Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous

post reply Forum Index » Infants, Toddlers, & Preschoolers
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:04
quote
Anonymous
Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.

On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:07
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My infant daughter occasionally sports a giant flower headband (she even has a bright pink one - so ha!).

She doesn't, however, care in the least what any of you think of it. Nor do I.

And to the poster who added: "most of the infants are hideous as well" - I'm fairly sure that my daughter has better manners and judgment than you at 3 months.

Thanks for the wonderful exchange on this Wednesday morning.



What does that have to do with how cute an infant looks? And at 3 months, your baby is no longer and "infant". Just say baby since she is no longer fresh from the womb.


You are a truly stupid, ignorant, and just a plain dumbass.
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:08
quote
Anonymous
I know a girl from hs that has a DD that is 4 months old and apparently has the girl in headbands everyday (ala fb pictures). She has even taken it a step further and broke out her glue gun and is selling these dumb things on etsy
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:08
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.

On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!


How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:14
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.

On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!


How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?


Hahaha perhaps by referring to a lexicographic error as a grammatical error? I don't care if it's anonymous. The fool saying a 3 mo is not an infant has shown themselves to be a fool, whether identified or not.
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:16
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.

On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!


How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?


Hahaha perhaps by referring to a lexicographic error as a grammatical error? I don't care if it's anonymous. The fool saying a 3 mo is not an infant has shown themselves to be a fool, whether identified or not.


"I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves."

Can you reallly be so dumb?
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:18
quote
cuzimawesome
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.

On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!


How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?


Hahaha perhaps by referring to a lexicographic error as a grammatical error? I don't care if it's anonymous. The fool saying a 3 mo is not an infant has shown themselves to be a fool, whether identified or not.


"I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves."

Can you reallly be so dumb?


Dude. Are people really arguing over this?
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:22
quote
Anonymous
cuzimawesome wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.

On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!


How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?


Hahaha perhaps by referring to a lexicographic error as a grammatical error? I don't care if it's anonymous. The fool saying a 3 mo is not an infant has shown themselves to be a fool, whether identified or not.


"I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves."

Can you reallly be so dumb?


Dude. Are people really arguing over this?


You don't see the irony?
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:25
quote
cuzimawesome
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:
cuzimawesome wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.

On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!


How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?


Hahaha perhaps by referring to a lexicographic error as a grammatical error? I don't care if it's anonymous. The fool saying a 3 mo is not an infant has shown themselves to be a fool, whether identified or not.


"I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves."

Can you reallly be so dumb?


Dude. Are people really arguing over this?


You don't see the irony?


Ha! It took me a moment.
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:30
quote
Anonymous
I do know a mom of a baby with one of those two names who dresses her in these. Was the PP's comment about a specific child - or more about the idea that if you're likely to name your kid something trendy and last-name-y like Addison or Emerson, you're more likely to put gigantoid, fake flowers on your daughter's head?
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:30
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My infant daughter occasionally sports a giant flower headband (she even has a bright pink one - so ha!).

She doesn't, however, care in the least what any of you think of it. Nor do I.

And to the poster who added: "most of the infants are hideous as well" - I'm fairly sure that my daughter has better manners and judgment than you at 3 months.

Thanks for the wonderful exchange on this Wednesday morning.


Train wreck alert!
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:32
quote
Anonymous
cuzimawesome wrote:These? They're kinda cute, but I've never been a fan of any kind of headband on a baby girl. I actually think these are cuter than those thin ones that moms put on their babies. But yeah... still not a fan, but to each his own! This is not an ugly baby by the way.





EW, it looks like a tumor.
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:33
quote
Anonymous
Not much of a fan for my own kid, but she was born with a head full of hair. Still they seem to work on other people's kids.

Honestly, I don't have enough of an opinion on this kind of thing to start a whole thread.

What I DO have an opinion on is why there isn't more green or red clothing in the girls' department.
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:38
quote
Anonymous
I think those headbands are adorable. I have a boy, but if I ever have a girl I'll definitely use them. (especially if the girl is like my son and doesn't get hair until 2.5)!!
[Post New]04/20/2011 09:45
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think those headbands are adorable. I have a boy, but if I ever have a girl I'll definitely use them. (especially if the girl is like my son and doesn't get hair until 2.5)!!


Is there a correlation between educational levels and those who buy this shit?
post reply Forum Index » Infants, Toddlers, & Preschoolers
Message Quick Reply
Go to: 

Search   Recent Topics   Hottest Topics