Does anyone else find Paris Hilton and Ivanka trump very attractive?

[Anonymous]

I am black. Ivanka is beautiful to me, but not Paris. She is someone whose just above average looks have been vastly altered by makeup and surgery. Ivanka inherited the lovely bone structure of her mother. I think that the sister of Paris is actually far more naturally attractive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.
Paris does know how to look good for a camera, but I wouldn't say she's pretty or cute, let alone beautiful.
Ivanka is just repulsive.

You are legally blind.

No, I just don't find either of them attractive, unlike you and OP.
Attractiveness is subjective.

Who do you find attractive for point of reference?

Salma Hayek
Michelle Pfeiffer
Catherine Zeta Jones
Freida Pinto
Cate Blanchett
Monica Bellucci
Rachel Weisz
Elizabeth Hurley
Naomi Campbell
Jacqueline Bissett
Sharon Stone
Zendaya

A small selection of famous women I find attractive.

(Obviously they are not all currently in their prime).

Dark brunettes aren't the only beauties in the world.

I am a dark brunette myself and do think Paris and Ivanka are attractive. Perhaps not knockout stunners, but certainly beautiful enough. Almost all of the women of that celebrity status have had plastic surgeries, so it's not really fair to call them "plastic" compared to anyone else.

I’m a dark brunette, too and completely agree with you! I’m downright disturbed by the pretty, White Blonde girl hate on this board. I dare say the posters doth protest too much about the clear objective attractiveness of both Paris and Ivana. I hate to say it, but a lot of the posters sound very jealous and very racist.

Paris and Ivanka are attractive. They’re not the most beautiful women who ever lived, but they’re very cute no matter how you cut it. Ivanka has legs to die for.

On the same note, can we all stop pretending Michelle Obama is beautiful?

This is a very racist post.

Halle Berry is beautiful. Michelle Obama is not an attractive woman.

+1
My preference is a more olive tone with dark brown hair, like Salma Hayek. But if you can combine that with light colored eyes - that would be my ideal. Same coloring as Mila Kunis with finer features. Mila has a broad nose.

[Anonymous]

The difference in our perspectives is interesting. I am the black PP. I find Billie Eilish pretty. Her eyes are stunning and her features symmetrical. Michelle Obama is immaculately groomed and extremely stylish. Many of the black beauties lauded in the mainstream media are or were actually biracial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They're both pointy Barbies, wear horrible clothes and far too much make up. They also always look like they are posing, like dolls. Honestly I find it difficult to imagine anyone finds that attractive.

They’ve also had a lot of surgeries.

+1 noses for sure

They are both basically pretty, in a way that most women with access to money are. But I imagine both of them look significantly different without makeup or hair styling, which is why I think most people wouldn’t consider them attractive. There’s an awareness that their attractiveness is generic/fake. Also, I think the proportions of Ivanka’s head/neck are off - I realize many fashion models have similar, but it just makes me think of a bird.

It's the drop off of the lip to throat coupled with a large top. She is like a pigeon. I think she's had a chin added by now but the outfits they lean towards in politics are not flattering. If she walked into a room as a stranger, I'd say she was a pretty but had an awkard gait. If Paris walked into a room as a stranger every head would turn and people would agree she is beautiful. This is about their made up/ well dressed presented selves. Obviously without makeup with plain clothes it could flip or who knows!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am black. Ivanka is beautiful to me, but not Paris. She is someone whose just above average looks have been vastly altered by makeup and surgery. Ivanka inherited the lovely bone structure of her mother. I think that the sister of Paris is actually far more naturally attractive.

Ivanka has had a LOT more surgery than Paris and I would argue did not inherit the best of her mother. I think Ivanka is pretty enough, but that is after a ton of work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.
Paris does know how to look good for a camera, but I wouldn't say she's pretty or cute, let alone beautiful.
Ivanka is just repulsive.

You are legally blind.

No, I just don't find either of them attractive, unlike you and OP.
Attractiveness is subjective.

Who do you find attractive for point of reference?

Salma Hayek
Michelle Pfeiffer
Catherine Zeta Jones
Freida Pinto
Cate Blanchett
Monica Bellucci
Rachel Weisz
Elizabeth Hurley
Naomi Campbell
Jacqueline Bissett
Sharon Stone
Zendaya

A small selection of famous women I find attractive.

(Obviously they are not all currently in their prime).

Dark brunettes aren't the only beauties in the world.

I am a dark brunette myself and do think Paris and Ivanka are attractive. Perhaps not knockout stunners, but certainly beautiful enough. Almost all of the women of that celebrity status have had plastic surgeries, so it's not really fair to call them "plastic" compared to anyone else.

But as pp said, attraction is subjective, so maybe they have a self admitted thing for brunettes.

I think facial beauty is a very specific thing that is not necessarily tied to attraction. Jodie Comer for instance is said to have like, the most symmetrical face in hollywood



I don't think she's extremely attractive but I do think she has a very interesting and aesthetically pleasing face.

I think Angelina is very beautiful and Gal Gadot. I think Bridgette Bardot was a very beautiful blonde. 2001 Gwen Stefani. Christy Brinkley. Kate Moss. Heidi Klum. These are people with unique and beautiful faces.

I definitely think Paris wins between Paris and Ivanka and it is because she has not messed that much with her face. She still looks like Paris Hilton. She has always looked like Paris Hilton. Ivanka does not really LOOK like Ivanka anymore and that is where she went wrong. Being ATTRACTIVE or appealing isn't just about what you look like but yes how you carry yourself. Paris has been confidently Paris and that has really made a difference in how well she has aged IMO. This is the difference between Kourt/Kim and Khloe too.

The hair and makeup change but paris is still paris:


Ivanka's face has changed so much that she has lost all the unique aspects that made her look like herself

Wow! Ivanka even changed her eye color!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am black. Ivanka is beautiful to me, but not Paris. She is someone whose just above average looks have been vastly altered by makeup and surgery. Ivanka inherited the lovely bone structure of her mother. I think that the sister of Paris is actually far more naturally attractive.

Ivanka has had a LOT more surgery than Paris and I would argue did not inherit the best of her mother. I think Ivanka is pretty enough, but that is after a ton of work.

+1 She inherited just enough from her mom to have a base to work with, but the her face has basically been surgically reconstructed from the eyes down at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am black. Ivanka is beautiful to me, but not Paris. She is someone whose just above average looks have been vastly altered by makeup and surgery. Ivanka inherited the lovely bone structure of her mother. I think that the sister of Paris is actually far more naturally attractive.

Ivanka has had a LOT more surgery than Paris and I would argue did not inherit the best of her mother. I think Ivanka is pretty enough, but that is after a ton of work.

+1 She inherited just enough from her mom to have a base to work with, but the her face has basically been surgically reconstructed from the eyes down at this point.

She looks pretty in this old photo, and far more attractive than in recent photos. She looks natural.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

[Anonymous]

I think Ivanka had too much surgery.

[Anonymous]

Ivanka has no cheekbones to work with. This in it self makes her unattractive.

[Anonymous]

No Vanessa Williams in her peak, runs circles around Paris and Ivanka. Paris also has a lopsided droopy eye lid but her current angles make it unnoticeable. If you google her earlier photos you see it more.