Anonymous wrote:9:37's tone was a bit insensitive and I disagree with the notion that a nanny does not need insurance, but she is correct in her assertion that the problem lies in the nanny's lifestyle expectations.
$15 an hour is not a rate that affords a great lifestyle, but as in any career, a nanny who is new or lacks a college degree should not expect to earn as much as someone with better credentials or a better skillset just because she wants a certain lifestyle. When I was a new college graduate earning a ridiculously low administrative assistant salary in New York City, I managed by renting a single room for a while and then living with roommates in an apartment where we converted the living room into a bedroom, so we had no real common space. This kind of arrangement is very typical for young professionals in NYC. A few years later I had worked up and was earning more, so I upgraded to a rundown studio that was maybe 350 square feet total without a real kitchen. It wasn't great, but that is what I could afford at the time. Eventually I went back to school and found a way to earn myself better housing and more luxuries.
So, while I recognize that $1500 is low for a one-bedroom apartment in DC proper, I agree with 9:37 that a one bedroom apartment is a luxury for a nanny earning $15 per hour. If the nanny is ambitious and great at her job, she should be able to work up to a better rate and lifestyle over time, like everyone else in every other profession. Also, very few nannies in DC work 40 hours a week, so the income level in OP's post is artificially low.
Arguments like this are appealing because it is easier to attack the individual then to take on a poorly functioning system. No person should have to live without bare necessities. We aren't talking about a 'great lifestyle' here. If you reduce the rent to $1000 but add in utilities, washing clothes, and saving for emergencies you still get to an amount that is not sustainable on $15. And that is not a reflection of a nannies skill set. That is not the pay of a new graduate or someone without experience. That is the pay rate with all of those assets.
This same argument is used to block laws that protect child workers and increased the minimum wage. It focuses on the individual, suggesting that they alone create the social context that makes disparity possible. It suggests that the failure is in the individual because they could not make the world a better place to live in. It is the same argument used to fight civil rights legislation in the 60s and to deny women the right to vote. I am fed up of hearing it. There is an obvious inequity in working 45-50 hours per week and not being able to see a doctor when you are ill. This is not nannies 'living above their means.' Not nannies living in so called 'hip' neighborhoods. Not nannies wanting 'luxury' accommodations. Those words are being used to distract from what we are really asking for: that if we work forty hours a week our pay be enough to fill our fridge and keep our lights on.