OP here. I'm seriously not trying to rip off my nanny or determine the least amount she will accept or anything like that. We really like the nanny we want to make an offer to, and given that we are new to the nanny hiring world, we have little knowledge of what is fair and unfair. When I was thinking of asking references what they paid, it was more to get an idea of what she is currently making so I could offer her a buck or two MORE than what she is currently getting, given that the reference family and us have similar situations.
Obviously based on the responses here and just rethinking it myself, I'm not going to ask, I just really didn't know if it was standard since every job I have ever gotten asks my previous salary and then usually verifies with my previous employer. |
Nannies in the DC area earn 15-30/hr. |
How is this helpful? That's a seriously big range. . |
OP, there isn't anything particularly
OP, there isn't anything particularly wrong with checking a nanny's salary history, so you can ask if you want. The thing is, it probably isn't going to give you much information. What you need to do is research the market rates in your area, decide what the job will entail, and what sort of extras you are looking for in a nanny. Once you price out the job, that's the range for the job. Nannies are responsible for their own finances and are absolutely able to decide if your job is worth accepting. Don't start by asking the possible nanny her rate unless you have done your research first. They will inflate the rate and you can easily end of overpaying and that will not guarantee you a higher quality nanny. For example, nannies in the DC are make $15-17/hr for one child and $16-18/hr for two kids with no housework other than cleaning up after themselves and kids (including kid laundry only) Unless there are three or more kids and extra chores or duties, there isn't a reason to pay over $20/hr in DC. Actually, I would pay $20+/hr for a nanny with special needs experience. A nanny who has 15+ years experience might think she is worth $25/hr...and maybe she is, but not to me. My job doesn't require that experience and is not worth paying extra for. However, the FTM with triplets down the street might be very willing to pay more for that experience. In the end, the nanny's salary history is irrelevant. Each job is different and it is the job and its requirements that set the rate. That's why nanny rates are pretty consistent in a geographic area. |
every family we asked amongst 5 nannies answered that and said if it was cash or not. totally fine. |
that was a troll nanny trying to scare who knows who. |
I think this would be a highly inappropriate question to ask.
If they offer to inform you, then that is one thing. But to inquire on your own is just rude + very intrusive. Know your boundaries. You are calling them to ask about her capabilities as a nanny, not about her payscale. |
Same here. References disclosed rate and scope of job (another typical ref question). Most of the nannies we interviewed were from neighborhood list serv posts from the parents themselves. |
You aren't a nanny, so quoting what YOU would pay and stating it as an average, would be as ignorant as me telling you what I think you should earn. I often wonder if some of the parents on here, missed the humanity gene, but overdosed on the self-centered and selfish one instead. |
When you call my former references, they call me to tell me what they thought of you.
If you asked inappropriate questions, my former employers recommend that I eliminate you as a possibility. So beware. |
Why are the Dcum nannies so violently scared of their comp record? You're going to get market rates and it doesn't take long for most families to talk to other MBs and figure those out. No need to exaggerate and attempt to bully on an anonymous forum.
Beware. Ooooo. Some employer might be scared into overpaying you. Yeah right. |
Next. |
OP, totally legitimate question. Most employers ask about former pay rates. |
Ok - I admit I only skimmed this essay but I think the point is that you were offered a job at an hourly rate that you didn't want to accept, but you had other offers that were more attractive. You took a job that appealed to you more. Someone else took the job you didn't want. The employers with the twins didn't get you with all your experience but they got someone more affordable who was happy to accept and they have room to give that person raises. Everyone wins right? That's the free market - if that family wanted you badly enough they had to pay more, but they didn't and found someone else. You got the same hourly rate with less work - so you're happy presumably. Except that you want to whine. Or you're one of our resident trolls with endless free time to fabricate scenarios on which you can build a rant. |
Sigh.
There were several points I made, but the most important one is that they were trying to use my previous wages to justify paying me a lower rate, but my previous wages are not relevant for many reasons: 1) their position requires a lot of housework, which none of my previous jobs did 2) their position was taking care of infant twins, when none of the jobs I held with said references were for the care of more than one child 3) the majority of my positions were from more than three years ago 4) since those positions I have not only gained more professional nanny experience but I have also completed my ECE degree as well as other childcare related studies They clearly weren't factoring any of that information in; they were just looking for justification for offering me a low wage. Rather than look at themselves and say "maybe we need to reevaluate our needs, maybe we don't really need the nanny to wash the windows and sanitize moms breast milk pumping equipment," they were just wanting to say "oh, well she only made $14/hr in this other job, so we can feel totally justified in offering $15/hr for ours!" (Again, not taking into account any of the factors I have listed above.) The point I was trying to make about someone else accepting the job at $13/hr is that you get what you pay for when you pay a low rate: 1) someone with little to no experience 2) someone who is not committed--first nanny left suddenly (she says it was health issues, but that could've easily been an excuse to leave for a better position), and second nanny is only a week in and already contemplating quitting!! |