I want a candidate who is 100% pro-choice BUT pretty anti-immigration & socially conservative

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think that IVF should only be legal for women under 40.

But no age constraints for men? Interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that IVF should only be legal for women under 40.

But no age constraints for men? Interesting.

Bet that poster nas not a clue about the high percentage of infertility cases that are due to a male factor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Agreed. I'm an Independent and in some ways, one would think I'm conservative because of all these things; pro-police, strong border control, thinks trans women have no place in women's sports.. However, I am pro-choice and very much pro-gun control. I feel like I don't have a home in either party.

I don’t think trans women belong in women’s sports either but I’m smart enough to notice that republicans don’t otherwise care about or support women’s athletics; they’re using it as a wedge issue to begin attacking trans rights altogether and then on to attacking gay rights. LGBTQIA+ deserve human rights. See the long game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that IVF should only be legal for women under 40.

But no age constraints for men? Interesting.

Men aren’t giving birth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that IVF should only be legal for women under 40.

But no age constraints for men? Interesting. [/quote
Men aren’t giving birth.

Their old genes result in a lot of autistic kids

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that IVF should only be legal for women under 40.

But no age constraints for men? Interesting.

Men aren’t giving birth.

Poster was talking about IVF. IVF procedures require sperm , fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Agreed. I'm an Independent and in some ways, one would think I'm conservative because of all these things; pro-police, strong border control, thinks trans women have no place in women's sports.. However, I am pro-choice and very much pro-gun control. I feel like I don't have a home in either party.

I don’t think trans women belong in women’s sports either but I’m smart enough to notice that republicans don’t otherwise care about or support women’s athletics; they’re using it as a wedge issue to begin attacking trans rights altogether and then on to attacking gay rights. LGBTQIA+ deserve human rights. See the long game.

We need where to go that is not GOP, but also not the Democratic Party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any possible candidates?

If you ever find one I would got for them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that IVF should only be legal for women under 40.

I think you should seek IVF or any other medical procedure with the advice and counsel of your doc and stay out of it with regards to other people's medical issues. Not your concern. I can't imagine inserting myself into your personal medical decisions.

Not your problem until a parent dies and leaves IVF kids to be foster kids or whatever happens to kids whose parents die and they have nobody to take care of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that IVF should only be legal for women under 40.

I think you should seek IVF or any other medical procedure with the advice and counsel of your doc and stay out of it with regards to other people's medical issues. Not your concern. I can't imagine inserting myself into your personal medical decisions.

Not your problem until a parent dies and leaves IVF kids to be foster kids or whatever happens to kids whose parents die and they have nobody to take care of them.

You also gonna ban any natural pregnancies in women over 40?

[Anonymous]

Socially conservative = bigot. Your time is over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that IVF should only be legal for women under 40.

But no age constraints for men? Interesting.

Men aren’t giving birth.

What does IVF have to do with giving birth and age? What is the specific issue for you?

Age of mother? What women >40 about adopting infants?

Age of eggs? What about donor eggs?

What about men >40? Can they become a father to infants? Can they donate sperm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Socially conservative = bigot. Your time is over.

You're a huge reason why Dems get a bad rep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.

DP. That's why I would consider Bill Clinton an ideal candidate. I'm also a Republican and I'm pro-choice, as well as all the other things PP listed.

Ok. You're a republican that supports democratic candidates. Whatever you want to call yourself I guess.

Wrong. You seem confused. I'm a Republican who is pro-choice. I'm also not a one-issue voter, as I used to be, so abortion is no longer the only issue I care about. Democrats are NOT "pro-police, tough on crime, serious about border control, cutting the deficit," and they have totally gone off the cliff when it comes to social issues. There is no modern-day Democrat I would ever consider voting for.
PP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope.

Your options are pro-life/Christian Nationalism, or else democrats.

Nope. The options are fascist, speech-policing imbeciles, or else Republicans.
DP

So no choice at all, is what you are saying.

Democrats certainly don't offer a "choice" when it comes to speaking and opinions. There is only your way, or the highway. I'll take the highway, thanks.

Because the GOP is so very open to diverse opinions.