This! |
+1. That’s falling for a trap if you make it so that he gets them whenever he feels like it. He can easily make up stories that you put up barriers (“she wants to go to a sleepover!”). My ex also spent the first 4 months never having kid sleep over and then all of a sudden got a bug up his *ss about how I was keeping kid from him. I very quickly documented (in an email) all the efforts I had made and told him that he must start taking “his” days. |
I would make sure you have documentation of those requests. If you made them verbally, then I'd make them at least one more time in writing. And then just make sure you're sticking to those times, until he asks for more. If you need to cancel (kid is sick, kid has a very important commitment) then offer replacement time in writing, but otherwise, I think the ball is in his court to ask. |
The agreement is the agreement though. OP doesn’t just get to cancel dad’s time because the kid is sick or has a “commitment.” That’s why the whole “offer him flexibility” or “work with him” thing is a trap. He will be more than happy to take them or not depending on his own convenience but the second mom says “Larla has a cold and wants to stay here” or “Larla has a sleepover” - he will start to cry “parental alienation.” |
This, but I would reach out every 2 weeks or monthly and offer a schedule so he if he says you are withholding the kids or not working with him, you have a text or email showing you reached out and he didn't respond. Send the same email each time. Hello, I am working on the children's schedules for the next month. Please let me know which days/nights you plan to take the kids so I can plan accordingly. Attached is the calendar of their activities and things planned so far. Thank you! |
OP can do what ever she wants but if you are still in the court stage its best to be proactive AND have it documented in writing. |
What is wrong with you?? No. It is not OP’s responsibility to step in wherever XH falls short. Ever heard of weaponized incompetence? It sucks, but OP can make clear to the kids that when they are with Dad, it is his responsibility to take care of their needs. Now, if there are a few items that the kids can bring from Mom’s to Dad’s in order to feel more at home, that makes sense. But not OP’s job to go in and snowplow everything. Also: 1. A lot of dads ask for split or shared custody in order to reduce or avoid paying child support, not because they truly want to parent. 2. Men in general seem to have different ideas compared to women about what items are necessary for a house to be a home. “Decorating” is not required. Getting by with basics and choosing not to go to Pottery Barn and getting all the trendy stuff is not a failure. I would hope that the Dad will do some things to make the house more welcoming for the kids, but if he doesn’t, he will reap what he sows. |
+100 OPs ex seems to fit this |
A lot of moms also refuse shared custody as they want to maximize child support for their expenses. It goes both ways. No, she doesn’t have to but sometimes it’s about the kids, not you or him and it’s not helping him, it’s he,ping the kids by decorating their room. Pottery barn is easy. They can just as easily do ikea, Walmart, target, bobs, etc. |
We don’t know as no one here has seen him parent or talked to him. It’s just the normal anti men moms who want to cut the dads out for more money and grumble the dads do nothing when they aren’t allowed. |
No, women want more custody because they know their loser deadbeat husbands are not properly equipped to parent a child 50% of the time. |
Huh? How dim are you? It's been over a month and he hasn't told them what room is theirs. He hasn't had them sleep over because he's failed to set up his home for them. No one is saying he "isn't allowed" to do his duty as a parent. Get over yourself. This is not OPs fault. This is not womens' fault. This is not other moms' fault. This is HIS fault. This is HIS failure as a parent. Calling that out isn't anti-men. You sound delusional trying to defend this man. |
| I swear there is a recent thread about this, but from the STBXs POV. It started with him asking about whether to rent a furnished home or furnish it himself, and disintegrated from there. |
Ha! No. DP but I ended up with 100% because their dad travels for work and didn’t want to set up another household. I received the state mandated amount. It was far from a profitable enterprise. It is why XH just bought a sports car in cash while I am pretty much paycheck to paycheck even though we make about the same money. |
Oh but it would be totally helping and enabling him. There is ZERO reason STBX cannot or should not do any of those things. |