HS Party with Alcohol... Death

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a lawyer but I thought it was commonly known.

What in the heck are you talking about this time?

Sorry- that he left and returned.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is different than the Bethesda magazine article. Kids DIED. I am pissed that lawyer got away with just fines but this new case - the Wootton one. The Dad knew, he joked with them, he knew there was two 30 packs and vodka there and counting the number of kids being no more than 20. Well you do the math. He didn't take the keys of any drivers. Those 4 boys left his house intoxicated after all the alcohol ran out, got into a car accident and 2 died.

How is this not automatic involuntary manslaughter? If this Dad doesn't get jail time and the boy does, I will completely have given up on our judicial system.

[/quote]

+1
[/quote]
+2
But no one's going to lock-up. They're above the law. Just watch...[/quote]

Does anyone believe there'll be jail for anyone for these killings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a lawyer but I thought it was commonly known.

What in the heck are you talking about this time?

Sorry- that he left and returned.

There *you* go again with "he." You need to be simply ignored if you don't communicate like a big boy.

[Anonymous]

THE DRIVER LEFT AND THEN RETURNED.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:THE DRIVER LEFT AND THEN RETURNED.

You mean Sam Ellis? Ok. Do you have a point to make? Who cares if he left and returned. Please say what you want to say, or shut up. Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Someone drove him home. He didn't drive himself home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone drove him home. He didn't drive himself home.

Go away with your stupid nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sad to say, but when I read on here that the father involved is an attorney, I automatically thought, "oh, then he'll get off without any punishment". Nothing is going to change unless adults are held responsible for allowing these drinking parties at their house.

I'm afraid you are right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone drove him home. He didn't drive himself home.

Go away with your stupid nonsense.

WTF? He got back in his car and came back. Why are you arguing?

[Anonymous]

This one bully pp with the non-stop screeching and put-downs of any other poster trying to make a point, the same pp who just loves to name names, and the same one who does not know all the facts or law? That pp? Is ruining this thread and any possible good that could have come from it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This one bully pp with the non-stop screeching and put-downs of any other poster trying to make a point, the same pp who just loves to name names, and the same one who does not know all the facts or law? That pp? Is ruining this thread and any possible good that could have come from it.

What point were you trying to make, Sir?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This one bully pp with the non-stop screeching and put-downs of any other poster trying to make a point, the same pp who just loves to name names, and the same one who does not know all the facts or law? That pp? Is ruining this thread and any possible good that could have come from it.

What point were you trying to make, Sir?

You wrecked the thread. Bully for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is about hs kids drinking alcohol and the party hosting parent that allow it.

Jail time for these parents will put an end to it.
I'm convinced it's the only consequence they care about.

This is what 16:55 seems so mad about.

[Anonymous]

You bully better than anyone else. Bravo pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You bully better than anyone else. Bravo pp.

Last time you tried to derail, you got deleted. Perhaps focus on that point you were trying to make.