Seriously, why aren’t women more afraid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Texas lets women die of sepsis due to the dead babies they are not allowed to have removed.

So, Texas is cool with killing women to prevent them from having dead people removed from their uterus.

Yeah, I am worried.

Why do I care if Texas decides not to accept a bunch of forms of ID and makes it harder to vote?

I posted on the other thread that stupid people should be allowed to vote. I don’t believe in disenfranchisement. I’m never going to say this is worthwhile, even if it garners more Dem votes. Dems are better than MAGA/GOP. Our policies are popular. We don’t need to screw people over to win.

If we could avoid being duped into nominating 80 year old clowns and instead nominate the Obama/Clinton types, we'd never lose to the pathetic Trump era GOP.

Interesting. Trump ran against a 60yo. But we have fascism because you and others didn’t like the sound of her laugh. But, I know you insist we didn’t nominate her, we only voted for her for VP. I’ll be waiting for more pretzel logic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Texas lets women die of sepsis due to the dead babies they are not allowed to have removed.

So, Texas is cool with killing women to prevent them from having dead people removed from their uterus.

Yeah, I am worried.

Why do I care if Texas decides not to accept a bunch of forms of ID and makes it harder to vote?

I posted on the other thread that stupid people should be allowed to vote. I don’t believe in disenfranchisement. I’m never going to say this is worthwhile, even if it garners more Dem votes. Dems are better than MAGA/GOP. Our policies are popular. We don’t need to screw people over to win.

But if Texans want these policies, who are we to deny them that right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Texas lets women die of sepsis due to the dead babies they are not allowed to have removed.

So, Texas is cool with killing women to prevent them from having dead people removed from their uterus.

Yeah, I am worried.

Why do I care if Texas decides not to accept a bunch of forms of ID and makes it harder to vote?

I posted on the other thread that stupid people should be allowed to vote. I don’t believe in disenfranchisement. I’m never going to say this is worthwhile, even if it garners more Dem votes. Dems are better than MAGA/GOP. Our policies are popular. We don’t need to screw people over to win.

But if Texans want these policies, who are we to deny them that right?

Because as of today we are the United States of America. We have rights guaranteed as part of that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a female Trump voter. I’m not afraid at all. I don’t understand your point. I don’t see what rights he is taking away from us. Your claim about not being able to drive is preposterous, especially when states issue drivers licenses.

Serious people stopped reading when you said you are a female trumpet.

You asked why women are not speaking up. You asked why Republican women are not speaking up and I answered you. We don’t see him as a threat to our rights.

Hiw can you not see??? Have you bothered to read Project 2025 and do you realize they are following this like a playbook? What about when you can’t vote because you have a married name don’t have a passport?

This hysteria and breathlessness “I’m literally shaking” is why no one takes democrats seriously anymore.

PP, are you are waiting for the big moment when the tanks roll into the city to wake up? This is not a movie.

We have seen a consistent eroding of our rights. WAKE UP, for goodness sake. Men, women, children, the red line has been crossed!!!

Tanks? Again, this is why democrats aren’t taken seriously.

And some of us actually lived here when — wait for it — tanks rolled into the city. Troll better. Or at least do some actual research first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Texas lets women die of sepsis due to the dead babies they are not allowed to have removed.

So, Texas is cool with killing women to prevent them from having dead people removed from their uterus.

Yeah, I am worried.

Why do I care if Texas decides not to accept a bunch of forms of ID and makes it harder to vote?

I posted on the other thread that stupid people should be allowed to vote. I don’t believe in disenfranchisement. I’m never going to say this is worthwhile, even if it garners more Dem votes. Dems are better than MAGA/GOP. Our policies are popular. We don’t need to screw people over to win.

If we could avoid being duped into nominating 80 year old clowns and instead nominate the Obama/Clinton types, we'd never lose to the pathetic Trump era GOP.

Interesting. Trump ran against a 60yo. But we have fascism because you and others didn’t like the sound of her laugh. But, I know you insist we didn’t nominate her, we only voted for her for VP. I’ll be waiting for more pretzel logic.

