Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am starting to think these SB members do not even understand the controversy.

Mostly they don't and they want to move on to their issues that they do understand. They don't want to deal with this issue that has nothing to do with them. Except that it does. Ignoring a problem works sometimes. Other times, it doesn't. We'll see which one this is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

BS. My kid has friends at Langley and I’m familiar with the Langley football roster. All of those kids don’t live within the zoning boundaries and some left private school to play football at Langley.

Langley has even had far worse off field scandals due to the actions of the head football coach and a teacher this year.

Langley has white kids and white coaches so there is no outrage and not even much mention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

BS. My kid has friends at Langley and I’m familiar with the Langley football roster. All of those kids don’t live within the zoning boundaries and some left private school to play football at Langley.

Langley has even had far worse off field scandals due to the actions of the head football coach and a teacher this year.

Langley has white kids and white coaches so there is no outrage and not even much mention.

Anonymous wrote:To the person who posted the Marcia letter- was it really signed: “Kind Regards, Marcia Signature First Name Only”???? If so, it’s the most blatant tell me you didn’t write this yourself that without telling me!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

BS. My kid has friends at Langley and I’m familiar with the Langley football roster. All of those kids don’t live within the zoning boundaries and some left private school to play football at Langley.

Langley has even had far worse off field scandals due to the actions of the head football coach and a teacher this year.

Langley has white kids and white coaches so there is no outrage and not even much mention.

They don't have to live within the school zone if they have a valid transfer from FCPS (usually for academic reasons).
Kids are allowed to transfer from privates to their zoned publics for any reason other than sports. I guess these kids and parents were smart enough to keep their mouths shut.

Anonymous wrote:If we could pay school board members a reasonable salary, maybe we could get some competent candidates.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

BS. My kid has friends at Langley and I’m familiar with the Langley football roster. All of those kids don’t live within the zoning boundaries and some left private school to play football at Langley.

Langley has even had far worse off field scandals due to the actions of the head football coach and a teacher this year.

Langley has white kids and white coaches so there is no outrage and not even much mention.

They don't have to live within the school zone if they have a valid transfer from FCPS (usually for academic reasons).
Kids are allowed to transfer from privates to their zoned publics for any reason other than sports. I guess these kids and parents were smart enough to keep their mouths shut.

There was no scrutiny or allegations for them to respond to either.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

BS. My kid has friends at Langley and I’m familiar with the Langley football roster. All of those kids don’t live within the zoning boundaries and some left private school to play football at Langley.

Langley has even had far worse off field scandals due to the actions of the head football coach and a teacher this year.

Langley has white kids and white coaches so there is no outrage and not even much mention.

They don't have to live within the school zone if they have a valid transfer from FCPS (usually for academic reasons).
Kids are allowed to transfer from privates to their zoned publics for any reason other than sports. I guess these kids and parents were smart enough to keep their mouths shut.

There was no scrutiny or allegations for them to respond to either.

Likely because they didn't do anything wrong.

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

Anonymous wrote:That letter is wildly inaccurate. Did she post it online anywhere with open comments?

And why did she only talk to Hayfield stakeholders? ALL FCPS students, teachers, and parents have a stake in this cheating scandal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

BS. My kid has friends at Langley and I’m familiar with the Langley football roster. All of those kids don’t live within the zoning boundaries and some left private school to play football at Langley.

Langley has even had far worse off field scandals due to the actions of the head football coach and a teacher this year.

Langley has white kids and white coaches so there is no outrage and not even much mention.