Why have conservatives become such mean spirited bigots?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DP. Now y'all are being silly.

ONLY certain female parts (a) produce eggs, (b) give birth, and (c) provide milk to newborns. ONLY a certain male part can produce stuff to fertilize an egg. A FEW men are physically larger and SOME men stronger, but I've also met women bodybuilders who are stronger than the majority of males out there and can kick their butt.

In the case of transgender, A FEW have physical capabilities of both male and female. In the case of gay or lesbian, it is more of a mental attraction / difference (versus a physical difference).

Short of that, the physiology, intellect, etc. of men, women, transexuals, gay, etc. don't differ that much and could be considered nearly identical.

If someone wants to deny the existence or reality of transgender, gay/lesbian, giving birth, etc., y'all aren't living in the real world. You need to grow up and learn how to deal with it.

So you've reduced women to body parts. Wow. Us uterus-havers had better sit down and shut up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DP. Now y'all are being silly.

ONLY certain female parts (a) produce eggs, (b) give birth, and (c) provide milk to newborns. ONLY a certain male part can produce stuff to fertilize an egg. A FEW men are physically larger and SOME men stronger, but I've also met women bodybuilders who are stronger than the majority of males out there and can kick their butt.

In the case of transgender, A FEW have physical capabilities of both male and female. In the case of gay or lesbian, it is more of a mental attraction / difference (versus a physical difference).

Short of that, the physiology, intellect, etc. of men, women, transexuals, gay, etc. don't differ that much and could be considered nearly identical.

If someone wants to deny the existence or reality of transgender, gay/lesbian, giving birth, etc., y'all aren't living in the real world. You need to grow up and learn how to deal with it.

You must be a man. Every woman knows that 90% of men are physically stronger than 90% of women. The fact that there are rare very strong women does not comfort the bulk of women.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s see, why am I a ‘mean spirited bigot’

1) being forced to ‘bow’ to people I don’t even know because they are of a different race. Last I checked, that was a very bad thing.

Let's take these one be one. Can you please provide an example of when you have been forced to "bow' to someone because they are a different race?

People eating at Cafes were accosted by members of BLM and made to raise a fist, under threat of physical violence.

People being forced to take a knee in solidarity

Your answer is that you have in fact not been forced to "bow" to anyone, but that you do know of an incident in which other people were also not forced to "bow"? Powerful argument.

“Bow” was in quotes. MAGA fans aren’t mad about literal “bowing.” They’re upset that measures are taken to ensure that colleges have some diversity. They’re upset that discrimination in hiring is forbidden. They’re upset that minority voters might swing an election. In a nutshell, they’re upset that being white isn’t as much of an advantage as it once was.

That's probably true and, if so, they should just say that. But instead they are arguing that all of them are oppressed because someone got their dinner interrupted in DC last summer.

If you are asking if I have an issue with Asians being discriminated against when it comes to entry into colleges (ex: Berkeley “we have enough Asians, we’d be all Asian), yes I do. And I’m *gasp* Anglo-Saxon white!

Actually, I wasn't asking anything remotely like that. But, "Asians are getting discriminated against so we should prohibit transgender pilots" is some amazing logic.

I never made that link

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s see, why am I a ‘mean spirited bigot’

1) being forced to ‘bow’ to people I don’t even know because they are of a different race. Last I checked, that was a very bad thing.

Let's take these one be one. Can you please provide an example of when you have been forced to "bow' to someone because they are a different race?

People eating at Cafes were accosted by members of BLM and made to raise a fist, under threat of physical violence.

People being forced to take a knee in solidarity

Your answer is that you have in fact not been forced to "bow" to anyone, but that you do know of an incident in which other people were also not forced to "bow"? Powerful argument.

“Bow” was in quotes. MAGA fans aren’t mad about literal “bowing.” They’re upset that measures are taken to ensure that colleges have some diversity. They’re upset that discrimination in hiring is forbidden. They’re upset that minority voters might swing an election. In a nutshell, they’re upset that being white isn’t as much of an advantage as it once was.

That's probably true and, if so, they should just say that. But instead they are arguing that all of them are oppressed because someone got their dinner interrupted in DC last summer.

If you are asking if I have an issue with Asians being discriminated against when it comes to entry into colleges (ex: Berkeley “we have enough Asians, we’d be all Asian), yes I do. And I’m *gasp* Anglo-Saxon white!

