new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

This argument is a waste of time. Kavanaugh is on the SC and he's not going anywhere. History is already strongly slanting toward judging his accusers to have been liars. People that don't like Trump/Republicans will find fault with his demeanor/debt/anything else when the sexual assault accusations start to fall apart. People that support him will call it a witch hunt. Nothing will be resolved here and arguing is an exercise in futility and frustration.

Democrats, win in 2020 and hope RBG lives long enough to have not already been replaced by then. Democrats aren't getting 67 seats in the Senate and they aren't packing the court. Kavanaugh will be on the court for the next 30 years. The 2016 election had consequences.

Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey-Ford are no substitutes for winning elections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more you liberals keep up with your defamation of Kavanaugh - who did NOTHING wrong, the more we are reminded that another seat may open in the coming years.
The more you give us another reason to be sure to get out and vote.
So, keep it up.

We have already seen that GOP thinks pussy grabbing, sexual assault of minors, sexual assault of adults and also election fraud and treason are nothing.
Of course you think Kavanaugh did nothing.

Because you have actual evidence of him doing something wrong - correct? Oh, wait...

This just makes you sound ignorant.

Says the person with zero evidence to back up her allegations. Ignorant, indeed.

You have no idea what constitutes evidence. I can't wait for Kavanaugh to be impeached. Like the rest of the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more you liberals keep up with your defamation of Kavanaugh - who did NOTHING wrong, the more we are reminded that another seat may open in the coming years.
The more you give us another reason to be sure to get out and vote.
So, keep it up.

We have already seen that GOP thinks pussy grabbing, sexual assault of minors, sexual assault of adults and also election fraud and treason are nothing.
Of course you think Kavanaugh did nothing.

Because you have actual evidence of him doing something wrong - correct? Oh, wait...

This just makes you sound ignorant.

Says the person with zero evidence to back up her allegations. Ignorant, indeed.

You have no idea what constitutes evidence. I can't wait for Kavanaugh to be impeached. Like the rest of the US.

I’m so sorry that you’re going to be disappointed. Maybe take up a hobby to fill those lonely hours while you wait?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just curious: How many people are still arguing with each other on this thread?

I was just posting to get to page “69.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You Kav groupies are really dug in. This will not end well for him.

You don’t have to be a “groupie” to defend someone who has been vilified with zero evidence. I can only hope you’re accused of something, decades after the allegations supposedly occurred. I wonder how you would possibly defend yourself against something that simply can’t be proven, or even substantiated. It’s innocent until proven guilty in this country, sweetie.

WHO PAID HIS SIX FIGURE DEBT?

It's funny how none of you are concerned that he won't answer that?

He most definitely SHOULD have to answer for this, as concerns could arise and speculation made regarding corruption, bribery, pay-offs, etc.

I'm not saying that's what's occurring, however if he refuses to produce an explanation of just how such a high debt was paid, he then doesn't get to take offense when speculation of such starts to come to light.

HIS PARENTS.

Nope. That would have been in the financial disclosures. It wasn’t.

So who owns Bretty?

The Illuminati, of course.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This argument is a waste of time. Kavanaugh is on the SC and he's not going anywhere. History is already strongly slanting toward judging his accusers to have been liars. People that don't like Trump/Republicans will find fault with his demeanor/debt/anything else when the sexual assault accusations start to fall apart. People that support him will call it a witch hunt. Nothing will be resolved here and arguing is an exercise in futility and frustration.

Democrats, win in 2020 and hope RBG lives long enough to have not already been replaced by then. Democrats aren't getting 67 seats in the Senate and they aren't packing the court. Kavanaugh will be on the court for the next 30 years. The 2016 election had consequences.

Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey-Ford are no substitutes for winning elections.

Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth. The White House spiked the investigation. You support an attempted rapist, a perjurer and a weak, financially compromised political hack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This argument is a waste of time. Kavanaugh is on the SC and he's not going anywhere. History is already strongly slanting toward judging his accusers to have been liars. People that don't like Trump/Republicans will find fault with his demeanor/debt/anything else when the sexual assault accusations start to fall apart. People that support him will call it a witch hunt. Nothing will be resolved here and arguing is an exercise in futility and frustration.

Democrats, win in 2020 and hope RBG lives long enough to have not already been replaced by then. Democrats aren't getting 67 seats in the Senate and they aren't packing the court. Kavanaugh will be on the court for the next 30 years. The 2016 election had consequences.

Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey-Ford are no substitutes for winning elections.

Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth. The White House spiked the investigation. You support an attempted rapist, a perjurer and a weak, financially compromised political hack.

And, let's just remember that her best friend at the time doesn't even believe her. Nor does her own father.
But, continue with your fantasies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This argument is a waste of time. Kavanaugh is on the SC and he's not going anywhere. History is already strongly slanting toward judging his accusers to have been liars. People that don't like Trump/Republicans will find fault with his demeanor/debt/anything else when the sexual assault accusations start to fall apart. People that support him will call it a witch hunt. Nothing will be resolved here and arguing is an exercise in futility and frustration.

Democrats, win in 2020 and hope RBG lives long enough to have not already been replaced by then. Democrats aren't getting 67 seats in the Senate and they aren't packing the court. Kavanaugh will be on the court for the next 30 years. The 2016 election had consequences.

Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey-Ford are no substitutes for winning elections.

Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth. The White House spiked the investigation. You support an attempted rapist, a perjurer and a weak, financially compromised political hack.

I still do not understand why she did not call the police immediately after the attack while Kavanaugh may still have been at the party and there may have been witnesses who at least heard the assault. Seems irresponsible on her part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This argument is a waste of time. Kavanaugh is on the SC and he's not going anywhere. History is already strongly slanting toward judging his accusers to have been liars. People that don't like Trump/Republicans will find fault with his demeanor/debt/anything else when the sexual assault accusations start to fall apart. People that support him will call it a witch hunt. Nothing will be resolved here and arguing is an exercise in futility and frustration.

Democrats, win in 2020 and hope RBG lives long enough to have not already been replaced by then. Democrats aren't getting 67 seats in the Senate and they aren't packing the court. Kavanaugh will be on the court for the next 30 years. The 2016 election had consequences.

Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey-Ford are no substitutes for winning elections.

Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth. The White House spiked the investigation. You support an attempted rapist, a perjurer and a weak, financially compromised political hack.

I still do not understand why she did not call the police immediately after the attack while Kavanaugh may still have been at the party and there may have been witnesses who at least heard the assault. Seems irresponsible on her part.

You can read up on the subject. It was discussed ad nauseum when Blasey Ford came forward. There’s a degree of shock, disbelief, not wanting to believe that that just happened to you, and the fear you won’t be believed.

Turns out that that last fear of hers was very much grounded in reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This argument is a waste of time. Kavanaugh is on the SC and he's not going anywhere. History is already strongly slanting toward judging his accusers to have been liars. People that don't like Trump/Republicans will find fault with his demeanor/debt/anything else when the sexual assault accusations start to fall apart. People that support him will call it a witch hunt. Nothing will be resolved here and arguing is an exercise in futility and frustration.

Democrats, win in 2020 and hope RBG lives long enough to have not already been replaced by then. Democrats aren't getting 67 seats in the Senate and they aren't packing the court. Kavanaugh will be on the court for the next 30 years. The 2016 election had consequences.

Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey-Ford are no substitutes for winning elections.

Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth. The White House spiked the investigation. You support an attempted rapist, a perjurer and a weak, financially compromised political hack.

I still do not understand why she did not call the police immediately after the attack while Kavanaugh may still have been at the party and there may have been witnesses who at least heard the assault. Seems irresponsible on her part.

You can read up on the subject. It was discussed ad nauseum when Blasey Ford came forward. There’s a degree of shock, disbelief, not wanting to believe that that just happened to you, and the fear you won’t be believed.

Turns out that that last fear of hers was very much grounded in reality.

Since you are trafficking in suppositions, let me give you some better reasons: She was afraid of getting into trouble with her parents for being at a party, drinking beer, and putting herself into a compromising position with boys who had been drinking beer. The MoCo police would have taken her to the local precinct, called her parents, and then interviewed her about the sexual assault. It would have been an embarrassment to her and her parents with whom she already had a strained relationship. She made the calculus that nothing really happened so it was best not to bring it up. She did the original coverup and would only shed light on it when her opinions about abortion felt threatened. Yeh, there's a reason she is a psychologist. Most people who enter that profession have their own mental issues to address.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more you liberals keep up with your defamation of Kavanaugh - who did NOTHING wrong, the more we are reminded that another seat may open in the coming years.
The more you give us another reason to be sure to get out and vote.
So, keep it up.

We have already seen that GOP thinks pussy grabbing, sexual assault of minors, sexual assault of adults and also election fraud and treason are nothing.
Of course you think Kavanaugh did nothing.

Because you have actual evidence of him doing something wrong - correct? Oh, wait...

This just makes you sound ignorant.

Says the person with zero evidence to back up her allegations. Ignorant, indeed.

You have no idea what constitutes evidence. I can't wait for Kavanaugh to be impeached. Like the rest of the US.

