Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How concerned is BK with the investigation? Does he stick with this?

As he yelled in his entitlement-fueled whine-fest yesterday, yes, he wants to extract every last bit of humiliation from these proceedings. He'll be dragged out kicking and screaming to make way for another nominee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's building permit was from 2008, not 2012, now verified by the local paper.

https://padailypost.com/2018/09/25/building-permit-shows-christine-blasey-ford-really-did-put-a-backdoor-on-her-bedroom/

This isn't what she was talking about. She testified to putting a second FRONT DOOR on the house in 2012. Different permit - might have even been a different house.

I think that's a great idea - put a point of entry for an attacker straight into your bedroom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happens now?

Trump signed the CR, so the government doesn't shut down tomorrow.

I meant about the SC nomination

[Anonymous]

Murkowski agrees with Flake re need for investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How concerned is BK with the investigation? Does he stick with this?

As he yelled in his entitlement-fueled whine-fest yesterday, yes, he wants to extract every last bit of humiliation from these proceedings. He'll be dragged out kicking and screaming to make way for another nominee.

Isn't there a URL already purchased to smear that new nominee as well? I think there is!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was a little scary that those women were able to harass Flake in an elevator. He didn’t sexually assault anyone. Where was security? They should seek therapy and protest through legal channels rather than harassing and cornering an innocent man in an elevator. Excuse me if I don’t think that these bullies were heroes. And BTW, I say this as a sexual assault victim.

Suuuure. You need to increase your dose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a feeling this investigation will bring us no closer to the truth here. The witnesses who have already denied this happening will do so again. Ford will reiterate that though she doesn’t remember much else, shes 100% sure BK was the one who assaulted her. It will still be down to credibility

But won't they question Mark Judge at that point?

I would think they need to question:

Mark Judge

All of the men and women listed on his calendar in 1982. (The Post reported that his GP classmates made a vow to not speak on the record about him.)

Whelan

Chris Garret - not only about that summer, but if he knew he was being framed

The people who wrote testimony about Ford

The friends who have made character statements on social media

And, on...

No one needs to be questioned. Ford says it was definitely him. That's the end of it.

I agree that she is credible (I believe her version entirely), however if there is an investigation it will only help her. Preferably the Republicans nominate someone else. It seems like it would be smart for them politically because they would get another conservative justice, but it would also stem the blue wave. I'd be happy with that. I'd wait for a blue wave to not have someone so despicable on the court.

Yes, an investigation would only help her. I'm sure you are correct. It's burned into her memory that it was Kavanaugh. We know that's always infallible.

FWIW, I am that PP. I was luring out someone like you. She was not credible. Her story was full of holes and she relied on scientific words to try to explain why she would never forget. Furthermore, when gently pushed through questioning, not only could she not answer most of them, she turned to her lawyers with a deer in headlights. She could not even remember which day she took the lie detector test, DESPITE THE FACT THERE WAS A NARROW WINDOW OF DAYS IN WHICH TO CHOOSE - TWO.

The only thing despicable here are the women on this forum, who gleefully attacked his wife's physical appearance and her marriage. I'm surprised none of you went after his daughters. Nothing surprises me anymore regarding the people in this area. Disgusting lot and I'm sure so many of you here are also federal employees to boot.

Then you should be glad there will be an investigation, and hope it will be thorough.

I do not know if her story was correct - but I think its dead certain he perjured himself on drinking to the point of loss of memory, on use of certain words, and on the Renate thing. Perjury itself should be disqualifying (recall Kav was on the Starr team). I think its more likely than not that her version is closer to the truth than his. I fear the FBI will need more than a week. Ken Starr, Benghazi, all took much longer.

[Anonymous]

How in the heck can you put a 7-day deadline on an FBI investigation? If during this time a crime is uncovered or a credible witness comes forward, the FBI is obligated to follow the investigation to the extent of wherever it leads no matter how long this requires.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Murkowski is on board, per NBC.

On board with what, PP?

She joined Flake in saying she wants the FBI Investigation.

Super. She wanted that, I recall.

An FBI investigation is the right course of action. But I wouldn't get too excited about the prospect of Flake/Colins/Murkowski voting no in the full Senate. I wouldn't be surprised if pushing for the FBI investigation ultimately gives them (in their minds) cover to vote yes. The more likely outcome if the Kavanaugh nomination is to be blocked is that he will withdraw (perhaps at the urging of the WH, and perhaps on his own initiative). But Kavanaugh seems disinclined to do this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a little scary that those women were able to harass Flake in an elevator. He didn’t sexually assault anyone. Where was security? They should seek therapy and protest through legal channels rather than harassing and cornering an innocent man in an elevator. Excuse me if I don’t think that these bullies were heroes. And BTW, I say this as a sexual assault victim.