Think a little harder. That 60 yr old was a last minute replacement nominee of a very unpopular elderly incumbent who had his campaign for a second term collapse on him just a few months prior to Election Day. The incumbent party loses 100 times out of 100 in this situation; even against an opponent as weak as Trump. You can try all you want to point fingers at Harris but the 2024 campaign debacle was 100% the fault of Biden and the idiots that supported his nomination in 2020.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I actually think it would be a good use of money (for some private org / charity) to help folks apply for and pay for passports. I know the fee is nothing to posters on here but $130 could be a barrier to entry for some.

That’s a great idea! And people need to do this quickly. I imagine that getting passports and the supporting documents needed to obtain them might become a more arduous process soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump and MAGA are heading us into an era of full on women oppression. Why aren’t all women - both Dem and Rep - speaking up? Do women refuse to believe that this is happening? Soon we won’t be permitted to drive or have our own bank account. Why are we just watching this happen??

you clearly are not following Dem women on social media. Can't saw what GOP is up to. Think they like it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Texas lets women die of sepsis due to the dead babies they are not allowed to have removed.

So, Texas is cool with killing women to prevent them from having dead people removed from their uterus.

Yeah, I am worried.

Why do I care if Texas decides not to accept a bunch of forms of ID and makes it harder to vote?

I posted on the other thread that stupid people should be allowed to vote. I don’t believe in disenfranchisement. I’m never going to say this is worthwhile, even if it garners more Dem votes. Dems are better than MAGA/GOP. Our policies are popular. We don’t need to screw people over to win.

If we could avoid being duped into nominating 80 year old clowns and instead nominate the Obama/Clinton types, we'd never lose to the pathetic Trump era GOP.

Interesting. Trump ran against a 60yo. But we have fascism because you and others didn’t like the sound of her laugh. But, I know you insist we didn’t nominate her, we only voted for her for VP. I’ll be waiting for more pretzel logic.

Think a little harder. That 60 yr old was a last minute replacement nominee of a very unpopular elderly incumbent who had his campaign for a second term collapse on him just a few months prior to Election Day. The incumbent party loses 100 times out of 100 in this situation; even against an opponent as weak as Trump. You can try all you want to point fingers at Harris but the 2024 campaign debacle was 100% the fault of Biden and the idiots that supported his nomination in 2020.

Nope he was the right choice in 2020. Hr should have announced he wasn’t seeking another term 18 months before the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Texas lets women die of sepsis due to the dead babies they are not allowed to have removed.

So, Texas is cool with killing women to prevent them from having dead people removed from their uterus.

Yeah, I am worried.

Why do I care if Texas decides not to accept a bunch of forms of ID and makes it harder to vote?

I posted on the other thread that stupid people should be allowed to vote. I don’t believe in disenfranchisement. I’m never going to say this is worthwhile, even if it garners more Dem votes. Dems are better than MAGA/GOP. Our policies are popular. We don’t need to screw people over to win.

If we could avoid being duped into nominating 80 year old clowns and instead nominate the Obama/Clinton types, we'd never lose to the pathetic Trump era GOP.

Interesting. Trump ran against a 60yo. But we have fascism because you and others didn’t like the sound of her laugh. But, I know you insist we didn’t nominate her, we only voted for her for VP. I’ll be waiting for more pretzel logic.

Think a little harder. That 60 yr old was a last minute replacement nominee of a very unpopular elderly incumbent who had his campaign for a second term collapse on him just a few months prior to Election Day. The incumbent party loses 100 times out of 100 in this situation; even against an opponent as weak as Trump. You can try all you want to point fingers at Harris but the 2024 campaign debacle was 100% the fault of Biden and the idiots that supported his nomination in 2020.

Nope he was the right choice in 2020. Hr should have announced he wasn’t seeking another term 18 months before the election.

MAGA idiots think he was the right choice in 2020. Anyone with half a brain knew the elderly unlikable jerk would just hand power back over to Trump in 2024.

[Anonymous]

Maybe they've realized that dedicating their 20's and 30's to soul sucking careers wasn't all they thought it would be. Many are old enough to see the game they were born into but not young enough to adapt to it. Millennials are coming of age and they aren't happy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Texas lets women die of sepsis due to the dead babies they are not allowed to have removed.

