Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Yep looks like everyone hates them.

How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Achieving Princess Diana’s Unfulfilled Dream



https://www.gq.com/story/prince-harry-meghan-markle-princess-diana

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yep looks like everyone hates them.

How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Achieving Princess Diana’s Unfulfilled Dream



https://www.gq.com/story/prince-harry-meghan-markle-princess-diana

The British especially.

[Anonymous]

Do the British support their half in half out monetized royalty? Who would support that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep looks like everyone hates them.

How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Achieving Princess Diana’s Unfulfilled Dream



https://www.gq.com/story/prince-harry-meghan-markle-princess-diana

The British especially.

I’ll bet most of them think they are giving up the money. The general public isn’t smart. Look at Brexit and Boris Johnson (and Trump in the US.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep looks like everyone hates them.

How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Achieving Princess Diana’s Unfulfilled Dream



https://www.gq.com/story/prince-harry-meghan-markle-princess-diana

The British especially.

I’ll bet most of them think they are giving up the money. The general public isn’t smart. Look at Brexit and Boris Johnson (and Trump in the US.)

+1 they are just happy they don’t have to pay for them anymore.

[Anonymous]

This sounds like the domineering wife who drives a wedge between her husband and his family thus cutting off the man from his roots.

Was she not counseled on what to expect as a royal? Did she not know of her expected duties and what to expect in terms of responsibilities?
Is she just jealous because she is playing second fiddle to Kate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rumour has it Archie is with Jessica Mulroney. WTH is going on?

People Magazine reported it:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B7G8MH8JkGI/?hl=en


WTH? They clearly weren’t planning on staying in U.K. long.

This has mentioned by me twice already in this thread. People keep skipping over it. To me, it’s huge and says they aren’t discussing anything, merely informing.

I think Meghan and Harry expected the Queen and Prince Charles to roll over and cave to their demands (like they ALWAYS DO). The Firm has bent over backwards to give them everything they’ve asked for. Why should this latest plan be anything different? They underestimated the public backlash for disrespecting the Queen.

I think the Windsors have underestimated the public backlash against them IMO. This is the trending topic in Arabic, Spanish, French, and English globally with more than 80% of the pieces sympathetic to the Sussexes.

Honestly, I don't think they've 'bent over backwards'.

They gave them the same wedding they gave Eugenie. Which means it was standard far for a royal.

They gave them a tiny 4-bedroom house when all the Queen's children are living in massive 20-bedroom castles and Will+Kate have 12-bedrooms between their two homes.

They sent them on tours which is good - but that's also work and Meghan was expected to be the most photographed woman in the royal family without the benefit of a permanent hairdresser/makeup artist or personal dresser. Both of which Camilla and Kate have.

The basically gave the Sussexes what was required nothing more when Meghan/Harry are the stars and crowd-drawers of that family whether they like it or not.

Beyond that, they didn't utilize Meghan at all. She gives brilliant speeches, talks, and can host forums. She could have easily been sent to do UN Women talks with Sophie, had some appearances at refugee camps with WHO (as she's done in her past), and opened up diverse media conversations on network talks.

Instead they shamed her and asked her to be quiet.

Told you -

She (the Queen) ordered the Prince of Wales and Duke of Cambridge to find “immediate solutions” to the crisis as she fought for the survival of the monarchy at all costs.

Still reeling from the scandal over Prince Andrew’s friendship with paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, palace sources say the family is at a “huge crisis point in their recent history”.

Charles and William told their teams this afternoon to “drop everything” and arrange meetings with No10, the Home Office and their US and Canadian counterparts to come up with proposals for a solution in “days, not weeks”.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/queen-fights-save-monarchy-royal-21250128

All they had to do was stick up for the biracial royal and newest wife of the royal family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rumour has it Archie is with Jessica Mulroney. WTH is going on?

People Magazine reported it:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B7G8MH8JkGI/?hl=en


WTH? They clearly weren’t planning on staying in U.K. long.

This has mentioned by me twice already in this thread. People keep skipping over it. To me, it’s huge and says they aren’t discussing anything, merely informing.

I think Meghan and Harry expected the Queen and Prince Charles to roll over and cave to their demands (like they ALWAYS DO). The Firm has bent over backwards to give them everything they’ve asked for. Why should this latest plan be anything different? They underestimated the public backlash for disrespecting the Queen.

I think the Windsors have underestimated the public backlash against them IMO. This is the trending topic in Arabic, Spanish, French, and English globally with more than 80% of the pieces sympathetic to the Sussexes.

Honestly, I don't think they've 'bent over backwards'.

They gave them the same wedding they gave Eugenie. Which means it was standard far for a royal.

They gave them a tiny 4-bedroom house when all the Queen's children are living in massive 20-bedroom castles and Will+Kate have 12-bedrooms between their two homes.

They sent them on tours which is good - but that's also work and Meghan was expected to be the most photographed woman in the royal family without the benefit of a permanent hairdresser/makeup artist or personal dresser. Both of which Camilla and Kate have.

The basically gave the Sussexes what was required nothing more when Meghan/Harry are the stars and crowd-drawers of that family whether they like it or not.

