Barnard is Barnard, not Columbia!!!

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:But Barnard is Columbia.


Barnard didn't want to be a part of Columbia, that's why Columbia became co-ed in the 80's.

So Barnard changes their mind now.


Not quite. OP is miffed about one student, allegedly a friend of her kid who had the audacity to state Barnard-Columbia '26 in their Instagram bio. Imagine the horror🤦‍♀️


Well, I would roll my eyes at that too. So dumb.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:But Barnard is Columbia.


No dog in this fight but the Barnard folks seem to have the facts on their side. The Columbia boosters just don't like it. I sure hope the Columbia people have some tie to Columbia. Otherwise, this may be the most pathetic thread ever.


You are making zero sense. Columbia "boosters"? Where? And you "hope the Columbia people have some tie to Columbia"? That literally makes no sense. Like, re-read that sentence. In any case, why would that make this thread pathetic?

And no, the facts are not on Barnard's side. Columbia literally says that it has three undergraduate divisions right on its website, and does not list Barnard as one. They are separate institutions with separate acceptance and admissions criteria, as well as separate graduation requirements and criteria, so it is 100% dishonest to claim that you were "accepted" to or "graduated" from Columbia if you are a Barnard student.
Anonymous
New Yorkers respect Barnard. New Yorkers think EXTREMELY poorly of any Barnard girl that tries to pretend they went to Columbia.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is a bit of a back door situation, isn’t it? They should just purchase another campus and sever formal ties to the university. After all, Barnardians proudly proclaim that they wanted to attend Barnard, not Columbia!

And yea, everyone finds the intentional obfuscation of the Barnard name on the part of Barnard students/grads shady. Just say Barnard.


Omg, yes, this. Well said.


Who exactly do you think this is misleading? The people who really know what Columbia is are going to know what Barnard is. So if you get into a conversation, they're going to be able to tease the Barnard out rather quickly, and you're going to embarrass yourself. And the other...99.99% of the population simply could not care less either way. Even the real Columbia does not ooze prestige to laymen.


https://wjla.com/news/local/i-was-hyperventilating-dc-student-receives-full-ride-scholarship-columbia-university-temitayo-adeola

Washington, D.C. (7News) — Twitter users are cheering on a dc high-school senior as he prepares for a big step in his journey. Temitayo Adeola, a senior at Eastern High School in Washington, D.C., was granted a full ride scholarship to the ivy league school of his dreams.

It was a dream come true for Temi who just learned of his full-ride scholarship to the prestigious Columbia University.

https://www.inquirer.com/news/daca-immigrants-columbia-university-thompson-church-sanctuary-philadelphia-trump-20200731.html

At age 22, DACA recipient Clive Thompson Jr. has accomplished something extraordinary: admission to the elite Columbia University in New York City.

https://abc7chicago.com/columbia-university-scholarship-chicago-schools-public/5763644/

CHICAGO (WLS) -- At Chicago Bulls College Prep, Jaylen Starr is known as a legend in the halls and in the classroom. The high school senior got into his top school, Columbia University, on a full ride. His road to the Ivy League was an uphill battle.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/river-forest/ct-rfl-trinity-seniors-scholarships-tl-0425-story.html

Sanchez was selected for early admission and a full scholarship to Columbia University in New York with help from a more than $200,000 four-year scholarship through QuestBridge National College Match, the school noted. Out of 16,248 applicants, Sanchez was one of 1,044 recipients of the award.

Maybe not to you, but I guess it oozes prestige to the local DC, Philly, and Chicago newspaper/television stations.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Kinda like optometrists who call themselves doctors?


Doctor of Optometry degree. Not all “doctors “ are physicians.


Law schools confer doctoral degrees and graduates wear doctoral robes. But no lawyer I’ve ever met wants to be called “doctor.” Doctor used to mean someone with a Ph.D. Someone who had extended human knowledge. The idea that someone should be called doctor simply for having been trained in a professional skill is abhorrent. And yes, I include physicians. Medical schools did not start conferring doctoral degrees on their graduates until one did in the 19th century and then they all followed suit.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:New Yorkers respect Barnard. New Yorkers think EXTREMELY poorly of any Barnard girl that tries to pretend they went to Columbia.


Do they feel the same way about SGS students who say they went to Columbia? After reading about how Columbia fudges their numbers to USNWR, I wouldn’t be thinking too highly of the entire school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s the same issue you run into with Harvard Extension School. The name confers expectations around selectivity and academic achievement— “vetting,” to put it shortly. The admission standards are different and more lenient. If you say you went to Columbia when you actually went to Barnard, you’re being duplicitous.