Nor do you, or anyone who actually thinks a 30+ year old high school yearbook is in any way “evidence”. What a bunch of morons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This argument is a waste of time. Kavanaugh is on the SC and he's not going anywhere. History is already strongly slanting toward judging his accusers to have been liars. People that don't like Trump/Republicans will find fault with his demeanor/debt/anything else when the sexual assault accusations start to fall apart. People that support him will call it a witch hunt. Nothing will be resolved here and arguing is an exercise in futility and frustration.

Democrats, win in 2020 and hope RBG lives long enough to have not already been replaced by then. Democrats aren't getting 67 seats in the Senate and they aren't packing the court. Kavanaugh will be on the court for the next 30 years. The 2016 election had consequences.

Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey-Ford are no substitutes for winning elections.

Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth. The White House spiked the investigation. You support an attempted rapist, a perjurer and a weak, financially compromised political hack.

My goodness, seek help. These delusions of yours only seem to be getting worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This argument is a waste of time. Kavanaugh is on the SC and he's not going anywhere. History is already strongly slanting toward judging his accusers to have been liars. People that don't like Trump/Republicans will find fault with his demeanor/debt/anything else when the sexual assault accusations start to fall apart. People that support him will call it a witch hunt. Nothing will be resolved here and arguing is an exercise in futility and frustration.

Democrats, win in 2020 and hope RBG lives long enough to have not already been replaced by then. Democrats aren't getting 67 seats in the Senate and they aren't packing the court. Kavanaugh will be on the court for the next 30 years. The 2016 election had consequences.

Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey-Ford are no substitutes for winning elections.

Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth. The White House spiked the investigation. You support an attempted rapist, a perjurer and a weak, financially compromised political hack.

And, let's just remember that her best friend at the time doesn't even believe her. Nor does her own father.
But, continue with your fantasies.

+1
Fantasies and wishful thinking seem to be all they’re going on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This argument is a waste of time. Kavanaugh is on the SC and he's not going anywhere. History is already strongly slanting toward judging his accusers to have been liars. People that don't like Trump/Republicans will find fault with his demeanor/debt/anything else when the sexual assault accusations start to fall apart. People that support him will call it a witch hunt. Nothing will be resolved here and arguing is an exercise in futility and frustration.

Democrats, win in 2020 and hope RBG lives long enough to have not already been replaced by then. Democrats aren't getting 67 seats in the Senate and they aren't packing the court. Kavanaugh will be on the court for the next 30 years. The 2016 election had consequences.

Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey-Ford are no substitutes for winning elections.

Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth. The White House spiked the investigation. You support an attempted rapist, a perjurer and a weak, financially compromised political hack.

I still do not understand why she did not call the police immediately after the attack while Kavanaugh may still have been at the party and there may have been witnesses who at least heard the assault. Seems irresponsible on her part.

You are joking right? I went to school in bethesda in the 80s. Most women didn't report rape back then and certainly not date rape, because date rape wasn't acknowledged to be a crime. Any girl who'd gone to report what Blasey described would not have been taken seriously. It was a regular and accepted part of behavior then. There might have been whispers about a boy being aggressive and abusive and to stay away from him, but prosecution? No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This argument is a waste of time. Kavanaugh is on the SC and he's not going anywhere. History is already strongly slanting toward judging his accusers to have been liars. People that don't like Trump/Republicans will find fault with his demeanor/debt/anything else when the sexual assault accusations start to fall apart. People that support him will call it a witch hunt. Nothing will be resolved here and arguing is an exercise in futility and frustration.

Democrats, win in 2020 and hope RBG lives long enough to have not already been replaced by then. Democrats aren't getting 67 seats in the Senate and they aren't packing the court. Kavanaugh will be on the court for the next 30 years. The 2016 election had consequences.

Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey-Ford are no substitutes for winning elections.

Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth. The White House spiked the investigation. You support an attempted rapist, a perjurer and a weak, financially compromised political hack.

I still do not understand why she did not call the police immediately after the attack while Kavanaugh may still have been at the party and there may have been witnesses who at least heard the assault. Seems irresponsible on her part.

I lived in Chevy Chade at the same time but was mostly in Stone Ridge/Gonzaga circles. If any one had attacked me the way Blasey said she was attacked, I certainly would have told my parents and my father would have had the police involved immediately. I think you sound like a Blasey type who had a bad relationship with her parents.
You are joking right? I went to school in bethesda in the 80s. Most women didn't report rape back then and certainly not date rape, because date rape wasn't acknowledged to be a crime. Any girl who'd gone to report what Blasey described would not have been taken seriously. It was a regular and accepted part of behavior then. There might have been whispers about a boy being aggressive and abusive and to stay away from him, but prosecution? No.