Hayfield Football Coach Fired

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where's the proof it happened at those other schools you are trying to deag down into the mud with Hayfield.

Show us the many players who were on another roster last year who played for a school you are pointing a finger at this year.

Yes every school in fcps and Virginia except hayfield and ocean lakes fo everything completely above board and never do any questionable things

You can’t be that delusional about how things work anywhere to actually believe that

We can’t name them all because there’s too many. The difference is that they aren’t as publicly blatant about it as Overton and hayfield people were.

Does every single school do it in every sport no pretty unlikely but it’s not hard to do even the most basic research and realize oh yea that did happen

Again, if you honestly believe this doesn’t happen at other schools in other sports, then I don’t know what to tell you.

So you have no proof.

What do you want proof of

Someone says it happens at other places

Other people confirm it does happen

I’m not talking 30+ players, maybe 1-4 players, when these things happen it’s just done very quietly

There was a ton of proof that Hayfield brought in all these transfers. Social media, rosters compared to previous rosters etc.

You are alleging other schools cheat. So, there should be proof. Where is it?

There was a ton of lies and racist rhetoric about Hayfield.

That doesn't answer pp's question. There was a ton of easily verifiable information between rosters and social media on Hayfiels's transfers. So all these other schools you say are cheating should have the same. But you can't produce a shred of evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was 4 private school transfers plus 1 from
a DCPS HS. Likely more.

Ok yea they came from a private school but are u not mentioning that they actually live in the Hayfield school district but chose to private on their own accord, now let’s be real if they chose to come back that’s their business as well but, def reaching a tryna generalize to make an issue that ain’t. That mans name as far as football goes is that of one of the best in the state and best around here, it’s not hard to figure out why they transferred back as it was blasted all over the news and newspapers that he had left Freedom to come to Hayfield, so again let’s use some common sense here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please, tell us which other schools had 33+ transfers this year?

doesn’t matter how many transfers they had or what year they came. If a team had players that transferred in last year just to play football, they are just as much in violation of the rule.

can you name a single other school where that happened?

Soco
Fairfax
Westfields
Robinson

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reposting prior post as it explains what is specifically not allowed. Families can and do move in and out of communities all the time. Rule 27-9-2 is what is not allowed. By way of another example at a different school, found to violate this rule years ago because, among other things, was letting 8th grades dress in school uniforms and be on field during games, etc.

Anonymous wrote:As an interested third party in the Hayfield situation, I don’t think VHSL would be approaching this as “transfer violations”. As we are told by Hayfield insiders, the students have all been cleared. However, I believe the rule that seems like is broken is VHSL 27-9-1 for PROSELYTIZING, and specifically rule 27-9-2 #4 below. I have pasted the entire section if you don’t want to look it up yourselves. This would also be why there would be not forfeiture of games as there are no issues with the individuals, but that Hayfield has broken the letter and spirit of this rule and subject to disciplinary action as deemed appropriate.

27-9-1 PROSELYTIZING RULE-No member school or group of individuals representing the school shall subject a student from another school to undue influence by encouraging him/her to transfer from one school to another for League activities.

27-9-2 Interpretation: The appropriate District Committee shall decide what constitutes undue influence on the basis of the evidence presented in each case. Undue influence has generally been interpreted to mean an act by any person or group connected with the school or not connected with a school to persuade a student to enroll in a school outside the areas in which he/she resides or persuade his/her parents or guardian to move to the areas of another school. Some specific examples of undue influence are:
(1) Being asked to move by a member of the school faculty.
(2) Being asked to move by a booster organization or a member of such an organization.
(3) Being given tuition, free text books, allowance for transportation or consideration not afforded other students, athletic or nonathletic.
(4) Any other evidence that a transfer or enrollment was made because of athletic ability.

27-9-3 Penalty: Any school adjudged guilty of bringing such undue influence to bear upon a student through any individual connected with the school, either directly or indirectly, shall be subject to such disciplinary action as the appropriate District Committee or interDistrict Committee may impose.

