Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the texts from the AD phone, the one thing that stood out to me was the South County coach was shook from well before he was officially even hired. It seems to me that the thought of him having to coach against this man. So if one truly wanted to “speculate” that this has been a conspiracy against Hayfield from the very beginning. Now please someone tell me how you can’t see that being the case. He was the ONLY coach mentioned in the text and now it was him that spearheaded the coaches boycotting. It’s something you have to at least consider.

How about because it is WRONG. Not because he was SCARED, or SHOOK, or RACIST. I cannot with the self important, misinformed Hayfield lovers.

What was wrong, the man hadn’t even been hired yet, but folks knew that apparently that potential hiring would shake Panonni. So, yes he was definitely shook, believe what you want to.

Its SO weird to me that you think this comment is important at all. Who cares what some anonymous person thought about what some other random FCPS football coach would think about the Hayfield cheating?

What’s weird is we’re supposed to believe everything else the text threads said but can’t dissect everything IN the text thread. In a court of law all that’s needed is to present any sort of reasonable doubt. Nownlet that meditate in your spirit

Your point is that an Anonymous person thought a South County coach would be upset that Hayfield was hiring a notorious cheater.
What is your point again?

Notorious, what again has he been proven guilty of? What? Pls do elaborate. Allegations are not facts, simply they are questions one would like to have answered

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the texts from the AD phone, the one thing that stood out to me was the South County coach was shook from well before he was officially even hired. It seems to me that the thought of him having to coach against this man. So if one truly wanted to “speculate” that this has been a conspiracy against Hayfield from the very beginning. Now please someone tell me how you can’t see that being the case. He was the ONLY coach mentioned in the text and now it was him that spearheaded the coaches boycotting. It’s something you have to at least consider.

How about because it is WRONG. Not because he was SCARED, or SHOOK, or RACIST. I cannot with the self important, misinformed Hayfield lovers.

What was wrong, the man hadn’t even been hired yet, but folks knew that apparently that potential hiring would shake Panonni. So, yes he was definitely shook, believe what you want to.

Its SO weird to me that you think this comment is important at all. Who cares what some anonymous person thought about what some other random FCPS football coach would think about the Hayfield cheating?

What’s weird is we’re supposed to believe everything else the text threads said but can’t dissect everything IN the text thread. In a court of law all that’s needed is to present any sort of reasonable doubt. Nownlet that meditate in your spirit

Your point is that an Anonymous person thought a South County coach would be upset that Hayfield was hiring a notorious cheater.
What is your point again?

Notorious, what again has he been proven guilty of? What? Pls do elaborate. Allegations are not facts, simply they are questions one would like to have answered

notorious definition: generally known and talked of. especially : widely and unfavorably known. notoriously adverb.

There were always lots of rumors about his cheating with kids coming up from Stafford to attend public school at Freedom.

Prime example: Creepy Karen lives in Frederickburg and has a Fredericksburg church grift going with her husband, yet somehow her son played for Freedom last year.

Anonymous wrote:As a parent of young elementary schoolers on the other side of the county, it is very off putting to keep getting emails from the superintendent about this. The first email just drew attention to something I was not even aware was a problem. Can we get a superintendent that focuses on real issues? She should expect everyone in the chain of command to follow the rules, and when they don't, quickly fix it. Why is she bending over backward to cover for a football team?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent of young elementary schoolers on the other side of the county, it is very off putting to keep getting emails from the superintendent about this. The first email just drew attention to something I was not even aware was a problem. Can we get a superintendent that focuses on real issues? She should expect everyone in the chain of command to follow the rules, and when they don't, quickly fix it. Why is she bending over backward to cover for a football team?

y

I agree with you there are so many big issues that affect all students at every level and this is where the focus is?! I think FCPS is shadier than we know....thats why they are covering this up-house of cards.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the texts from the AD phone, the one thing that stood out to me was the South County coach was shook from well before he was officially even hired. It seems to me that the thought of him having to coach against this man. So if one truly wanted to “speculate” that this has been a conspiracy against Hayfield from the very beginning. Now please someone tell me how you can’t see that being the case. He was the ONLY coach mentioned in the text and now it was him that spearheaded the coaches boycotting. It’s something you have to at least consider.

How about because it is WRONG. Not because he was SCARED, or SHOOK, or RACIST. I cannot with the self important, misinformed Hayfield lovers.

What was wrong, the man hadn’t even been hired yet, but folks knew that apparently that potential hiring would shake Panonni. So, yes he was definitely shook, believe what you want to.

Its SO weird to me that you think this comment is important at all. Who cares what some anonymous person thought about what some other random FCPS football coach would think about the Hayfield cheating?

What’s weird is we’re supposed to believe everything else the text threads said but can’t dissect everything IN the text thread. In a court of law all that’s needed is to present any sort of reasonable doubt. Nownlet that meditate in your spirit

Your point is that an Anonymous person thought a South County coach would be upset that Hayfield was hiring a notorious cheater.
What is your point again?

