Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
|
M&D 2023 recruiting was a disaster?
Almost every girl on that team is going to a mid to high D1 school. 2 Maryland, 2 Clemson, 2 Brown, 2 Va Tech, ECU, BU and St Joseph's. Two girls decided not to play in college. I didn't even have to look it up because I know the girls on that team. You have a wholly different definition of a disaster for recruiting than I do. |
Appreciate the response and effort to lay out your thinking. You lost me at "[i]t's a weaker year for BLC which opens it up for everyone." No doubt BLC 27s have been a great team, but were area players on the Big 5 Baltimore clubs somehow prevented or dissuaded from considering Capital because BLC 27s were strong and somehow more proximate to CLC? That doesn't really make sense. I'm sure the Capital coaches would have been happy to see a strong player from one of those clubs at tryouts. Agree with the notion that there are more spots in general up for grabs in '28 without a BLC core likely to get offers, but I am less clear on why that is going to pull more girls from big 5 Baltimore clubs. The Sky Walkers comment also seems like a tangent. Capital Blue 26 isn't in the top 10 either, has a shorter history and track record, and most posters seem to still have great confidence in their recruiting chances--for good reason. I let the other poster's response on the disaster of '23 recruiting at one of those clubs stand... |
By M&D standards? Yes, a disaster. The facts prove it. 23s had two top 20s. 22s had nine: UMD (3), UNC, BC, Florida, Hopkins (2) and Marquette, plus Stanford, Duke, Yale, Harvard and others. 21s had 10: UVA (2), Florida (2), ND, UNC (2), MI, Syracuse, and Loyola plus Duke and two to G’town (a great academic). So yes … Compared to other M&D teams and the standard it claims to set as a perennial best, a disaster. |
Correction: M&D Black 24s had ten top 20s (not the 21s). |
All fair points - note my prior post specifically addressed unhappy DMV players on Md teams as being those most likely to consider a switch (rather than those having successful experiences). Players change clubs for all sorts of reasons. If they aren’t hitting the field, aren’t meshing with the Md club culture, or don’t like their coaches, etc, they might want to play for a club closer to home that’s known for attracting and developing the area’s best talent and sending players to great D1 programs and schools. As for the DMV 27s currently on Md clubs, those players knew they didn’t have a strong chance of making Cap Blue 27 because they weren’t previously known to Cap leadership (unlike the entire BLC 27 team). Others have said Cap brass knew well in advance who they were going to take for the team - any player unknown to them who believes they can show up to a two hour tryout with expectations of making Cap Blue 27 would need to be Izzy Scane to get the evaluators’ attention. No DMV 27 on any Md club has that kind of stuff. That’s why I suspect those players were disinclined to attend this week’s tryout. The lanes will be much wider for players from around the region to get noticed at a 28 Cap tryout given the weakness of the BLC class for reasons noted. |
Confirmed. |
|
Second attempt: Got it. Some solid points above. Enjoyed the civil colloquy. |
| So are BLC and Next Level even going to have 2028 teams? YJMA is non existent at 28, and the better Va metro players seem to be leaving. I assume Stars and Pride will benefit from that. |
The best player on Metro is leaving too. Except for Stars and Pride, the other 28 teams in the area are decimated and basically rec level. |
Where is VA Metro player going? |
| Who won US Nationals in DE this week, anyone know? |
The best players left on Metro left for Pride weeks ago. |
Hero's won the tourney going away. A really good 8 team bracket with Coppermine, Aces, Steps, YJs x2, Urban Elite, and Monsters Elit. There is a robust conversation on the Back of the Cage Maryland thread on why Coppermine lost to an inferior Urban Elite team. |
I am not aware this is true. |