It really is amusing. I guess we are all legends in our own minds. I'm willing to bet a good chunk of these people are wrong about their supposed One That Got Away status. |
I think I may be because he went out of his way to contact my sister (I keep a low profile for work reasons) to let me know that he was no longer angry at me for ending it. I hadn't thought about him in 25 years! |
I posted +1000 and I honestly think part of it is men are more sentimental/prone to missing an ex than women. Within my friend group almost every woman has been contacted by an ex at some point or another- I would say a fraction of my guy friends are contacted by an ex gf. I think men like to put on a front of being unaffected and if anything that contributes to having trouble getting over a person |
No, I think the guys are horny and looking for someone to f*ck. |
Not sure this post's logic works: 1) "Almost every woman has been contacted by ex" - In our society, men are much more likely to initiate romantic contact with a woman than women are with a man. The fact that ex bf initiated the contact with the ex gf is likely given the fact that the man initiated the contact with the woman in the first place. 2) "fraction of guy friends contacted by ex gf" - Please see the point above. Therefore, fact that men are more likely to contact an ex than women are could be more related more to the fact that men normally contact women in the first place, not how much the ex bf misses the ex gf. This is interesting since based on this thread alone, the female posters post much more often that they are the "one that got away" than they male posters do. I realize that female posters outnumber male poster so this could account for this fact. It is also possible these women believe they "got away" when if fact other women also believe they "got away" from the same man. It other words, it is very unlikely any one woman is the "one and only one that got away" for any one man. |
I don't think that applies. Initiate contact- yes, at the beginning. During a relationship, that pretty much goes out the window. And certainly after. If I really wanted to contact an ex, I would have zero issue doing it, as would most women I know. |
The logix is still flawed.
Contact during a relationship is not relevant since contacting each other is what relationship is about. Contact after a relationship is over is different because the prior relationship is concluded. Any new contact is the beginning of a new relationship or the beginning of a different type of relationship (i.e., we became friends after we broke up). Saying "I would not have a problem contacting my ex but do not because I do not want to" is circular reasoning. The most useful post is one noting that men often contact former lovers to have sex again. He called me to get laid makes so much more sense than he called be because I was the one that got away. Do many of your friends call former lovers to have sex with them? How many have been called by a past sexual partner seeking to have sex again? |
Utterly and completely absurd. The only time when it's the "man contact firsts rule" is at the very, very beginning of a relationship. Once you've slept together and seen each other sleep and sleep deprived and every side of each other it would be patently ridiculous for a woman to be sitting by the phone waiting for the man she likes to call. She'd reach out. And I also know, from speaking to my female friends, that if they WANTED to reach out, they would. No one expects courtship rituals after you've dated and been that intimate. |
Your problem is you cannot read. The poster said that in a relationship each person calls the other. That is why it is called a relationship. No one is waiting by the phone for call.
If a relationship is over, it is over and there no longer "courtship rituals" for relationships that are over. |
Well, I kind of think you were the one that got away. But the others? Bah. Most of the time I think it is just a romantic notion of wanting to the be one that got away, when in reality, it was a break up for a good reason. |
Exactly. So either side would call |