Beyond that, they didn't utilize Meghan at all. She gives brilliant speeches, talks, and can host forums. She could have easily been sent to do UN Women talks with Sophie, had some appearances at refugee camps with WHO (as she's done in her past), and opened up diverse media conversations on network talks.

Instead they shamed her and asked her to be quiet.

Told you -

She (the Queen) ordered the Prince of Wales and Duke of Cambridge to find “immediate solutions” to the crisis as she fought for the survival of the monarchy at all costs.

Still reeling from the scandal over Prince Andrew’s friendship with paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, palace sources say the family is at a “huge crisis point in their recent history”.

Charles and William told their teams this afternoon to “drop everything” and arrange meetings with No10, the Home Office and their US and Canadian counterparts to come up with proposals for a solution in “days, not weeks”.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/queen-fights-save-monarchy-royal-21250128

All they had to do was stick up for the biracial royal and newest wife of the royal family.

The Mirror? Really?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep looks like everyone hates them.

How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Achieving Princess Diana’s Unfulfilled Dream



https://www.gq.com/story/prince-harry-meghan-markle-princess-diana

The British especially.

I daresay most are fine with the Sussexes going off to the sunset.

The question doesn't ask whether the government should continue to fund their lifestyle. That is the big issue. Based on the British press reaction, that's what people care about.

[Anonymous]

I want to know more about “hobbies”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rumour has it Archie is with Jessica Mulroney. WTH is going on?

People Magazine reported it:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B7G8MH8JkGI/?hl=en


WTH? They clearly weren’t planning on staying in U.K. long.

This has mentioned by me twice already in this thread. People keep skipping over it. To me, it’s huge and says they aren’t discussing anything, merely informing.

I think Meghan and Harry expected the Queen and Prince Charles to roll over and cave to their demands (like they ALWAYS DO). The Firm has bent over backwards to give them everything they’ve asked for. Why should this latest plan be anything different? They underestimated the public backlash for disrespecting the Queen.

I think the Windsors have underestimated the public backlash against them IMO. This is the trending topic in Arabic, Spanish, French, and English globally with more than 80% of the pieces sympathetic to the Sussexes.

Honestly, I don't think they've 'bent over backwards'.

They gave them the same wedding they gave Eugenie. Which means it was standard far for a royal.

They gave them a tiny 4-bedroom house when all the Queen's children are living in massive 20-bedroom castles and Will+Kate have 12-bedrooms between their two homes.

They sent them on tours which is good - but that's also work and Meghan was expected to be the most photographed woman in the royal family without the benefit of a permanent hairdresser/makeup artist or personal dresser. Both of which Camilla and Kate have.

The basically gave the Sussexes what was required nothing more when Meghan/Harry are the stars and crowd-drawers of that family whether they like it or not.

Beyond that, they didn't utilize Meghan at all. She gives brilliant speeches, talks, and can host forums. She could have easily been sent to do UN Women talks with Sophie, had some appearances at refugee camps with WHO (as she's done in her past), and opened up diverse media conversations on network talks.

Instead they shamed her and asked her to be quiet.

Told you -

She (the Queen) ordered the Prince of Wales and Duke of Cambridge to find “immediate solutions” to the crisis as she fought for the survival of the monarchy at all costs.

Still reeling from the scandal over Prince Andrew’s friendship with paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, palace sources say the family is at a “huge crisis point in their recent history”.

Charles and William told their teams this afternoon to “drop everything” and arrange meetings with No10, the Home Office and their US and Canadian counterparts to come up with proposals for a solution in “days, not weeks”.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/queen-fights-save-monarchy-royal-21250128

All they had to do was stick up for the biracial royal and newest wife of the royal family.

The Mirror? Really?

That is a question I'd ask the entire Royal family. Why is the Royal Rota (their version of the White House Press Corps) composed of 7 news media - 4 of which are tabloids. The Mirror happens to be one of those.

If its good enough for the Queen, I guess its good enough for the common folk.

[Anonymous]

I'm reading the Queen is refusing to meet with Harry. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a30457938/prince-harry-meeting-queen-blocked-courtiers/

So she will do a public ride with Prince Andrew the day after that interview where he claims he couldn't have raped a girl because he ate pizza and doesn't sweat cuz he's a war hero. But won't meet with Harry?

H&M seem to have made the right call. That family is nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep looks like everyone hates them.

How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Achieving Princess Diana’s Unfulfilled Dream



https://www.gq.com/story/prince-harry-meghan-markle-princess-diana

The British especially.

Agreed the response would be very different if the question were:
"Do you support (blah blah blah) while still receiving taxpayer money (or retaining royal titles)"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm reading the Queen is refusing to meet with Harry. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a30457938/prince-harry-meeting-queen-blocked-courtiers/

So she will do a public ride with Prince Andrew the day after that interview where he claims he couldn't have raped a girl because he ate pizza and doesn't sweat cuz he's a war hero. But won't meet with Harry?

H&M seem to have made the right call. That family is nuts.

That's one way to look at it.

When H&M walk away, then they will have made the right call. They haven't done that. Yet.

[Anonymous]

As an American, I would like them stop using off their titles. Not because they don't deserve them but because they are too good for them. The BRF is the very embodiment of inequality and racism.