They didn’t harass him!!! We still live in a world where we can speak to our elected officials!! Giving your opinion to an elected official is actually a part of the franchise of democracy!

So true!! Ask Ted Cruz and his wife.

They did not speak to him at a private restaurant. They went to his place of work at a senate office building which they and we all pay for.

In this case. Which is why you are keeping your field of vision narrowly attached to this particular incident.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's building permit was from 2008, not 2012, now verified by the local paper.

https://padailypost.com/2018/09/25/building-permit-shows-christine-blasey-ford-really-did-put-a-backdoor-on-her-bedroom/

This isn't what she was talking about. She testified to putting a second FRONT DOOR on the house in 2012. Different permit - might have even been a different house.

I think that's a great idea - put a point of entry for an attacker straight into your bedroom.

It is a 2nd means of egress obviously and she admitted it was to satisfy her ear and was not practical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a feeling this investigation will bring us no closer to the truth here. The witnesses who have already denied this happening will do so again. Ford will reiterate that though she doesn’t remember much else, shes 100% sure BK was the one who assaulted her. It will still be down to credibility

But won't they question Mark Judge at that point?

I would think they need to question:

Mark Judge

All of the men and women listed on his calendar in 1982. (The Post reported that his GP classmates made a vow to not speak on the record about him.)

Whelan

Chris Garret - not only about that summer, but if he knew he was being framed

The people who wrote testimony about Ford

The friends who have made character statements on social media

And, on...

No one needs to be questioned. Ford says it was definitely him. That's the end of it.

I agree that she is credible (I believe her version entirely), however if there is an investigation it will only help her. Preferably the Republicans nominate someone else. It seems like it would be smart for them politically because they would get another conservative justice, but it would also stem the blue wave. I'd be happy with that. I'd wait for a blue wave to not have someone so despicable on the court.

Yes, an investigation would only help her. I'm sure you are correct. It's burned into her memory that it was Kavanaugh. We know that's always infallible.

FWIW, I am that PP. I was luring out someone like you. She was not credible. Her story was full of holes and she relied on scientific words to try to explain why she would never forget. Furthermore, when gently pushed through questioning, not only could she not answer most of them, she turned to her lawyers with a deer in headlights. She could not even remember which day she took the lie detector test, DESPITE THE FACT THERE WAS A NARROW WINDOW OF DAYS IN WHICH TO CHOOSE - TWO.

The only thing despicable here are the women on this forum, who gleefully attacked his wife's physical appearance and her marriage. I'm surprised none of you went after his daughters. Nothing surprises me anymore regarding the people in this area. Disgusting lot and I'm sure so many of you here are also federal employees to boot.

I didn't know I was being "lured." You and I see the testimony differently. He was evasive and lied about minor things such as authoring his senior page, and what those entries meant.

FWIW, I never agree with attacking any woman's physical appearance and I don't think I've seen a lot of that here. I have posted on other threads on DCUM about how we should not focus on Ivanka's dress; I despise her, but not for what she wears or how she looks and it's a disservice to women everywhere to do that.

I'm also not a federal worker and have never been.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How concerned is BK with the investigation? Does he stick with this?

As he yelled in his entitlement-fueled whine-fest yesterday, yes, he wants to extract every last bit of humiliation from these proceedings. He'll be dragged out kicking and screaming to make way for another nominee.

Isn't there a URL already purchased to smear that new nominee as well? I think there is!

I don't know, but no elected Democrat would support it. It's not in their best interests, since they must appear to be above such petty maneuvers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's building permit was from 2008, not 2012, now verified by the local paper.

https://padailypost.com/2018/09/25/building-permit-shows-christine-blasey-ford-really-did-put-a-backdoor-on-her-bedroom/

This isn't what she was talking about. She testified to putting a second FRONT DOOR on the house in 2012. Different permit - might have even been a different house.

I think that's a great idea - put a point of entry for an attacker straight into your bedroom.

It is a 2nd means of egress obviously and she admitted it was to satisfy her ear and was not practical.

Her fear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How concerned is BK with the investigation? Does he stick with this?

As he yelled in his entitlement-fueled whine-fest yesterday, yes, he wants to extract every last bit of humiliation from these proceedings. He'll be dragged out kicking and screaming to make way for another nominee.

In all seriousness, I hope for his health and for his family that he pulls his name. If there’s an FBI inquiry, a follow-up to the 7-1-82 calendar entry is likely to be devastating.