The Columbia booster is trying this line again? Harvard Extension School students have a degree in “extension studies,” not a BA.

In contrast, Barnard undergrads have a BA from Columbia, just like the School of General Studies undergrads. If you have a problem with it, take it up with Columbia.



You are crazy if you think Harvard extension students are not Harvard legit students. It's extremely rigorous work bc courses are identical to the actual Harvard classes taught by the same Harvard professors. It's laughable when people put Harvard down when regular Harvard students are just as good - and on par - as extension students.


https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2021/10/7/extension-school-scrut/


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ss2N7Gv0MdY



Harvard extension is not the same as Harvard. Or if it is then Harvard is not all it’s cracked up to be. The extension classes are pretty easy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I went to Barnard! Love it! Great school! I didn't call it Columbia, nor did I want to go to CU. But why do you care?


My guess is that this ruffles feathers because these students/parents are implying they got into Columbia, which is significantly harder than getting into Barnard. If they had applied to Columbia college or engineering they wouldn't have gotten in. They got into Barnard because it has, undeniably, lower standards, so I imagine it bothers the other Ivy parents to hear them brag about getting in.

Regardless, who cares who is brags about this kind of stuff? It is stupid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Actually the diploma says Columbia University, Barnard College. Barnard is part of Columbia.


Congratulations!
You made it at the 2nd best college in the USA!
I really question Columbia University's ranking as 2nd best college in the USA.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:But Barnard is Columbia.


No dog in this fight but the Barnard folks seem to have the facts on their side. The Columbia boosters just don't like it. I sure hope the Columbia people have some tie to Columbia. Otherwise, this may be the most pathetic thread ever.


You are making zero sense. Columbia "boosters"? Where? And you "hope the Columbia people have some tie to Columbia"? That literally makes no sense. Like, re-read that sentence. In any case, why would that make this thread pathetic?

And no, the facts are not on Barnard's side. Columbia literally says that it has three undergraduate divisions right on its website, and does not list Barnard as one. They are separate institutions with separate acceptance and admissions criteria, as well as separate graduation requirements and criteria, so it is 100% dishonest to claim that you were "accepted" to or "graduated" from Columbia if you are a Barnard student.


It’s more complicated than you’re making out to be. Barnard and Columbia have a unique partnership. They share virtually all facilities. Barnard women play with Columbia women in athletic teams. Barnard students can register for a wide range of Columbia courses. They can even pursue Crain majors at Columbia.

But the bottom line is this:

The diploma that a Barnard College graduate receives is signed by BOTH the president of Barnard AND the the provost of Columbia University, indicating that the degree is awarded jointly by both institutions.

The Barnard administration advises its students to tell those ho ask that they are “graduates of Barnard College of Columbia University.”

The partnership between these 2 institutions is unique so no one can try to fit it into a box that is like other universities. It doesn’t work. Regardless, the fact is that Barnard falls under the umbrella of Columbia University but the partnership has allowed them to remain independent in certain ways so that it can maintain its identity as a women’s college and set priorities for its students in a way that revignizes their needs and aspirations as women.

https://barnard.edu/boldly-barnard/columbia-university
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I went to Barnard! Love it! Great school! I didn't call it Columbia, nor did I want to go to CU. But why do you care?


My guess is that this ruffles feathers because these students/parents are implying they got into Columbia, which is significantly harder than getting into Barnard. If they had applied to Columbia college or engineering they wouldn't have gotten in. They got into Barnard because it has, undeniably, lower standards, so I imagine it bothers the other Ivy parents to hear them brag about getting in.

Regardless, who cares who is brags about this kind of stuff? It is stupid.


Harder to get into Columbia than Barnard? I imagine that it’s harder to get into Columbia College of Engineering than it is to get into Columbia College. I imagine that various majors within each of these colleges have varying degrees of difficulty as well. I expect that there are differences in access between male and female applicants to different majors as well as the university strives to achieve gender balance. Same for URMs, legacies, athletes, etc. Geographic differences as well. Whole different story for SGS as well. Does Columbia even calculate those applicants into their stated rate of acceptance?