In my opinion, this Hayfield season is the epitome of why this PROSELYTIZING rule exists, and again, in my opinion represents one of the major goals of the VHSL, which is 'fair play' between all high schools in Virginia. All high schools are not recruiting, and while some may do it on occasion with a kid or two every year, that is very hard to prove whether why one or two kids have transferred. When a high school, in the first year of a head coach coming to the school, gets ~20 kids from his former (state champion) high school, in addition to 2-3 other transfers from outside the county (private and public), with the majority transferring within a couple months of Hayfield announcing the new coach. If it looks, walks, and talks like a duck - it usually is (i.e if it looks, walks, and talk like recruiting, it usually is), and I am assuming VHSL has further evidence of this and why they are recommending the multi-year ban.

Well the problem is that the rule hasn’t been enforced. If you have coaches with teams ranked just as high as Hayfield doing this and those schools aren’t being penalized, it looks like Hayfield is being targeted.

Who else is doing this? Again, if you know and have specifics to your claim, it sounds like VHSL is listening. This might be the time to nail everybody. But so far all anyone gives as proof are a couple of names from decades past.

I mean everybody speeds. Not everyone gets caught. But most people would agree that when you’re going 95mph in a 45moh zone, you alhave broken the rules and should be disciplined!

Madison is guilty, Battlefield is guilty, Patriot is guilty, Stone Bridge is guilty, South County is even guilty of this.

If you know specifics, then go and report. You have to be able to prove it. Hayfield has admitted to it, so VHSL could pick it up. These other schools have not admitted it.

Admitted to what, if they admitted to something why is there an appeal. Make it make sense, if you can

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please, tell us which other schools had 33+ transfers this year?

doesn’t matter how many transfers they had or what year they came. If a team had players that transferred in last year just to play football, they are just as much in violation of the rule.

can you name a single other school where that happened?

Soco
Fairfax
Westfields
Robinson

Where's the proof? Show us where they played this year, and last year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was 4 private school transfers plus 1 from
a DCPS HS. Likely more.

Ok yea they came from a private school but are u not mentioning that they actually live in the Hayfield school district but chose to private on their own accord, now let’s be real if they chose to come back that’s their business as well but, def reaching a tryna generalize to make an issue that ain’t. That mans name as far as football goes is that of one of the best in the state and best around here, it’s not hard to figure out why they transferred back as it was blasted all over the news and newspapers that he had left Freedom to come to Hayfield, so again let’s use some common sense here

All 4 private school transfers just happened to already live on Hayfield zone last spring?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reposting prior post as it explains what is specifically not allowed. Families can and do move in and out of communities all the time. Rule 27-9-2 is what is not allowed. By way of another example at a different school, found to violate this rule years ago because, among other things, was letting 8th grades dress in school uniforms and be on field during games, etc.

Anonymous wrote:As an interested third party in the Hayfield situation, I don’t think VHSL would be approaching this as “transfer violations”. As we are told by Hayfield insiders, the students have all been cleared. However, I believe the rule that seems like is broken is VHSL 27-9-1 for PROSELYTIZING, and specifically rule 27-9-2 #4 below. I have pasted the entire section if you don’t want to look it up yourselves. This would also be why there would be not forfeiture of games as there are no issues with the individuals, but that Hayfield has broken the letter and spirit of this rule and subject to disciplinary action as deemed appropriate.

27-9-1 PROSELYTIZING RULE-No member school or group of individuals representing the school shall subject a student from another school to undue influence by encouraging him/her to transfer from one school to another for League activities.

27-9-2 Interpretation: The appropriate District Committee shall decide what constitutes undue influence on the basis of the evidence presented in each case. Undue influence has generally been interpreted to mean an act by any person or group connected with the school or not connected with a school to persuade a student to enroll in a school outside the areas in which he/she resides or persuade his/her parents or guardian to move to the areas of another school. Some specific examples of undue influence are:
(1) Being asked to move by a member of the school faculty.
(2) Being asked to move by a booster organization or a member of such an organization.
(3) Being given tuition, free text books, allowance for transportation or consideration not afforded other students, athletic or nonathletic.
(4) Any other evidence that a transfer or enrollment was made because of athletic ability.

27-9-3 Penalty: Any school adjudged guilty of bringing such undue influence to bear upon a student through any individual connected with the school, either directly or indirectly, shall be subject to such disciplinary action as the appropriate District Committee or interDistrict Committee may impose.

