Speaker of the House Vote Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this drags on into the weekend, I have to believe the Democrats will try and get with the moderate Republicans and put forward a consensus candidate.

Honestly, I think this government might function better if we do have a coalition government in the house

None of this is the responsibility of Dems. They will let the dumpster fire burn after years of “Dems in disarray” narratives. There’s few on the other side of the aisle who can be trusted, much less rein in the MAGAs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How long can they keep doing this? Can it go into next week? Weeks?

The longest it's taken historically is 2 months. But it goes until it's done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this drags on into the weekend, I have to believe the Democrats will try and get with the moderate Republicans and put forward a consensus candidate.

Honestly, I think this government might function better if we do have a coalition government in the house

why must the Ds always be the adults in the room?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this drags on into the weekend, I have to believe the Democrats will try and get with the moderate Republicans and put forward a consensus candidate.

Honestly, I think this government might function better if we do have a coalition government in the house

I don't think this happens until/unless the pro-McCarthy faction switches to another candidate like Scalise and that candidate also cannot get votes from the hold-outs. It may take a couple of these before it begins to dawn on them that no one will ever be acceptable to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this drags on into the weekend, I have to believe the Democrats will try and get with the moderate Republicans and put forward a consensus candidate.

Honestly, I think this government might function better if we do have a coalition government in the house

I don't think this happens until/unless the pro-McCarthy faction switches to another candidate like Scalise and that candidate also cannot get votes from the hold-outs. It may take a couple of these before it begins to dawn on them that no one will ever be acceptable to them.

Short of nominating one of their own, is there a way to appease them? I was thinking they just want a scalp, but if Scalise is also not acceptable, then that theory is out the door.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this drags on into the weekend, I have to believe the Democrats will try and get with the moderate Republicans and put forward a consensus candidate.

Honestly, I think this government might function better if we do have a coalition government in the house

I don't think this happens until/unless the pro-McCarthy faction switches to another candidate like Scalise and that candidate also cannot get votes from the hold-outs. It may take a couple of these before it begins to dawn on them that no one will ever be acceptable to them.

Short of nominating one of their own, is there a way to appease them? I was thinking they just want a scalp, but if Scalise is also not acceptable, then that theory is out the door.

Don't know and it appears the pro-McCarthy faction doesn't know either. It seems like McCarthy has agreed to every demand they've made and they are still voting against him. It's possible it's just a personality issue so Scalise or someone else may be able to break the logjam. But I've seen a number of the HFC saying they'll vote against Scalise too. Who knows. They're crazy and crazy doesn't make sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this drags on into the weekend, I have to believe the Democrats will try and get with the moderate Republicans and put forward a consensus candidate.

Honestly, I think this government might function better if we do have a coalition government in the house

I don't think this happens until/unless the pro-McCarthy faction switches to another candidate like Scalise and that candidate also cannot get votes from the hold-outs. It may take a couple of these before it begins to dawn on them that no one will ever be acceptable to them.

Short of nominating one of their own, is there a way to appease them? I was thinking they just want a scalp, but if Scalise is also not acceptable, then that theory is out the door.

Don't know and it appears the pro-McCarthy faction doesn't know either. It seems like McCarthy has agreed to every demand they've made and they are still voting against him. It's possible it's just a personality issue so Scalise or someone else may be able to break the logjam. But I've seen a number of the HFC saying they'll vote against Scalise too. Who knows. They're crazy and crazy doesn't make sense.

They don't trust McCarthy to follow through on any deal that he makes

[Anonymous]

They're going for the 9th ballot today.

[Anonymous]

It's after 3. Think they started drinking yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How quickly Trump has moved to irrelevance territory. He brokered a call between McCarthy and Perry, vss as lord his HFC moons to whip them gorcMcCarthy, and put out an endorsement on social media. Not a single vote moved.

Don't speak so soon. I expect Trump to be formally nominated soon and I expect him to win.

I'm not great at these predictions, so let's hope I'm wrong. But doing that completely wipes out any analysis of how embarrassing this is, etc. and gives a huge boost to the base. I think they are shooting it down behind closed doors, but if someone formally nominates him on the floor, watch out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How quickly Trump has moved to irrelevance territory. He brokered a call between McCarthy and Perry, vss as lord his HFC moons to whip them gorcMcCarthy, and put out an endorsement on social media. Not a single vote moved.

Don't speak so soon. I expect Trump to be formally nominated soon and I expect him to win.

I'm not great at these predictions, so let's hope I'm wrong. But doing that completely wipes out any analysis of how embarrassing this is, etc. and gives a huge boost to the base. I think they are shooting it down behind closed doors, but if someone formally nominates him on the floor, watch out.

I've gotta believe there are at least six republicans who wouldn't vote for him. Right? RIGHT??!!??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this drags on into the weekend, I have to believe the Democrats will try and get with the moderate Republicans and put forward a consensus candidate.

Honestly, I think this government might function better if we do have a coalition government in the house

[Anonymous]

This Rosendale dude is really weird.

[Anonymous]

The Democrats must be having fun watching the shoe on the other foot. The GOP can’t even win at winning.

[Anonymous]

This guy is odf