Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

But that's not pertinent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

But that's not pertinent.

Yes, it actually is. Because they shared with him the contents of the 302 that they wrote immediately after the interview. The one that is missing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

But that's not pertinent.

Yes, it actually is. Because they shared with him the contents of the 302 that they wrote immediately after the interview. The one that is missing.

It’s the basement of Comet Ping Pong, duh!

What are you nutballs even talking about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

But that's not pertinent.

Yes, it actually is. Because they shared with him the contents of the 302 that they wrote immediately after the interview. The one that is missing.

It’s the basement of Comet Ping Pong, duh!

What are you nutballs even talking about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

What he said doesn't matter?

He lied. He admitted he lied. If what he said didn't matter, then there would be no concerns from the IC monitoring Kislyak's phone and thus no need to request the unmasking. If this were a witch hunt, then let's hear the innocent conversation and judge for ourselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

But that's not pertinent.

Yes, it actually is. Because they shared with him the contents of the 302 that they wrote immediately after the interview. The one that is missing.

Have you considered that it is missing because it is damaging to Trump and Flynn and they are hiding it so people like you chase your tail with the flood of BS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

But that's not pertinent.

Yes, it actually is. Because they shared with him the contents of the 302 that they wrote immediately after the interview. The one that is missing.

No, their opinion of his truthfulness only speaks to his ability to lie convincingly. It doesn't mean he was truthful.

This isn't difficult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

But that's not pertinent.

Yes, it actually is. Because they shared with him the contents of the 302 that they wrote immediately after the interview. The one that is missing.

No, their opinion of his truthfulness only speaks to his ability to lie convincingly. It doesn't mean he was truthful.

This isn't difficult.

Then how did the prosecutor know that Flynn lied knowingly and willfully? The agents specifically noted the opposite.

[Anonymous]

Then how did the prosecutor know that Flynn lied knowingly and willfully? The agents specifically noted the opposite.

The prosecutor was working for Mueller. They were desperate to get some scalps.

1. The 302 is missing. It has been requested for quite some time. In addition to that, the agents take handwritten notes that are required to be preserved. Where are they?
2. A couple of days after Flynn's lawyers requested the original 302, it was leaked to the press that Mueller's team was going to prosecute Flynn's son.
3. A couple of days after that, Flynn pleaded guiltyl.
4. Emails between Flynn's first lawyers indicated that there was a "lawyer's agreement" that Flynn's son would not be prosecuted.
5. In the plea agreement, the prosecutor did not include the mention of the "lawyer's agreement." That is malpractice if it were true. And, evidence points to that.

And, the bottom line: the FBI agents had no cause to interview Flynn. This makes the whole thing bogus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

But that's not pertinent.

Yes, it actually is. Because they shared with him the contents of the 302 that they wrote immediately after the interview. The one that is missing.

No, their opinion of his truthfulness only speaks to his ability to lie convincingly. It doesn't mean he was truthful.

This isn't difficult.

Then how did the prosecutor know that Flynn lied knowingly and willfully? The agents specifically noted the opposite.

Because what he said in the interview was very different from what the transcript of the calls said.

That's why it was clear that he had lied to Pence, Priebus and Spicer, and the FBI.

[Anonymous]

Then how did the prosecutor know that Flynn lied knowingly and willfully? The agents specifically noted the opposite.


Because what he said in the interview was very different from what the transcript of the calls said.

That's why it was clear that he had lied to Pence, Priebus and Spicer, and the FBI.

You do know the agents had the transcript?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

But that's not pertinent.

Yes, it actually is. Because they shared with him the contents of the 302 that they wrote immediately after the interview. The one that is missing.

No, their opinion of his truthfulness only speaks to his ability to lie convincingly. It doesn't mean he was truthful.

This isn't difficult.

Then how did the prosecutor know that Flynn lied knowingly and willfully? The agents specifically noted the opposite.

Because what he said in the interview was very different from what the transcript of the calls said.

That's why it was clear that he had lied to Pence, Priebus and Spicer, and the FBI.

The agents knew what the transcripts said. If what he said in the interview was "very different", which the agents would have known at the time, why would they characterize the interview the way that they did?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just release the transcripts of the call. Then we can all hear what he said to the Russians.

What he said matters not at this point.
What did he say to the FBI agents is at question here. And, what did the FBI agents write in the 302. That is what is pertinent.
Because, Comey testified they thought he was being truthful.

But that's not pertinent.

Yes, it actually is. Because they shared with him the contents of the 302 that they wrote immediately after the interview. The one that is missing.

No, their opinion of his truthfulness only speaks to his ability to lie convincingly. It doesn't mean he was truthful.

This isn't difficult.

Then how did the prosecutor know that Flynn lied knowingly and willfully? The agents specifically noted the opposite.

Because what he said in the interview was very different from what the transcript of the calls said.

That's why it was clear that he had lied to Pence, Priebus and Spicer, and the FBI.

The agents knew what the transcripts said. If what he said in the interview was "very different", which the agents would have known at the time, why would they characterize the interview the way that they did?

Apparently he's very convincing...

He's convinced you and presumably you haven't even met him.

[Anonymous]

https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/05/16/undercover-huber-explains/

Kind of explains the character of the Mueller team.