In my opinion, this Hayfield season is the epitome of why this PROSELYTIZING rule exists, and again, in my opinion represents one of the major goals of the VHSL, which is 'fair play' between all high schools in Virginia. All high schools are not recruiting, and while some may do it on occasion with a kid or two every year, that is very hard to prove whether why one or two kids have transferred. When a high school, in the first year of a head coach coming to the school, gets ~20 kids from his former (state champion) high school, in addition to 2-3 other transfers from outside the county (private and public), with the majority transferring within a couple months of Hayfield announcing the new coach. If it looks, walks, and talks like a duck - it usually is (i.e if it looks, walks, and talk like recruiting, it usually is), and I am assuming VHSL has further evidence of this and why they are recommending the multi-year ban.

Well the problem is that the rule hasn’t been enforced. If you have coaches with teams ranked just as high as Hayfield doing this and those schools aren’t being penalized, it looks like Hayfield is being targeted.

Who else is doing this? Again, if you know and have specifics to your claim, it sounds like VHSL is listening. This might be the time to nail everybody. But so far all anyone gives as proof are a couple of names from decades past.

I mean everybody speeds. Not everyone gets caught. But most people would agree that when you’re going 95mph in a 45moh zone, you alhave broken the rules and should be disciplined!

Madison is guilty, Battlefield is guilty, Patriot is guilty, Stone Bridge is guilty, South County is even guilty of this.

If you know specifics, then go and report. You have to be able to prove it. Hayfield has admitted to it, so VHSL could pick it up. These other schools have not admitted it.

Admitted to what, if they admitted to something why is there an appeal. Make it make sense, if you can

You can transfer to another school all you want and follow all the eligibility rules. However, per the recruiting/proselytizing you cannot transfer only for athletic reasons. The families have admitted that they left their schools to play for Overton, not for any academic reason.

Why are they appealing? I’m assuming because they can and want to try to convince VHSL they didn’t do anything wrong. You know people always appeal when they get the option, right? Even when they know they are guilty,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reposting prior post as it explains what is specifically not allowed. Families can and do move in and out of communities all the time. Rule 27-9-2 is what is not allowed. By way of another example at a different school, found to violate this rule years ago because, among other things, was letting 8th grades dress in school uniforms and be on field during games, etc.

Anonymous wrote:As an interested third party in the Hayfield situation, I don’t think VHSL would be approaching this as “transfer violations”. As we are told by Hayfield insiders, the students have all been cleared. However, I believe the rule that seems like is broken is VHSL 27-9-1 for PROSELYTIZING, and specifically rule 27-9-2 #4 below. I have pasted the entire section if you don’t want to look it up yourselves. This would also be why there would be not forfeiture of games as there are no issues with the individuals, but that Hayfield has broken the letter and spirit of this rule and subject to disciplinary action as deemed appropriate.

27-9-1 PROSELYTIZING RULE-No member school or group of individuals representing the school shall subject a student from another school to undue influence by encouraging him/her to transfer from one school to another for League activities.

27-9-2 Interpretation: The appropriate District Committee shall decide what constitutes undue influence on the basis of the evidence presented in each case. Undue influence has generally been interpreted to mean an act by any person or group connected with the school or not connected with a school to persuade a student to enroll in a school outside the areas in which he/she resides or persuade his/her parents or guardian to move to the areas of another school. Some specific examples of undue influence are:
(1) Being asked to move by a member of the school faculty.
(2) Being asked to move by a booster organization or a member of such an organization.
(3) Being given tuition, free text books, allowance for transportation or consideration not afforded other students, athletic or nonathletic.
(4) Any other evidence that a transfer or enrollment was made because of athletic ability.

27-9-3 Penalty: Any school adjudged guilty of bringing such undue influence to bear upon a student through any individual connected with the school, either directly or indirectly, shall be subject to such disciplinary action as the appropriate District Committee or interDistrict Committee may impose.

In my opinion, this Hayfield season is the epitome of why this PROSELYTIZING rule exists, and again, in my opinion represents one of the major goals of the VHSL, which is 'fair play' between all high schools in Virginia. All high schools are not recruiting, and while some may do it on occasion with a kid or two every year, that is very hard to prove whether why one or two kids have transferred. When a high school, in the first year of a head coach coming to the school, gets ~20 kids from his former (state champion) high school, in addition to 2-3 other transfers from outside the county (private and public), with the majority transferring within a couple months of Hayfield announcing the new coach. If it looks, walks, and talks like a duck - it usually is (i.e if it looks, walks, and talk like recruiting, it usually is), and I am assuming VHSL has further evidence of this and why they are recommending the multi-year ban.

Well the problem is that the rule hasn’t been enforced. If you have coaches with teams ranked just as high as Hayfield doing this and those schools aren’t being penalized, it looks like Hayfield is being targeted.

Who else is doing this? Again, if you know and have specifics to your claim, it sounds like VHSL is listening. This might be the time to nail everybody. But so far all anyone gives as proof are a couple of names from decades past.

I mean everybody speeds. Not everyone gets caught. But most people would agree that when you’re going 95mph in a 45moh zone, you alhave broken the rules and should be disciplined!

Madison is guilty, Battlefield is guilty, Patriot is guilty, Stone Bridge is guilty, South County is even guilty of this.

If you know specifics, then go and report. You have to be able to prove it. Hayfield has admitted to it, so VHSL could pick it up. These other schools have not admitted it.

Admitted to what, if they admitted to something why is there an appeal. Make it make sense, if you can

You can transfer to another school all you want and follow all the eligibility rules. However, per the recruiting/proselytizing you cannot transfer only for athletic reasons. The families have admitted that they left their schools to play for Overton, not for any academic reason.

Why are they appealing? I’m assuming because they can and want to try to convince VHSL they didn’t do anything wrong. You know people always appeal when they get the option, right? Even when they know they are guilty,

Obviously the football program was a factor, but FCPS has been one of the best school districts in the country for longer than 40 years. The families could also say academics played a part in them bringing their boys to FCPS, in addition to football.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reposting prior post as it explains what is specifically not allowed. Families can and do move in and out of communities all the time. Rule 27-9-2 is what is not allowed. By way of another example at a different school, found to violate this rule years ago because, among other things, was letting 8th grades dress in school uniforms and be on field during games, etc.

Anonymous wrote:As an interested third party in the Hayfield situation, I don’t think VHSL would be approaching this as “transfer violations”. As we are told by Hayfield insiders, the students have all been cleared. However, I believe the rule that seems like is broken is VHSL 27-9-1 for PROSELYTIZING, and specifically rule 27-9-2 #4 below. I have pasted the entire section if you don’t want to look it up yourselves. This would also be why there would be not forfeiture of games as there are no issues with the individuals, but that Hayfield has broken the letter and spirit of this rule and subject to disciplinary action as deemed appropriate.

27-9-1 PROSELYTIZING RULE-No member school or group of individuals representing the school shall subject a student from another school to undue influence by encouraging him/her to transfer from one school to another for League activities.

27-9-2 Interpretation: The appropriate District Committee shall decide what constitutes undue influence on the basis of the evidence presented in each case. Undue influence has generally been interpreted to mean an act by any person or group connected with the school or not connected with a school to persuade a student to enroll in a school outside the areas in which he/she resides or persuade his/her parents or guardian to move to the areas of another school. Some specific examples of undue influence are:
(1) Being asked to move by a member of the school faculty.
(2) Being asked to move by a booster organization or a member of such an organization.
(3) Being given tuition, free text books, allowance for transportation or consideration not afforded other students, athletic or nonathletic.
(4) Any other evidence that a transfer or enrollment was made because of athletic ability.

27-9-3 Penalty: Any school adjudged guilty of bringing such undue influence to bear upon a student through any individual connected with the school, either directly or indirectly, shall be subject to such disciplinary action as the appropriate District Committee or interDistrict Committee may impose.

In my opinion, this Hayfield season is the epitome of why this PROSELYTIZING rule exists, and again, in my opinion represents one of the major goals of the VHSL, which is 'fair play' between all high schools in Virginia. All high schools are not recruiting, and while some may do it on occasion with a kid or two every year, that is very hard to prove whether why one or two kids have transferred. When a high school, in the first year of a head coach coming to the school, gets ~20 kids from his former (state champion) high school, in addition to 2-3 other transfers from outside the county (private and public), with the majority transferring within a couple months of Hayfield announcing the new coach. If it looks, walks, and talks like a duck - it usually is (i.e if it looks, walks, and talk like recruiting, it usually is), and I am assuming VHSL has further evidence of this and why they are recommending the multi-year ban.

Well the problem is that the rule hasn’t been enforced. If you have coaches with teams ranked just as high as Hayfield doing this and those schools aren’t being penalized, it looks like Hayfield is being targeted.

Who else is doing this? Again, if you know and have specifics to your claim, it sounds like VHSL is listening. This might be the time to nail everybody. But so far all anyone gives as proof are a couple of names from decades past.

I mean everybody speeds. Not everyone gets caught. But most people would agree that when you’re going 95mph in a 45moh zone, you alhave broken the rules and should be disciplined!

Madison is guilty, Battlefield is guilty, Patriot is guilty, Stone Bridge is guilty, South County is even guilty of this.

If you know specifics, then go and report. You have to be able to prove it. Hayfield has admitted to it, so VHSL could pick it up. These other schools have not admitted it.

Admitted to what, if they admitted to something why is there an appeal. Make it make sense, if you can

You can transfer to another school all you want and follow all the eligibility rules. However, per the recruiting/proselytizing you cannot transfer only for athletic reasons. The families have admitted that they left their schools to play for Overton, not for any academic reason.

Why are they appealing? I’m assuming because they can and want to try to convince VHSL they didn’t do anything wrong. You know people always appeal when they get the option, right? Even when they know they are guilty,

Obviously the football program was a factor, but FCPS has been one of the best school districts in the country for longer than 40 years. The families could also say academics played a part in them bringing their boys to FCPS, in addition to football.

Yeah, maybe. Not sure if 20+ kids without coordination decided to move to FCPS within a couple of months of the coach transferring to the school for academic reasons. But they could have said that from the get go, but they didn’t. They said it was because of the coach.

Unfortunately for them, it might be too late to find out now. I guess we’ll find out today what the result of all this talk is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was 4 private school transfers plus 1 from
a DCPS HS. Likely more.

Ok yea they came from a private school but are u not mentioning that they actually live in the Hayfield school district but chose to private on their own accord, now let’s be real if they chose to come back that’s their business as well but, def reaching a tryna generalize to make an issue that ain’t. That mans name as far as football goes is that of one of the best in the state and best around here, it’s not hard to figure out why they transferred back as it was blasted all over the news and newspapers that he had left Freedom to come to Hayfield, so again let’s use some common sense here

All 4 private school transfers just happened to already live on Hayfield zone last spring?

Yeah this seems highly unlikely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was 4 private school transfers plus 1 from
a DCPS HS. Likely more.

Ok yea they came from a private school but are u not mentioning that they actually live in the Hayfield school district but chose to private on their own accord, now let’s be real if they chose to come back that’s their business as well but, def reaching a tryna generalize to make an issue that ain’t. That mans name as far as football goes is that of one of the best in the state and best around here, it’s not hard to figure out why they transferred back as it was blasted all over the news and newspapers that he had left Freedom to come to Hayfield, so again let’s use some common sense here

All 4 private school transfers just happened to already live on Hayfield zone last spring?

Yeah this seems highly unlikely.

Give the 4 as clean reasons, still leaves double digit problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reposting prior post as it explains what is specifically not allowed. Families can and do move in and out of communities all the time. Rule 27-9-2 is what is not allowed. By way of another example at a different school, found to violate this rule years ago because, among other things, was letting 8th grades dress in school uniforms and be on field during games, etc.

Anonymous wrote:As an interested third party in the Hayfield situation, I don’t think VHSL would be approaching this as “transfer violations”. As we are told by Hayfield insiders, the students have all been cleared. However, I believe the rule that seems like is broken is VHSL 27-9-1 for PROSELYTIZING, and specifically rule 27-9-2 #4 below. I have pasted the entire section if you don’t want to look it up yourselves. This would also be why there would be not forfeiture of games as there are no issues with the individuals, but that Hayfield has broken the letter and spirit of this rule and subject to disciplinary action as deemed appropriate.

27-9-1 PROSELYTIZING RULE-No member school or group of individuals representing the school shall subject a student from another school to undue influence by encouraging him/her to transfer from one school to another for League activities.