So, Texas is cool with killing women to prevent them from having dead people removed from their uterus.

Yeah, I am worried.

Why do I care if Texas decides not to accept a bunch of forms of ID and makes it harder to vote?

I posted on the other thread that stupid people should be allowed to vote. I don’t believe in disenfranchisement. I’m never going to say this is worthwhile, even if it garners more Dem votes. Dems are better than MAGA/GOP. Our policies are popular. We don’t need to screw people over to win.

If we could avoid being duped into nominating 80 year old clowns and instead nominate the Obama/Clinton types, we'd never lose to the pathetic Trump era GOP.

Interesting. Trump ran against a 60yo. But we have fascism because you and others didn’t like the sound of her laugh. But, I know you insist we didn’t nominate her, we only voted for her for VP. I’ll be waiting for more pretzel logic.

Think a little harder. That 60 yr old was a last minute replacement nominee of a very unpopular elderly incumbent who had his campaign for a second term collapse on him just a few months prior to Election Day. The incumbent party loses 100 times out of 100 in this situation; even against an opponent as weak as Trump. You can try all you want to point fingers at Harris but the 2024 campaign debacle was 100% the fault of Biden and the idiots that supported his nomination in 2020.

Nope he was the right choice in 2020. Hr should have announced he wasn’t seeking another term 18 months before the election.

He was the "right" choice in 2020 as one of the few people on the planet that could fumble and bumble his way to creating an easy path for Trump to win a second term in 2024???? Do you realize how stupid you sound? You're either a MAGA troll or a complete idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they've realized that dedicating their 20's and 30's to soul sucking careers wasn't all they thought it would be. Many are old enough to see the game they were born into but not young enough to adapt to it. Millennials are coming of age and they aren't happy.

Soul sucking? Not quite. I dedicated my 20s and 30s to my career and have no regrets at all. It was (and is) all I thought it would be. You don’t speak for all women. Trump and the GOP are destroying our country. You could even say they are sucking the country’s soul. I’m definitely afraid of them. My career is not a source of fear or soul sucking.

And this awful SAVE Act will affect any US born citizen who changed their name, regardless of whether they have career or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a female Trump voter. I’m not afraid at all. I don’t understand your point. I don’t see what rights he is taking away from us. Your claim about not being able to drive is preposterous, especially when states issue drivers licenses.

Unless your birth certificate matches your ID, you will not be able to vote. Did you take your husbands last name when you got married?

That’s just not true. If you can prove citizenship, you can vote. Birth certificate plus marriage certificate, Real ID, passport. Lots of options.

And you don't think this burden on women is straight up misogynist BS?

+1 Men don't have to jump through these hoops to exercise their right to vote.

They do if they changed their name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a female Trump voter. I’m not afraid at all. I don’t understand your point. I don’t see what rights he is taking away from us. Your claim about not being able to drive is preposterous, especially when states issue drivers licenses.

Serious people stopped reading when you said you are a female trumpet.

You asked why women are not speaking up. You asked why Republican women are not speaking up and I answered you. We don’t see him as a threat to our rights.

Hiw can you not see??? Have you bothered to read Project 2025 and do you realize they are following this like a playbook? What about when you can’t vote because you have a married name don’t have a passport?

Just read/watch Handmaid’s Tale from the start. You will see the path we are on. Women like Serena Joy are helping the MAGA cause. Nut jobs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a female Trump voter. I’m not afraid at all. I don’t understand your point. I don’t see what rights he is taking away from us. Your claim about not being able to drive is preposterous, especially when states issue drivers licenses.

Unless your birth certificate matches your ID, you will not be able to vote. Did you take your husbands last name when you got married?

That’s just not true. If you can prove citizenship, you can vote. Birth certificate plus marriage certificate, Real ID, passport. Lots of options.

Real ID only provides proof of citizenship in 5 states. The other 45 states do not use a "citizenship verifying" form of real ID. This isn't the saving grace so many women seem to think it is.