degree in Econ and Comp Sci. Works at a FAANG company. Heading to Yale Law in August. Selected Davidson over many schools, including Ivies. Amazing experience, even through Covid. Cannot recommend more highly. Although challenging, DS aced the LSAT, and was admitted to multiple law schools. He did not have a 4.0 but really learned and absolutely loved his classes. The PP who claims that the school is oppressive is just plain wrong. |
| Today’s lesson for DCUM: perspective. Are we all going to act like a Yale law student is the average Davidson grad? Challenging environments are amazing as your intelligence and can be pretty miserable if you’re the type who can’t keep up. Same hint happens on these forums when discussing UChicago- great college if you’re academic good, horribly oppressive for many |
| According to PP’s warped standards, every top school is oppressive. In my experience, top schools attract amazing students. They come to learn and appreciate the intellectual challenge. They also want to be surrounded by intelligent peers. They find the environment stimulating rather than oppressive. Not everyone can cut it, but those that do self select. Those that don’t have a wide variety of less rigorous options. |
| I know a ton of kids at Davidson and wouldn’t say it is oppressive academically. Quite a few find it oppressive socially, as a good number of the kids aren’t very social and it’s just small. But I hear similar complaints about Middlebury. I think it’s a downside of SLACs generally and kids who want a more active social/party scene should pick bigger schools. |
|
Some of it depends on how you want to use your ED/how long you want the process to last. Some people choose to ED a far reach knowing odds are low, but ED would help a little—they may get deferred but the school will know they are serious about it and they are up for working off a deferral/waitlist—others really want to be done with the process early and ED a lower reach/target.
Pay attention to the percent of students admitted ED—it’s notoriously high at some schools (Middlebury/Tulane come to mind). I feel Vandy might be up there too. Also pay attention to the number of ED1 spots and if the school counts athletes in ED1. I personally would not waste an ED1 on a smaller school that has few spots with athletics in the mix unless it is by far the top choice school and you’re ok having a longer process. Good luck! |
|
want to underscore the lopsided numbers at SLACS is very much rooted in athletics. Some of these schools are 30% or more athletes. And yes, even if they're not recruited, the readers know to look for kids to fill out that women's hockey team etc. There are just a lot of positions that need to be filled.
look at all these preppy white faces! https://athletics.middlebury.edu/sports/football/roster https://athletics.middlebury.edu/sports/baseball/roster https://athletics.middlebury.edu/sports/fhockey/roster https://athletics.middlebury.edu/sports/wswim/roster https://athletics.middlebury.edu/sports/softball/roster https://athletics.middlebury.edu/sports/mcross/roster https://athletics.middlebury.edu/sports/wsquash/roster https://athletics.middlebury.edu/sports/mhockey/roster and on and on and on .. they're ALL like this |
This is why if you're interested in diversity and less athlete culture, you apply to the Claremont Colleges. Otherwise, prepare for New England Boarding School |
Do you have an issue with athletes for some reason? Most SLACs, including Middlebury, are D3. It’s significantly less intense than D1 athletics, both in terms of team training and recruiting. Davidson is D1 and I have heard there is a divide there between athletes and non athletes, but not to the extent the non-athletes are unhappy. |