Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Their agenda was to save lives - the lives of children, teachers, and their families. The insistence of one political group on using that to further their own agenda is both hypocritical and based on complete denial of scientific evidence. No one in charge thought virtual school was a good idea. They just thought it was better than having all that death on their hands. They did their best. It's easy to criticize others when you yourself don't have any responsibility for the consequences, but all the time in the world to pretend you would have done something different or known something more. The fact that the virtual school was so poorly done is what people should be angry about. |
At the risk of getting this thread hijacked and shut down, it was so lucky for us that Youngkin was not governor and a democrat was. Blackface or no, it was only because NoVa's blue leanings that we were spared the massacre that took place in red states. |
Pretty sure this is sarcasm, because we all know there wasn't a massacre in red states. |
So poorly and for so long. The initial decision to close in March 2020 was understandable, but we knew much more by the fall. It is ridiculous that some leaders and the teachers’ unions were still pushing for closures in the fall of 2020. I think that's what most people are mad about- not the March decision. |
So your position is -- in-person is generally not great and so remote schooling wasn't much worse? |
Delusional. Amazingly so. |
I read it hurt those in grades 1, 2, and 3 most because they lost 1.5-2.0 years of instruction in four national subjects like math, reading, spelling and writing. Unfortunately upon return to full day, in person school in Fall 2021 there was lack of testing and lack of remedial work done given the students missing 50-80% of the instruction hours from March 2020- June 2021. Then for Fall 2021, many private and public schools and teachers were told to “go easy” in all the kids and focus mainly on “Socio emotional” things and still never circled back and fixed the math and reading deficits. Sad. |
| and yet people are still dying from covid and children are now dying of RSV. sigh. |
Nonsense. |
That is mainly because kids wore masks for so long. Their immune systems are weak do to lack of exposure. Sigh. |
This actually isn’t true. Sigh. |
Your immune system isn’t a muscle, it’s a photo album. Wearing a mask did not weaken anyone’s immune system. COVID infections did, though. |
Actually it is true. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/01/science/rsv-children-hospitals.html?unlocked_article_code=IVyZ0vKFjW6bbelpcl1w8SiE4Okq1ir_5gTQw3JWVGkKEI5x1v8yfxX0dOt8lsAX1pdBUNduWZ7CtfpoOTdt-nfTYFgcOYM_MrzKDgRu_etmWyhccXVHR06JO1cXq_AiptFmbutyMBvPZc718JAVs1C3J2RDmJ3FGzODLm7YWVrfbp3Ztsj8IdfHvGn1PT5QI4JJHjHmleXdfuv9VN7ewa72fIIHM74-O3qUzPq4e3xjIr1sJftorXeOf-P2rCyX7U3Y4hZTaRq0UwfWniHoPFWGGmKDssvrM5su6qgwOEWtfAa4duCfvNM4RflzI2DxM9HFwlhfYcqMD9Ua9r3JMw&smid=share-url
|
Correct. Their immune systems aren’t weak— they’re just naive, in the sense they lack a normal collection of neutralizing antibodies against common infections due to a collective lack of exposure. They’re all getting 2+ years worth of infections over a few month period. |
Your body retains the ability to recognize the viruses, but doesn’t retain the cells that fight those viruses. Those wane over a few months after infection. After that you'll be able to get reinfected, but generally the severity will be lessened. A big problem we have now with young kids is that there's an unusually large number of kids getting RSV for the *first* time, primarily due to pandemic related behaviors. That first infection is where there's highest risk. |