I am free to be non-religious and the constitution gives me that right because the state is not allowed to establish a religion. |
You misunderstood the WMD claim. |
The Wall Street Journal just pushed it out to me too. |
This isn't an argument about history. It's a semantic thing. Do you know what that means? Value: something (such as a principle or quality) intrinsically valuable or desirable. Religion: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices; the service and worship of God or the supernatural That is to say, "religion" is concrete, it has structure, it's a thing. It's not correct grammar to say religion is a value. Kindness is a value. Honesty is a value. Generosity is a value. Empathy is a value. Now if you want to say that religion is valued by many Americans. Sure thing. Or that faith is a core American value, well that is an argument you could make that isn't semantically wrong. Of course, faith and religion are not the same thing, grammatically speaking (and otherwise). --Editor who knows the English language |
This. It's sad how many people completely ignore the establishment clause because it's the opposite of what they think the First Amendment should be. |
What do you know about reproduction? How many pregnancies have you carried to term? How many have you miscarried? Have you experienced infertility? For how long? Have you experienced an ectopic pregnancy? Have you been impregnated by a rapist? Tell us all about your expertise with human reproduction and abortion |
I suppose I will be extraordinarily precise. Freedom from religion is NOT sufficient for religious freedom. It is only a part. The rest of religious freedom is freedom to practice your chosen religion. We have countries with freedom from religion, but I wouldn't say they had religious freedom. |
|
The posts here are wild. It’s like people think crime rate hasn’t been higher before, and disbelief in mythical religion is its own religion. This reminds of the terrorists that call themselves “patriots.”
If anyone is wondering why these words are charged, there’s no need to look further than this thread. |
That's great, but does it make religion a core American value? The First Amendment also gives us the freedom to peacefully assemble...but just because we're free to do so, does that make it a core American value too? |
|
The topic of this thread is closely related to yesterday’s shooting in Tennessee.
They are related. |
The Bill of Rights are core American values. Those are the rights granted to American citizens. The Constitution said little about individual rights until the Amendments. Without it we would be just another banana republic where citizen rights depend on the mood of the current government and whatever state of emergency is currently in place. I gather you are suffering from a modern public education where all good flows from federal largesse. |
I gather you are one of those parents who thinks they should be able to tell teachers how to do their jobs. Maybe while you're at it you should tell your surgeon how to operate or your pilot how to fly the plane. |
Have you even for one second stopped to reflect on the validity of your claim? Animal sacrifice is not legal yet it is part of some religions. Drug use is not legal even though it is a part of some religions. Polygamy is not legal even though it is a part of some religions. We do not have nor have ever had religious freedom in the USA. We have a right to be free of government sponsored religion. That’s the extent of it. Anything else can be outlawed. |
Citizen rights DO depend on the mood of the government. When has that not been true in the USA? Slavery? Government. Drug use? Government. Abortion? Government. Gay marriage? Government. Women voting? Government. On and on and on. I am so suck of the fairytale understanding of history by Republicans. They read the constitution like they do the bible. Anything can be justifies if you twist the logic enough. |
Someone forgot their colonial history. Several states were founded as religious colonies. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel01.html#:~:text=The%20New%20England%20colonies%2C%20New,way%20they%20believed%20to%20be Here's the library of congress's position: The New England colonies, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland were conceived and established "as plantations of religion." Some settlers who arrived in these areas came for secular motives--"to catch fish" as one New Englander put it--but the great majority left Europe to worship God in the way they believed to be correct. They enthusiastically supported the efforts of their leaders to create "a city on a hill" or a "holy experiment," whose success would prove that God's plan for his churches could be successfully realized in the American wilderness. Even colonies like Virginia, which were planned as commercial ventures, were led by entrepreneurs who considered themselves "militant Protestants" and who worked diligently to promote the prosperity of the church. People forget that the 1st amendment wasn't binding on the states at the time of the founding. Many states had different established state churches that eventually were disestablished by the 1840s. |