I agree. It sounds like this school acted to placate PP without regard to any of the potential complications that might arise from PP's well-meaning but ultimately self-serving lecture. If I were a parent whose kid were subjected to this "re-education" in lieu of actual lessons, I'd be quite irritated -- or, if a widow/widower whose child was in this classroom, I'd be downright livid. |
Plus one. PP’s misplaced vitriol against the adoptive mom who stood up for her child being bullied in the way school invited her to highlights the need for social support. |
This is a thread about the need for adoptive parents to have moral support. You are under#coring that point very well. |
Adoptive young child was being bullied for not looking like the rest of family. It caused a lot of sadness. School invited discussion to help the children understand adopted children are just as loved and wanted as biological children are. Bullying stopped. Parents and teachers gave positive feedback. The young kids did not understand how kids could look so different to their parents to and still be their real children. It was contextual and obvious I was referring to our own child and the kids asked questions related to multiracial adoptions. Since both the parents and teachers asked me to do quite a lot of sensitive community building work at the school, there seemed to be acknowledgement that I try hard to be sensitive to the feelings of others. I am sorry I offended you. |
This |
I would drop that MIL out of our lives so fast that her head would spin. That is a cruel and ugly thing to say! |