New Netflix documentary: "Live to Lead" from Harry and Meghan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When they were working royals the palace gave the sussexes a whole communications team. What did those people do? Why didn’t they respond to the press attacks?

That’s a good question. Perhaps Google could answer it for you. You might also look at Harry’s statement to the press prior to their marriage, law suits filed after their marriage, and comments about how they were advised to keep silent and carry on in the face of the noxious attacks.


Camilla’s son works for the Mail on Sunday. Camilla and Charles’s chief of communications used to be an executive at the Daily Mail. Gosh! It looks like the King and his wife are more aligned with the noxious tabloids than they are with the Sussexes. I wonder if these alignments have anything to do with what the palace controlled and funded communications team did and didn’t do? Ya think?

Lol if the palace had as much power over the media as they claim, the tampon story would never have seen the light of day and Camilla would not have been ground up in the tabloids for years. Darling boy, you cannot control the media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Royal Family does a LOT of complaining whenever Kate Middleton gets accused of Botox or displaying anything less than saintly behavior... https://www.insider.com/kate-middleton-legal-threat-tatler-profile-furious-increased-royal-duties-2020-9

But will not do or say anything to prevent their actual cronies in the press from saying the most vile things about Meghan.

Hmm. Interesting.

I see we have another person who doesn’t understand the meaning of the royal hierarchy. Yes, Kate is more important than Meghan.

[Anonymous]

These are two over privileged narcissists who are angry because they aren't being worshipped. To complain about your free house because it isn't befitting their station in life when so many are homeless and hurting, is unconscionable.

They are petulant, whining babies and I hope the King freezes them out of his coronation. They wanted freedom but they still want daddy to support them.

[Anonymous]

What happened to the thread about Harry and the identity of the older woman who deflowered him reportedly mentioned vaguely in his book “Spare”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When they were working royals the palace gave the sussexes a whole communications team. What did those people do? Why didn’t they respond to the press attacks?

Apparently this is a really small team and they shared it with William and Kate? I found that really surprising, not because Harry and Meghan are oh so special. Just seems like you're asking people to stretch themselves thin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These are two over privileged narcissists who are angry because they aren't being worshipped. To complain about your free house because it isn't befitting their station in life when so many are homeless and hurting, is unconscionable.

They are petulant, whining babies and I hope the King freezes them out of his coronation. They wanted freedom but they still want daddy to support them.

Have you watched their Netflix doc?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When they were working royals the palace gave the sussexes a whole communications team. What did those people do? Why didn’t they respond to the press attacks?

That’s a good question. Perhaps Google could answer it for you. You might also look at Harry’s statement to the press prior to their marriage, law suits filed after their marriage, and comments about how they were advised to keep silent and carry on in the face of the noxious attacks.


Camilla’s son works for the Mail on Sunday. Camilla and Charles’s chief of communications used to be an executive at the Daily Mail. Gosh! It looks like the King and his wife are more aligned with the noxious tabloids than they are with the Sussexes. I wonder if these alignments have anything to do with what the palace controlled and funded communications team did and didn’t do? Ya think?

Lol if the palace had as much power over the media as they claim, the tampon story would never have seen the light of day and Camilla would not have been ground up in the tabloids for years. Darling boy, you cannot control the media.

You probably are aware that the “tampon story” first got attention in the press several decades ago. While the institutions might be the same, most of the principals involved have changed. And, of course, “the media” and “the tabloids” aren’t quite functioning in lock step. It might be interesting to see what —if anything — has changed in recent years, including the mostly successful efforts to rehabilitate Camilla’s image, although that’s taken a serious hit these last few months.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When they were working royals the palace gave the sussexes a whole communications team. What did those people do? Why didn’t they respond to the press attacks?

That’s a good question. Perhaps Google could answer it for you. You might also look at Harry’s statement to the press prior to their marriage, law suits filed after their marriage, and comments about how they were advised to keep silent and carry on in the face of the noxious attacks.


Camilla’s son works for the Mail on Sunday. Camilla and Charles’s chief of communications used to be an executive at the Daily Mail. Gosh! It looks like the King and his wife are more aligned with the noxious tabloids than they are with the Sussexes. I wonder if these alignments have anything to do with what the palace controlled and funded communications team did and didn’t do? Ya think?

Lol if the palace had as much power over the media as they claim, the tampon story would never have seen the light of day and Camilla would not have been ground up in the tabloids for years. Darling boy, you cannot control the media.

You probably are aware that the “tampon story” first got attention in the press several decades ago. While the institutions might be the same, most of the principals involved have changed. And, of course, “the media” and “the tabloids” aren’t quite functioning in lock step. It might be interesting to see what —if anything — has changed in recent years, including the mostly successful efforts to rehabilitate Camilla’s image, although that’s taken a serious hit these last few months.

Charles was the Prince of Wales then. Direct heir to the throne.

The tabloids ARE the media.

[Anonymous]

Harry and Meghan are the only likeable people in that family as far as I can tell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry and Meghan are the only likeable people in that family as far as I can tell.

+1. By far. The rest have exhibited nothing but spineless passive aggression, juvenile pettiness and cattiness, and genuinely sinister, two-faced behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry and Meghan are the only likeable people in that family as far as I can tell.

That doesn’t say much. We all agree wth ourselves.

[Anonymous]

A lot of these people have shot videos for leave to lead in 2019 when Harry and Megan had nothing to do with the project. Several have come out recently upset that Harry and Megan are tied up with this project because they feel it reduces the credibility and the focus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What happened to the thread about Harry and the identity of the older woman who deflowered him reportedly mentioned vaguely in his book “Spare”?

Spare hasn’t been released yet. We don’t know for sure if he’s going to reveal her identity in the book or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royal Family does a LOT of complaining whenever Kate Middleton gets accused of Botox or displaying anything less than saintly behavior... https://www.insider.com/kate-middleton-legal-threat-tatler-profile-furious-increased-royal-duties-2020-9

But will not do or say anything to prevent their actual cronies in the press from saying the most vile things about Meghan.

Hmm. Interesting.

I see we have another person who doesn’t understand the meaning of the royal hierarchy. Yes, Kate is more important than Meghan.

DP

Wow unbelievable -
Not a matter of importance but of aiding and abetting cruelty …

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are two over privileged narcissists who are angry because they aren't being worshipped. To complain about your free house because it isn't befitting their station in life when so many are homeless and hurting, is unconscionable.

They are petulant, whining babies and I hope the King freezes them out of his coronation. They wanted freedom but they still want daddy to support them.

Have you watched their Netflix doc?

DP

Apparently not.

They presented a solid and credible case for themselves and not in a whiny way. Meghan had a full and rich life prior to meeting and marrying Harry. They had shared passions that brought them together. Meghan showed herself as interested in both humanitarian pursuits and being an entertainer from a young age. Her half sister has no cred as she relinquished her own children and did not see Meghan when she was growing up.

The royal family did not protect Harry and Meghan from tabloid feeding frenzies with heavily racist undertones.

I actually like Kate and William as well. I wish William and Harry’s families were not cast as being in competition but as brothers in collaboration to serve Britain and the Commonwealth. Many people draw comfort from the familiarity and cultural continuity of these living symbols of Britain’s Glory days and long history - for better and worse.

However, the royal family squandered a golden opportunity to make themselves more appealing to contemporary diverse Britons and Commonwealth Citizens. The royals have an intensely racist past connected to slavery and colonialism but they could have shown they have made progress by welcoming Meghan into the fold. Instead they did the opposite.

And why is a Charles rushing to take away Archie’s and Lilybet’s titles in petty rebuke? He and Camilla should be doing everything they can to restore good relations with Harry and Meghan .it would be a win win for the monarchy.