The fact that there is no one single standard of selection at Columbia. It varies depending on a lot of factors. Another fact is that Barnard only admitted 11% of it applicants last year. It is incredibly selective. It’s standard for admission is more similar to Columbia than it is difference. For the vast majority of college applicants both are an incredible reach. And it is much easier for men to get into Columbia than to get into Barnard.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:New Yorkers respect Barnard. New Yorkers think EXTREMELY poorly of any Barnard girl that tries to pretend they went to Columbia.


Do they feel the same way about SGS students who say they went to Columbia? After reading about how Columbia fudges their numbers to USNWR, I wouldn’t be thinking too highly of the entire school.


No, SGS is, unfortunately, part of the Columbia Corporation. Barnard is not. Barnard is a separate corporation. Barnard has its own President, its own Board of Trustees and its own endowment.

Columbia College, The Fu School of Engineering, and Columbia School of General Studies all have the same President, Board of Trustees and endowment.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:New Yorkers respect Barnard. New Yorkers think EXTREMELY poorly of any Barnard girl that tries to pretend they went to Columbia.


Do they feel the same way about SGS students who say they went to Columbia? After reading about how Columbia fudges their numbers to USNWR, I wouldn’t be thinking too highly of the entire school.


No, SGS is, unfortunately, part of the Columbia Corporation. Barnard is not. Barnard is a separate corporation. Barnard has its own President, its own Board of Trustees and its own endowment.

Columbia College, The Fu School of Engineering, and Columbia School of General Studies all have the same President, Board of Trustees and endowment.


You’re trying to make this into an either/or question and it isn’t. It’s a partnership. It’s unique. They’re affiliated. Barnard’s own website says that it’s under the Columbia umbrella. (See the link which I provided.) You can try to make it into something else, but it isn’t.

Teacher’s College was founded as a separate institution from Columbia University, but it later became affiliated with Columbia muc the way that Barnard is now affiliated. Columbua includes if us affiliated with 17 schools and programs. Schools with which it is affiliated include Barnard College, Jewish Theological
Seminary, Teacher’s College, and Union Theological Seminary. See link:

https://www.tc.columbia.edu/student-affairs/about-us/tc-understanding-the-affiliation/

A lot of this is hair splitting because it makes little to no difference in the lives of the students who attend college there. Whether it’s an affiliation and a partnership or whether it were one big university with separate schools and college, it functions in the same way for the students who attend and go to class every day. The differences are more technical than they are real in the lives of students. In the end, Barnard students get a degree endorsed by both Barnard itself and by Columbia University.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:New Yorkers respect Barnard. New Yorkers think EXTREMELY poorly of any Barnard girl that tries to pretend they went to Columbia.


Do they feel the same way about SGS students who say they went to Columbia? After reading about how Columbia fudges their numbers to USNWR, I wouldn’t be thinking too highly of the entire school.


No, SGS is, unfortunately, part of the Columbia Corporation. Barnard is not. Barnard is a separate corporation. Barnard has its own President, its own Board of Trustees and its own endowment.

Columbia College, The Fu School of Engineering, and Columbia School of General Studies all have the same President, Board of Trustees and endowment.


You’re trying to make this into an either/or question and it isn’t. It’s a partnership. It’s unique. They’re affiliated. Barnard’s own website says that it’s under the Columbia umbrella. (See the link which I provided.) You can try to make it into something else, but it isn’t.

Teacher’s College was founded as a separate institution from Columbia University, but it later became affiliated with Columbia muc the way that Barnard is now affiliated. Columbua includes if us affiliated with 17 schools and programs. Schools with which it is affiliated include Barnard College, Jewish Theological
Seminary, Teacher’s College, and Union Theological Seminary. See link:

https://www.tc.columbia.edu/student-affairs/about-us/tc-understanding-the-affiliation/

A lot of this is hair splitting because it makes little to no difference in the lives of the students who attend college there. Whether it’s an affiliation and a partnership or whether it were one big university with separate schools and college, it functions in the same way for the students who attend and go to class every day. The differences are more technical than they are real in the lives of students. In the end, Barnard students get a degree endorsed by both Barnard itself and by Columbia University.


I am well aware that Barnard purports to be under Columbia’s umbrella, but Barnard is not part of the Columbia Corporation. Neither is Columbia Teachers College. Columbia’ website lists three undergraduate schools: Columbia College, the Fu School of Engineering, and the School of General Studies. Barnard can claim whatever it wants but who’s a part of Columbia is up to Columbia. Barnard could have been a part of Columbia, but, thank goodness, they refused to merge with Columbia.
Anonymous
No one should try to hawk off Barnard as Columbia. It just comes off as desperate.
Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Go to: