Has Prince William visited Kate again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like he used a back door the only time we know he visited. They just briefly caught him driving out from a gated area — he didn’t go in the front entrance. So unless there’s some network of underground tunnels, he hasn’t been back.

There's always another way in.

Isn’t there a platform 9 3/4 around there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've heard speculation that the family leaked rumors that QEII was mad about H&M calling their DD Lillibet shortly before it was announced that Kate was in the hospital, intentionally to try and distract people from focusing on what is obviously a major medical issue that the BRF, for whatever reason, doesn't want to disclose.

And there are many reasons not to disclose details about an ongoing health issue! I recently had a major health concern and I was very private about it and most people didn't know, and even people I told, I didn't share details because it was very personal. But it is very weird how the BRF always seems to have some negative detail about H&M anytime they want to distract the press from something else.

Eh, I don’t think so.

I think it’s more plausible that the Queen was irritated that her pet name—the one thing that belonged to her and was unique to her—was going to be used by them. She was definitely put on the spot. Had she said no, it’s reasonable to worry they would tell the press and color her legacy.

That’s more plausible than the BRF concocting and leaking this story before surgery.

Plus, it’s possible they didn’t have a lot of lead time on the surgery.

[Anonymous]

It would be interesting to know what the Queen thought. Hard to imagine taking an intimate pet name like that. I wouldn’t even want to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It would be interesting to know what the Queen thought. Hard to imagine taking an intimate pet name like that. I wouldn’t even want to.

It’s reasonable to assume she was annoyed that some American kid in California completely detached from the BRF would have her pet name. Even worse: the notion they would profit from it somehow.

[Anonymous]

Anyway, I wonder when they’ll make another announcement about Kate. I feel like most people are waiting for some development here. It’s kind of expected they’ll say when she leaves the hospital- then we know it’ll be 3 months til she does an appearance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like he used a back door the only time we know he visited. They just briefly caught him driving out from a gated area — he didn’t go in the front entrance. So unless there’s some network of underground tunnels, he hasn’t been back.

There's always another way in.

Isn’t there a platform 9 3/4 around there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t it be great if he could just go visit his wife and the kids could visit their mom without OP needing to know about it?

The hospital does not allow children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be interesting to know what the Queen thought. Hard to imagine taking an intimate pet name like that. I wouldn’t even want to.

It’s reasonable to assume she was annoyed that some American kid in California completely detached from the BRF would have her pet name. Even worse: the notion they would profit from it somehow.

Some American kid? You mean the king's granddaughter, a blood princess?

Lol I love you delusional trolls who think you have more of a claim to the BRF than a literal Princess. Also that story has been walked back and now it's claimed she never cared. Almost like people are using a child to justify their own issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've heard speculation that the family leaked rumors that QEII was mad about H&M calling their DD Lillibet shortly before it was announced that Kate was in the hospital, intentionally to try and distract people from focusing on what is obviously a major medical issue that the BRF, for whatever reason, doesn't want to disclose.

And there are many reasons not to disclose details about an ongoing health issue! I recently had a major health concern and I was very private about it and most people didn't know, and even people I told, I didn't share details because it was very personal. But it is very weird how the BRF always seems to have some negative detail about H&M anytime they want to distract the press from something else.

Eh, I don’t think so.

I think it’s more plausible that the Queen was irritated that her pet name—the one thing that belonged to her and was unique to her—was going to be used by them. She was definitely put on the spot. Had she said no, it’s reasonable to worry they would tell the press and color her legacy.

That’s more plausible than the BRF concocting and leaking this story before surgery.

Plus, it’s possible they didn’t have a lot of lead time on the surgery.

It's reasonable to think she might have been bothered by it. It's also possible she was honored by it. I really don't know. I found the choice to use a pet name kind of weird, but I just assumed they had QEII's blessing.

But yes, the timing of the "leak" is suspicious because (1) this all happened a while ago, it was weird it would be in the news now, and (2) the nature of the "leak" was weird -- they claim QEII said something like "this name is all I have" which is both false and weirdly self-pitying in a way that QEII never was.

So even if I think there might have been some family drama around their choice to use that name, I found the timing of the leaked comments suspicious when they were immediately followed up by the announcements of both Charles' and Kate's hospital stayed. Especially Kate's since obviously they are being circumspect about it and clearly would like to deflect from it. The palace has a clear history of using negative rumors about Harry (and now H&M) to detract from anything they don't people to know or discuss regarding William or Will & Kate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be interesting to know what the Queen thought. Hard to imagine taking an intimate pet name like that. I wouldn’t even want to.

It’s reasonable to assume she was annoyed that some American kid in California completely detached from the BRF would have her pet name. Even worse: the notion they would profit from it somehow.

Some American kid? You mean the king's granddaughter, a blood princess?

Lol I love you delusional trolls who think you have more of a claim to the BRF than a literal Princess. Also that story has been walked back and now it's claimed she never cared. Almost like people are using a child to justify their own issues.

Isn’t she an American kid growing up in Montecito? She will be educated in the USA and won’t attend any Royal functions. I mean, her father…the King’s son…doesn’t attend events anymore.

It was nervy of them to use the Queen’s pet name. And I bet they will trademark the name and somehow commercialize it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be interesting to know what the Queen thought. Hard to imagine taking an intimate pet name like that. I wouldn’t even want to.

It’s reasonable to assume she was annoyed that some American kid in California completely detached from the BRF would have her pet name. Even worse: the notion they would profit from it somehow.

Some American kid? You mean the king's granddaughter, a blood princess?

Lol I love you delusional trolls who think you have more of a claim to the BRF than a literal Princess. Also that story has been walked back and now it's claimed she never cared. Almost like people are using a child to justify their own issues.

Isn’t she an American kid growing up in Montecito? She will be educated in the USA and won’t attend any Royal functions. I mean, her father…the King’s son…doesn’t attend events anymore.

It was nervy of them to use the Queen’s pet name. And I bet they will trademark the name and somehow commercialize it

Wow you really have an in on the inner feelings of the royal family! You should be a reporter!

And you're right, I bet they monetize it. That's why we've seen three pictures of the child in her whole life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be interesting to know what the Queen thought. Hard to imagine taking an intimate pet name like that. I wouldn’t even want to.

It’s reasonable to assume she was annoyed that some American kid in California completely detached from the BRF would have her pet name. Even worse: the notion they would profit from it somehow.

Some American kid? You mean the king's granddaughter, a blood princess?

Lol I love you delusional trolls who think you have more of a claim to the BRF than a literal Princess. Also that story has been walked back and now it's claimed she never cared. Almost like people are using a child to justify their own issues.

She has a dork, stupid, purloined nickname for a name, appears to have her bankrupt grandfathers face, and hs literally no relationship to her rich grandfather. Oh I meant to either grandfather. Now that is competent parenting!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be interesting to know what the Queen thought. Hard to imagine taking an intimate pet name like that. I wouldn’t even want to.

It’s reasonable to assume she was annoyed that some American kid in California completely detached from the BRF would have her pet name. Even worse: the notion they would profit from it somehow.

Some American kid? You mean the king's granddaughter, a blood princess?

Lol I love you delusional trolls who think you have more of a claim to the BRF than a literal Princess. Also that story has been walked back and now it's claimed she never cared. Almost like people are using a child to justify their own issues.

Isn’t she an American kid growing up in Montecito? She will be educated in the USA and won’t attend any Royal functions. I mean, her father…the King’s son…doesn’t attend events anymore.

It was nervy of them to use the Queen’s pet name. And I bet they will trademark the name and somehow commercialize it

Wow you really have an in on the inner feelings of the royal family! You should be a reporter!

And you're right, I bet they monetize it. That's why we've seen three pictures of the child in her whole life.

No pictures until after eye patching or surgery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be interesting to know what the Queen thought. Hard to imagine taking an intimate pet name like that. I wouldn’t even want to.

It’s reasonable to assume she was annoyed that some American kid in California completely detached from the BRF would have her pet name. Even worse: the notion they would profit from it somehow.

Some American kid? You mean the king's granddaughter, a blood princess?

Lol I love you delusional trolls who think you have more of a claim to the BRF than a literal Princess. Also that story has been walked back and now it's claimed she never cared. Almost like people are using a child to justify their own issues.

She has a dork, stupid, purloined nickname for a name, appears to have her bankrupt grandfathers face, and hs literally no relationship to her rich grandfather. Oh I meant to either grandfather. Now that is competent parenting!

The face that you can write this kind of vitriol about a literal toddler is actually really sad. I hope you find peace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be interesting to know what the Queen thought. Hard to imagine taking an intimate pet name like that. I wouldn’t even want to.

It’s reasonable to assume she was annoyed that some American kid in California completely detached from the BRF would have her pet name. Even worse: the notion they would profit from it somehow.

Some American kid? You mean the king's granddaughter, a blood princess?

Lol I love you delusional trolls who think you have more of a claim to the BRF than a literal Princess. Also that story has been walked back and now it's claimed she never cared. Almost like people are using a child to justify their own issues.

Isn’t she an American kid growing up in Montecito? She will be educated in the USA and won’t attend any Royal functions. I mean, her father…the King’s son…doesn’t attend events anymore.

It was nervy of them to use the Queen’s pet name. And I bet they will trademark the name and somehow commercialize it

Wow you really have an in on the inner feelings of the royal family! You should be a reporter!

And you're right, I bet they monetize it. That's why we've seen three pictures of the child in her whole life.

No pictures until after eye patching or surgery.

Who hurt you?