Fairfax County GT/AAP Appeals.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The aart refused to meet with me. But I do know I can request the file.


That's ridiculous that she refused to meet with you. Not sure why people like that work in schools.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Any thoughts about GBRS of 12 and WISC V of 127 odds?


I don't have any thoughts but am roughly in the same boat, with the same GBRS and a slighly lower FSIQ. Even though they review the new information with the appeal, I hope the decent GBRS improves our case. This whole process is very frustrating.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The aart refused to meet with me. But I do know I can request the file.


I'm kind of surprised you didn't request the file before appealing. They are required to give it to you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Even in appeals?

No. The only new documentation submitted to the committee is the documentation submitted by the parent for the appeal. The school has no say in the appeal decision.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:appeal was denied. wisc 130. GAI was 134.


You made me so nervous my DS has WISC 139 and GAI 144 with low GBRS



Dont get worry.. Our appeal was approved with WISC 139 same as yours and very low GBRS.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:appeal was denied. wisc 130. GAI was 134.


You made me so nervous my DS has WISC 139 and GAI 144 with low GBRS



Dont get worry.. Our appeal was approved with WISC 139 same as yours and very low GBRS.



Thanks, DS got in, both kids go to same school. What a big relief !
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The aart refused to meet with me. But I do know I can request the file.


That's ridiculous that she refused to meet with you. Not sure why people like that work in schools.


"Refused to meet with you?" Exactly how did that conversation go?
Anonymous
Received Acceptance - cogat 128, IQ 132. Thank you to all who encouraged to go through next step.
Anonymous
I asked aart for a meeting. was forwarded a link to the level ii/iii referral form.
when I asked further I was told I needed to discuss my concerns with the principal.

that was it, she was not helpful. I think her job is more doing one hour pullouts for part time aap kids, and doesn't help or involve herself with packets.
I was told to ask the office for a copy of the aap packet by her as well. she was not helpful.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I asked aart for a meeting. was forwarded a link to the level ii/iii referral form.
when I asked further I was told I needed to discuss my concerns with the principal.

that was it, she was not helpful. I think her job is more doing one hour pullouts for part time aap kids, and doesn't help or involve herself with packets.
I was told to ask the office for a copy of the aap packet by her as well. she was not helpful.


That's really disappointing to hear. I understand that she may not have time to meet with everyone, but she should have at least been the person to make sure you got the screening file. That is her job, and that is the person FCPS tells you to contact. I requested conferences with both my child's teacher and the AART after receiving the initial determination, and both talked to me on the phone (separately) for over 15 minutes. It was partially based on those conversations that I felt comfortable going forward with the appeal. If they had given me a sign that my child could not handle the program, I probably would not have pursued it. Oh, and the AART got the file ready for me in just a day or two. Sorry you did not get more support.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:appeal was denied. wisc 130. GAI was 134.

It's ridiculous that a child would qualify for Mensa, but not AAP. For cases like this, they should at least have to provide some sort of explanation, and not just be able to send a rejection form letter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:appeal was denied. wisc 130. GAI was 134.

It's ridiculous that a child would qualify for Mensa, but not AAP. For cases like this, they should at least have to provide some sort of explanation, and not just be able to send a rejection form letter.


Agree. I'm admittedly new to all this, but I'd say that unless your child has been getting very poor grades and/or had NNAT and CogAt scores that were way below the average, something seems very off.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Letter of acceptance received today. Our school's zipcode is 20120. Huge thank you to everyone who urged me to appeal because I was definitely on the fence about it.


Is your dc going to the Bull Run center? The principal had a lot of energy and enthusiasm at the open house tour.


We are debating it. We are very happy at our base school and may defer the decision for now.

To the PP who asked about the GBRS score, I don't know it, sorry.


NP-our neighbors stayed in VR in 20120 last year rather than go to the center-they said they valued the social benefits of the neighborhood school.


Thank you, that's good to hear! This whole thing is new to my husband--he thinks we should wait a year because dc is doing so well at the current school and dc is very happy and does not want to move right now, so I guess we will wait.

Do any experienced parents know if our child will automatically receive Level III services at the base school every year if we don't end up going to the center? I know it will happen next year if we defer, as the yellow form said so, but is that decided on an annual basis, or is it an automatic thing once the child qualifies for Level IV?
Anonymous
Appeal granted!

NNAT 124
Cogat 120
GBRS 11
WISC fsiq 129 (VCI 136)
Anonymous
No luck for us. We had the WISC of 120. Did not send it in just appealed with letter and work samples. So I guess we will try again next year. This is a fantastic learning experience though. It has made my DD more determined to succeed. Success is not always just getting into an AAP class, so I am excited to see where this lesson takes her.

Thank you all for wisdom in navigating these waters.
post reply Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: