Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry needs a divorce lawyer, stat! His wife is a succubus.

I predict they will be divorced before too long.

She will have gained and he will have lost. No amount of Palace PR could restore his reputation to what it once was. Fake and baseless as it was, it appealed to people and they bought it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rumour has it Archie is with Jessica Mulroney. WTH is going on?

People Magazine reported it:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B7G8MH8JkGI/?hl=en


WTH? They clearly weren’t planning on staying in U.K. long.

OMG they left Archie with Jessica Mulroney? How long are they leaving him with her? Meghan must be so desperate to see him. Why didn’t they bring him with them back to U.K.?

No, nobody desperate to see their 8 month old leaves him in a different country with strangers (to him) for a week just so they can pop home for a bit to make an announcement. She doesn't seem to be very maternal and clearly sees the royal life as completely transactional (hence the negotiating, trademarking, branding, etc.) so it's not surprising that she left her kid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rumour has it Archie is with Jessica Mulroney. WTH is going on?

People Magazine reported it:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B7G8MH8JkGI/?hl=en


WTH? They clearly weren’t planning on staying in U.K. long.

This has mentioned by me twice already in this thread. People keep skipping over it. To me, it’s huge and says they aren’t discussing anything, merely informing.

I think Meghan and Harry expected the Queen and Prince Charles to roll over and cave to their demands (like they ALWAYS DO). The Firm has bent over backwards to give them everything they’ve asked for. Why should this latest plan be anything different? They underestimated the public backlash for disrespecting the Queen.

[Anonymous]

Has anyone mentioned post partum depression. I see it with my clients all the time. She seems off since giving birth.

[Anonymous]

Wow I can’t believe she left her baby to go back to U.K.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blind Gossip has an article portraying Meghan as a snake, monetizing her celebrity and royal status - it’s been planned for months and it’s all about money.

I always liked her, and him too - and I respected their need to get away from it all over the holidays and retreat from the public view. But now I’m seeing her in a different light - she has completely alienated him from his own family, and he can no longer think for himself. Blindsiding his family is a betrayal, and completely damaging and disrespectful.

In my view, they should abdicate their titles and live as private citizens. They shouldn’t be able to capitalize on their royal status while abdicating their role in such a negligent way.

She didn't alienate him from his family unless you think he has the IQ of a tomato. He is an adult with a brain who makes his own decisions. Stop scapegoating her for a decision they both made.

seriously. it’s like people blaming the mistress for the cheating husband. Harry owes his family much more than Meghan does. if you won’t to blame someone blame him.

Exactly. Harry is what 35? He's not a child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone mentioned post partum depression. I see it with my clients all the time. She seems off since giving birth.

She certainly doesn’t come across as maternal. I wouldn’t have flown 5,000 miles from my 8 month old under any circumstance. She seems to prefer Harry hold him, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone mentioned post partum depression. I see it with my clients all the time. She seems off since giving birth.

I doubt Harry has PPD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blind Gossip has an article portraying Meghan as a snake, monetizing her celebrity and royal status - it’s been planned for months and it’s all about money.

I always liked her, and him too - and I respected their need to get away from it all over the holidays and retreat from the public view. But now I’m seeing her in a different light - she has completely alienated him from his own family, and he can no longer think for himself. Blindsiding his family is a betrayal, and completely damaging and disrespectful.

In my view, they should abdicate their titles and live as private citizens. They shouldn’t be able to capitalize on their royal status while abdicating their role in such a negligent way.

That Blind Gossip article and your “analysis” of it seems to make their case for them.
Good for them to get the F out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rumour has it Archie is with Jessica Mulroney. WTH is going on?

People Magazine reported it:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B7G8MH8JkGI/?hl=en


WTH? They clearly weren’t planning on staying in U.K. long.

To all the pearl-clutchers: didn’t the Cambridges leave an infant George with the Middletons while they went off on a Caribbean vacation? It’s not like Archie was dumped on the doorstep of an orphanage.

[Anonymous]

Re: Archie in Canada

I wonder if Meghan and Harry were worried that the Queen demand that Archie remain in U.K.? She has legal custody of those minors in direct line for throne, right?

Harry and Meghan using Archie as leverage?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rumour has it Archie is with Jessica Mulroney. WTH is going on?

People Magazine reported it:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B7G8MH8JkGI/?hl=en


WTH? They clearly weren’t planning on staying in U.K. long.

OMG they left Archie with Jessica Mulroney? How long are they leaving him with her? Meghan must be so desperate to see him. Why didn’t they bring him with them back to U.K.?

No, nobody desperate to see their 8 month old leaves him in a different country with strangers (to him) for a week just so they can pop home for a bit to make an announcement. She doesn't seem to be very maternal and clearly sees the royal life as completely transactional (hence the negotiating, trademarking, branding, etc.) so it's not surprising that she left her kid.

Do the tabloids pay you people to spread ridiculous speculation, or are you just stupid enough to believe the kind of $h!t they print?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rumour has it Archie is with Jessica Mulroney. WTH is going on?

People Magazine reported it:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B7G8MH8JkGI/?hl=en


WTH? They clearly weren’t planning on staying in U.K. long.

To all the pearl-clutchers: didn’t the Cambridges leave an infant George with the Middletons while they went off on a Caribbean vacation? It’s not like Archie was dumped on the doorstep of an orphanage.

They aren’t on vacation. They are ostensibly at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rumour has it Archie is with Jessica Mulroney. WTH is going on?

People Magazine reported it:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B7G8MH8JkGI/?hl=en


WTH? They clearly weren’t planning on staying in U.K. long.

This has mentioned by me twice already in this thread. People keep skipping over it. To me, it’s huge and says they aren’t discussing anything, merely informing.

I think Meghan and Harry expected the Queen and Prince Charles to roll over and cave to their demands (like they ALWAYS DO). The Firm has bent over backwards to give them everything they’ve asked for. Why should this latest plan be anything different? They underestimated the public backlash for disrespecting the Queen.

I think the Windsors have underestimated the public backlash against them IMO. This is the trending topic in Arabic, Spanish, French, and English globally with more than 80% of the pieces sympathetic to the Sussexes.

Honestly, I don't think they've 'bent over backwards'.

They gave them the same wedding they gave Eugenie. Which means it was standard far for a royal.

They gave them a tiny 4-bedroom house when all the Queen's children are living in massive 20-bedroom castles and Will+Kate have 12-bedrooms between their two homes.

They sent them on tours which is good - but that's also work and Meghan was expected to be the most photographed woman in the royal family without the benefit of a permanent hairdresser/makeup artist or personal dresser. Both of which Camilla and Kate have.

The basically gave the Sussexes what was required nothing more when Meghan/Harry are the stars and crowd-drawers of that family whether they like it or not.

Beyond that, they didn't utilize Meghan at all. She gives brilliant speeches, talks, and can host forums. She could have easily been sent to do UN Women talks with Sophie, had some appearances at refugee camps with WHO (as she's done in her past), and opened up diverse media conversations on network talks.

Instead they shamed her and asked her to be quiet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone mentioned post partum depression. I see it with my clients all the time. She seems off since giving birth.

She certainly doesn’t come across as maternal. I wouldn’t have flown 5,000 miles from my 8 month old under any circumstance. She seems to prefer Harry hold him, too.

You have no idea who she prefers hold him. And while I still haven’t left my toddler to go overseas I don’t think that really means anything either. A number of moms in my mom group did that the first year so they could travel and reconnect with the hubs or travel for work. One of the best moms I know went to Australia when her DS was this age for work. Cool it with the mom shaming. It’s quite striking that somehow it’s only a problem that one of Archie’s parents left him in canada.