Notorious, what again has he been proven guilty of? What? Pls do elaborate. Allegations are not facts, simply they are questions one would like to have answered

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent of young elementary schoolers on the other side of the county, it is very off putting to keep getting emails from the superintendent about this. The first email just drew attention to something I was not even aware was a problem. Can we get a superintendent that focuses on real issues? She should expect everyone in the chain of command to follow the rules, and when they don't, quickly fix it. Why is she bending over backward to cover for a football team?

y

I agree with you there are so many big issues that affect all students at every level and this is where the focus is?! I think FCPS is shadier than we know....thats why they are covering this up-house of cards.

As a parent of a 9th grader and a 5th grader, so children in both high school and elementary school, I don't think FCPS is that shady. I think this was mostly one school, one school administration going totally rogue. But Reid's immediate defense before she even knew what the issue is, was dumb. And every frantic long email makes it worse.

FrankWinston wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the texts from the AD phone, the one thing that stood out to me was the South County coach was shook from well before he was officially even hired. It seems to me that the thought of him having to coach against this man. So if one truly wanted to “speculate” that this has been a conspiracy against Hayfield from the very beginning. Now please someone tell me how you can’t see that being the case. He was the ONLY coach mentioned in the text and now it was him that spearheaded the coaches boycotting. It’s something you have to at least consider.

How about because it is WRONG. Not because he was SCARED, or SHOOK, or RACIST. I cannot with the self important, misinformed Hayfield lovers.

What was wrong, the man hadn’t even been hired yet, but folks knew that apparently that potential hiring would shake Panonni. So, yes he was definitely shook, believe what you want to.

Its SO weird to me that you think this comment is important at all. Who cares what some anonymous person thought about what some other random FCPS football coach would think about the Hayfield cheating?

What’s weird is we’re supposed to believe everything else the text threads said but can’t dissect everything IN the text thread. In a court of law all that’s needed is to present any sort of reasonable doubt. Nownlet that meditate in your spirit

Your point is that an Anonymous person thought a South County coach would be upset that Hayfield was hiring a notorious cheater.
What is your point again?

Notorious, what again has he been proven guilty of? What? Pls do elaborate. Allegations are not facts, simply they are questions one would like to have answered

My god you Hayfraud boosters set yourselves up every single time.

What's he been proven guilty of? Well...I don't know...

How about playing ineligible players or did he not have to forfeit games back in 2021 for doing so?
How about playing ineligible players when he was told not to, twice, by his principal, Inez Bryant?
How about illegal/inappropriate use of county property for his own personal gain while at Potomac? Or was he not fined for doing that?
How about yet more illegal/inappropriate use of county property for his own personal gain while at Freedom? Or was it not recommended by investigators that he face disciplinary actions for doing so?
How about lying about his credentials to get the job he has at Hayfield?
How about verbally threatening a female online?
How about never filing the proper paperwork for his so-called nonprofit?

I could go on... but, he is clearly a notorious cheater.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent of young elementary schoolers on the other side of the county, it is very off putting to keep getting emails from the superintendent about this. The first email just drew attention to something I was not even aware was a problem. Can we get a superintendent that focuses on real issues? She should expect everyone in the chain of command to follow the rules, and when they don't, quickly fix it. Why is she bending over backward to cover for a football team?

y

I agree with you there are so many big issues that affect all students at every level and this is where the focus is?! I think FCPS is shadier than we know....thats why they are covering this up-house of cards.

As a parent of a 9th grader and a 5th grader, so children in both high school and elementary school, I don't think FCPS is that shady. I think this was mostly one school, one school administration going totally rogue. But Reid's immediate defense before she even knew what the issue is, was dumb. And every frantic long email makes it worse.

The two emails in such a short timeframe is concerning. Def looks bad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent of young elementary schoolers on the other side of the county, it is very off putting to keep getting emails from the superintendent about this. The first email just drew attention to something I was not even aware was a problem. Can we get a superintendent that focuses on real issues? She should expect everyone in the chain of command to follow the rules, and when they don't, quickly fix it. Why is she bending over backward to cover for a football team?

y

I agree with you there are so many big issues that affect all students at every level and this is where the focus is?! I think FCPS is shadier than we know....thats why they are covering this up-house of cards.

As a parent of a 9th grader and a 5th grader, so children in both high school and elementary school, I don't think FCPS is that shady. I think this was mostly one school, one school administration going totally rogue. But Reid's immediate defense before she even knew what the issue is, was dumb. And every frantic long email makes it worse.

Anonymous wrote:As a parent of a 9th grader and a 5th grader, so children in both high school and elementary school, I don't think FCPS is that shady. I think this was mostly one school, one school administration going totally rogue. But Reid's immediate defense before she even knew what the issue is, was dumb. And every frantic long email makes it worse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent of young elementary schoolers on the other side of the county, it is very off putting to keep getting emails from the superintendent about this. The first email just drew attention to something I was not even aware was a problem. Can we get a superintendent that focuses on real issues? She should expect everyone in the chain of command to follow the rules, and when they don't, quickly fix it. Why is she bending over backward to cover for a football team?

Good question. I believe this is just an example of how she deals with things. I believe she brushes things under the rug, doesn’t communicate. And tries to make plans without understanding the implications of her decisions. Grading policies and behavioral issues are good examples that are not getting the attention they should be getting.