Actually, I wasn't asking anything remotely like that. But, "Asians are getting discriminated against so we should prohibit transgender pilots" is some amazing logic.

So is “we have enough Asians so even if they meet the criteria for entry, they will be denied because they are Asian

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The raw number and percentage of trans people is so small, it is hard to understand why the right is so fixated on them.

The number of natal women is very large.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DP. Now y'all are being silly.

ONLY certain female parts (a) produce eggs, (b) give birth, and (c) provide milk to newborns. ONLY a certain male part can produce stuff to fertilize an egg. A FEW men are physically larger and SOME men stronger, but I've also met women bodybuilders who are stronger than the majority of males out there and can kick their butt.

In the case of transgender, A FEW have physical capabilities of both male and female. In the case of gay or lesbian, it is more of a mental attraction / difference (versus a physical difference).

Short of that, the physiology, intellect, etc. of men, women, transexuals, gay, etc. don't differ that much and could be considered nearly identical.

If someone wants to deny the existence or reality of transgender, gay/lesbian, giving birth, etc., y'all aren't living in the real world. You need to grow up and learn how to deal with it.

The ignorance here is deep - showing why our educational system needs work

Males and females are dimorphic in humans and other mammal species in similar ways and for clear reasons

Human males are 10% bigger on average, females have 2/3 more body fat on average

There will never be a female as strong as the strongest male - the distributions are simply different

Medical conditions of various sorts manifest differently in males and females

On and on

The differences are way deeper than genitals

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Now y'all are being silly.

ONLY certain female parts (a) produce eggs, (b) give birth, and (c) provide milk to newborns. ONLY a certain male part can produce stuff to fertilize an egg. A FEW men are physically larger and SOME men stronger, but I've also met women bodybuilders who are stronger than the majority of males out there and can kick their butt.

In the case of transgender, A FEW have physical capabilities of both male and female. In the case of gay or lesbian, it is more of a mental attraction / difference (versus a physical difference).

Short of that, the physiology, intellect, etc. of men, women, transexuals, gay, etc. don't differ that much and could be considered nearly identical.

If someone wants to deny the existence or reality of transgender, gay/lesbian, giving birth, etc., y'all aren't living in the real world. You need to grow up and learn how to deal with it.

The ignorance here is deep - showing why our educational system needs work

Males and females are dimorphic in humans and other mammal species in similar ways and for clear reasons

Human males are 10% bigger on average, females have 2/3 more body fat on average

There will never be a female as strong as the strongest male - the distributions are simply different

Medical conditions of various sorts manifest differently in males and females

On and on

The differences are way deeper than genitals

Of course you are right, but what the ignorant PP you responded to wrote is the ascientific nonsense dogma that is peddled by people who defend the Lia Thomases of the world. They make up that nonsense to justify the explicitly anti-girl position they take with respect to sports.

[Anonymous]

I remember reading somewhere a quote to the effect of

"I'll believe women and men are the same as soon as someone discovers evidence of hunter-gatherer women forming raiding parties and attacking neighboring villages to capture husbands"

[Anonymous]

on a related note, if women can do anything men can do then how come they have never tried to subjugate an entire gender

[Anonymous]

They are the party of projection, so - undoubtedly - they'll say liberals were mean to them first! But, I think the underlying reasons are insecurity and fear along with a sense that aggression and exerting dominance are acceptable methods of getting one's way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:on a related note, if women can do anything men can do then how come they have never tried to subjugate an entire gender

Probably just my bubble, but most of the husbands I see are subservient to their wives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:on a related note, if women can do anything men can do then how come they have never tried to subjugate an entire gender

Probably just my bubble, but most of the husbands I see are subservient to their wives.

Hahaha true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The raw number and percentage of trans people is so small, it is hard to understand why the right is so fixated on them.

The number of natal women is very large.

Too bad mother nature kills off most of them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:on a related note, if women can do anything men can do then how come they have never tried to subjugate an entire gender

Probably just my bubble, but most of the husbands I see are subservient to their wives.

Definitely your bubble. Would you like to see stats about violence by males against women and girls vs violence by women against males?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:on a related note, if women can do anything men can do then how come they have never tried to subjugate an entire gender

Honestly the last few years have begun to convince me (the mother of a daughter) that we might want to start.