new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The trolls are hard at work attacking the victims.

Victims? Julie Swetnick? The woman who was 3 years older than Kavanaugh, student at MC who went to Gaithersburg High and claimed she hung out at a bunch of Prep parties where a 16 year old Kavanaugh was part of a gang rape ring that was operating for months, if not years? Nobody knew about it until Avenatti broke it the day before CBF was to testify before the SJC?

That victim?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kav lied to Congress. Of course he should be impeached.

yep this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The trolls are hard at work attacking the victims.

I believe his accusers. I believe Kavanaugh should be impeached. The FBI never investigated the claims of the women who accused Kavanaugh, so there is no way for either side to claim they are in possession of all the facts.

First, an investigation of the accusations against K. If there's enough evidence, then yes, he should be impeached and removed from office.

I marvel that anyone actually admits to believing Julie Swetnik, much less refers to her as a “victim”. Alrighty, then!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trolls are hard at work attacking the victims.

Victims? Julie Swetnick? The woman who was 3 years older than Kavanaugh, student at MC who went to Gaithersburg High and claimed she hung out at a bunch of Prep parties where a 16 year old Kavanaugh was part of a gang rape ring that was operating for months, if not years? Nobody knew about it until Avenatti broke it the day before CBF was to testify before the SJC?

That victim?

Exactly. Completely credible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Julie Swetnick is back in the news!

https://twitter.com/Julio_Rosas11/status/1180894478430814208
Julio Rosas
@Julio_Rosas11
Julie Swetnick, who was represented by Michael Avenatti when she accused Kavanaugh, is here and the crowd chants at her, "We believe you!"

Amazing that a crowd of people can so totally discredit themselves with one 3-word chant.

Julie Swetnick is now really back in the news!!!

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/9/senators-push-for-prosecution-of-justice-kavanaugh/

The day after she actually had the nerve to show her face publicly in a capacity that was attacking Kavanaugh "Nine of the 12 Republican members on the Senate Judiciary Committee sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr and FBI Director Christopher Wray asking for an update to the committee’s four referrals for criminal investigation." The. Very. Next. Day.

Gassley had sent a letter to the FBI about a year ago asking them to probe this BS gang-rape nonsense and it looked like it was going nowhere. Then Swetnick decides to show up to an anti-Kavanaugh protest to a crowd of about 30 idiots chanting "we believe you". This appears to have been a slight miscalculation on her part. The latest letter is demanding a response no later than Oct. 21. She should have stayed under whatever rock she was hiding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harris has less support for her campaign than I do and I’m a transsexual catholic priest from Takoma Park.

JFC, you have to do an AMA!

[Anonymous]

You Kav groupies are really dug in. This will not end well for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You Kav groupies are really dug in. This will not end well for him.

You don’t have to be a “groupie” to defend someone who has been vilified with zero evidence. I can only hope you’re accused of something, decades after the allegations supposedly occurred. I wonder how you would possibly defend yourself against something that simply can’t be proven, or even substantiated. It’s innocent until proven guilty in this country, sweetie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You Kav groupies are really dug in. This will not end well for him.

It’s kinda over and Kavansugh is beginning another term in the court. Seems okay to me.

[Anonymous]

He should never have been confirmed. He failed the job interview! It's ridiculous to believe half of what he said under oath. If you want to then how about his performance in the interview process? No other job would have hired him. Was he under pressure sure, so are others in interviews. No way he should have gotten the job the way the talked to the people interviewing him. Lifetime appointment? UGH... Bringing his ten year old into the discussion, shame on him! There had to be another candidate.....

[Anonymous]

Even if he DID NOT do anything to those women, the PP is correct.

The way he behaved during his hearing was telling. No respect for the female senators who questioned him and complete and utter disrespect for authority.

An innocent man would not behave that way. Same with Trump. Birds of a feather. The $hit doesn't fall far from the a$$.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You Kav groupies are really dug in. This will not end well for him.

You don’t have to be a “groupie” to defend someone who has been vilified with zero evidence. I can only hope you’re accused of something, decades after the allegations supposedly occurred. I wonder how you would possibly defend yourself against something that simply can’t be proven, or even substantiated. It’s innocent until proven guilty in this country, sweetie.

WHO PAID HIS SIX FIGURE DEBT?

It's funny how none of you are concerned that he won't answer that?

He most definitely SHOULD have to answer for this, as concerns could arise and speculation made regarding corruption, bribery, pay-offs, etc.

I'm not saying that's what's occurring, however if he refuses to produce an explanation of just how such a high debt was paid, he then doesn't get to take offense when speculation of such starts to come to light.

[Anonymous]

I truly hope that those who tried to fabricate stories to derail K's nomination are held accountable. But, if they don't hold them LEGALLY accountable, I really think they will be met with karma.
Like Avenatti. Good to see karma will get him.

Just remember how low some people will go to prevent a nominee from being confirmed. And, be ready for the next one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You Kav groupies are really dug in. This will not end well for him.

You don’t have to be a “groupie” to defend someone who has been vilified with zero evidence. I can only hope you’re accused of something, decades after the allegations supposedly occurred. I wonder how you would possibly defend yourself against something that simply can’t be proven, or even substantiated. It’s innocent until proven guilty in this country, sweetie.

WHO PAID HIS SIX FIGURE DEBT?

It's funny how none of you are concerned that he won't answer that?

He most definitely SHOULD have to answer for this, as concerns could arise and speculation made regarding corruption, bribery, pay-offs, etc.

I'm not saying that's what's occurring, however if he refuses to produce an explanation of just how such a high debt was paid, he then doesn't get to take offense when speculation of such starts to come to light.

HIS PARENTS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You Kav groupies are really dug in. This will not end well for him.

You don’t have to be a “groupie” to defend someone who has been vilified with zero evidence. I can only hope you’re accused of something, decades after the allegations supposedly occurred. I wonder how you would possibly defend yourself against something that simply can’t be proven, or even substantiated. It’s innocent until proven guilty in this country, sweetie.

WHO PAID HIS SIX FIGURE DEBT?

It's funny how none of you are concerned that he won't answer that?

He most definitely SHOULD have to answer for this, as concerns could arise and speculation made regarding corruption, bribery, pay-offs, etc.

I'm not saying that's what's occurring, however if he refuses to produce an explanation of just how such a high debt was paid, he then doesn't get to take offense when speculation of such starts to come to light.

HIS PARENTS.

I want to know who paid the debt (and not from an internet board) but I also think that his behavior was 100% unacceptable. He should never have been confirmed. With a NORMAL president, he would not have even been nominated, because he is clearly easily compromised.