27-9-2 Interpretation: The appropriate District Committee shall decide what constitutes undue influence on the basis of the evidence presented in each case. Undue influence has generally been interpreted to mean an act by any person or group connected with the school or not connected with a school to persuade a student to enroll in a school outside the areas in which he/she resides or persuade his/her parents or guardian to move to the areas of another school. Some specific examples of undue influence are:
(1) Being asked to move by a member of the school faculty.
(2) Being asked to move by a booster organization or a member of such an organization.
(3) Being given tuition, free text books, allowance for transportation or consideration not afforded other students, athletic or nonathletic.
(4) Any other evidence that a transfer or enrollment was made because of athletic ability.

27-9-3 Penalty: Any school adjudged guilty of bringing such undue influence to bear upon a student through any individual connected with the school, either directly or indirectly, shall be subject to such disciplinary action as the appropriate District Committee or interDistrict Committee may impose.

In my opinion, this Hayfield season is the epitome of why this PROSELYTIZING rule exists, and again, in my opinion represents one of the major goals of the VHSL, which is 'fair play' between all high schools in Virginia. All high schools are not recruiting, and while some may do it on occasion with a kid or two every year, that is very hard to prove whether why one or two kids have transferred. When a high school, in the first year of a head coach coming to the school, gets ~20 kids from his former (state champion) high school, in addition to 2-3 other transfers from outside the county (private and public), with the majority transferring within a couple months of Hayfield announcing the new coach. If it looks, walks, and talks like a duck - it usually is (i.e if it looks, walks, and talk like recruiting, it usually is), and I am assuming VHSL has further evidence of this and why they are recommending the multi-year ban.

Well the problem is that the rule hasn’t been enforced. If you have coaches with teams ranked just as high as Hayfield doing this and those schools aren’t being penalized, it looks like Hayfield is being targeted.

Who else is doing this? Again, if you know and have specifics to your claim, it sounds like VHSL is listening. This might be the time to nail everybody. But so far all anyone gives as proof are a couple of names from decades past.

I mean everybody speeds. Not everyone gets caught. But most people would agree that when you’re going 95mph in a 45moh zone, you alhave broken the rules and should be disciplined!

Madison is guilty, Battlefield is guilty, Patriot is guilty, Stone Bridge is guilty, South County is even guilty of this.

If you know specifics, then go and report. You have to be able to prove it. Hayfield has admitted to it, so VHSL could pick it up. These other schools have not admitted it.

Admitted to what, if they admitted to something why is there an appeal. Make it make sense, if you can

You can transfer to another school all you want and follow all the eligibility rules. However, per the recruiting/proselytizing you cannot transfer only for athletic reasons. The families have admitted that they left their schools to play for Overton, not for any academic reason.

Why are they appealing? I’m assuming because they can and want to try to convince VHSL they didn’t do anything wrong. You know people always appeal when they get the option, right? Even when they know they are guilty,

Obviously the football program was a factor, but FCPS has been one of the best school districts in the country for longer than 40 years. The families could also say academics played a part in them bringing their boys to FCPS, in addition to football.

Yeah, maybe. Not sure if 20+ kids without coordination decided to move to FCPS within a couple of months of the coach transferring to the school for academic reasons. But they could have said that from the get go, but they didn’t. They said it was because of the coach.

Unfortunately for them, it might be too late to find out now. I guess we’ll find out today what the result of all this talk is.

Guess they will affirm the ruling when they get done celebrating yesterday’s big win.

[Anonymous]

Not sure what poltics has to do with cheating in HS sports.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This particular individual has shown such poor judgment in her social media posts that I can't believe anyone approves of her giving morality advice to minors. Serious yikes.

This. So much poor judgement. Does she also work in the school? I'd love to know what jobs these hangers-on are doing in school system.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was 4 private school transfers plus 1 from
a DCPS HS. Likely more.

Ok yea they came from a private school but are u not mentioning that they actually live in the Hayfield school district but chose to private on their own accord, now let’s be real if they chose to come back that’s their business as well but, def reaching a tryna generalize to make an issue that ain’t. That mans name as far as football goes is that of one of the best in the state and best around here, it’s not hard to figure out why they transferred back as it was blasted all over the news and newspapers that he had left Freedom to come to Hayfield, so again let’s use some common sense here

No fool. The common sense is it's against the rules to recruit as he has done.

I hate high school sports because of the rabid adults who do crap like this.