Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No plan B.

Judge Barrett is waiting in the wings, bro.

Non-starter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/far-left-cartoonist-accused-of-targeting-kavanaughs-10-year-old-daughter-in-vicious-cartoon

Cartonnist targeting Kavanaugh's 10-year old.

This needs to stop. Take a vote and move on.

She' not being targeted, there is NOTHING negative about the child in that cartoon

You’ve been brainwashed. Children should be off limits.

Children should be off limits, which includes being misleading about how children are depicted in cartoons. The child was not targeted and you are attempting to exploit the child to generate outrage. You should be ashamed of yourself.

I think about this.... when his girls get a little older and google information about themselves, this will certainly be returned in the search results.
It is horrible.

The child IS being targeted. She is being used by the cartoonist putting words in her mouth that suggest she believes those awful things are true about her own father. I don't know how anyone could attempt to justify that hideous behavior. Imagine how she'll feel the day she sees that. It won't be as far off as when she's old enough to find it on her own. How long will it be before it is shown to her by a classmate taunting her with it? It will be used in a second way to target her.

So Brett should have never publicly talked about her prayers. He introduced the topic and the cartoonist ran worth it. Both of them were wrong.

I cannot believe you said this. I cannot believe that you are rationalizing what this person did because of Kavanaugh’s testimony.
I just am astounded daily at the thought process of a liberal.

Consider your own thought process:

Exploiting a child to generate sympathy in a public hearing == good;
Exploiting a child in a cartoon == bad;
Exploiting a child to generate anger on DCUM == good.

Your rules are complicated. Liberals can be forgiven for being confused.

I don't know how you can make it sound different but equal to "exploit" your child by sharing something sweet and endearing that they said to show how false accusations have affected your family and to "exploit a child" by putting horrible and vile words in her mouth to entertain people who hate her father.

And no, I will not forgive liberals for not understanding the difference. It's shameful, unsurprising and unforgivable.

They were both using the daughter for their own gain. Sad you can’t see that. And very telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No plan B.

Judge Barrett is waiting in the wings, bro.

judge barrett will savage reproductive rights but at least she'll do it out of conviction and not machismo and misogyny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Ford claims to remember she did not take any medications the day of the alleged attack 36 years ago
Ford claims to have had precisely ONE beer the day of the alleged attack

BUT
Ford cannot remember day/month/year/house/inviter/drive home/talking to best friend she left behind/etc...


Big Gaps in credibility here....

Yes, sleuth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No plan B.

Judge Barrett is waiting in the wings, bro.

Nope. No Plan B.

The bloom is off the rose. But the midterms are at hand. There will be no one else.

[Anonymous]

I loathe Trump so I hate suggesting something that is helpful to him, but he would benefit by dismissing Kavanaugh. He could easily announce that the circus around Kavanaugh’s nomination has distracted Americans from more important things like his shiny new trade deal and he wants to be done with the distraction. He could throw in a few zingers about how ineffectual the Senate has proven itself, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No plan B.

Judge Barrett is waiting in the wings, bro.

She was a Kennedy addition. The Federalist Society might not be onboard. She was not on its list that Trump campaigned on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
We all agree the cartoon, while not directly critical of the child, was in bad taste and does not reflect the views of most people.

And for anyone wondering about the kids at Senate hearings, it's relatively frequent. My neighbor was told to bring his family to his hearing - cute wholesome family would make him look good, blah blah blah...

Personally, I tend to be OK with using children to paint a positive image, and never OK with using children to paint a negative image.

I find this nominee and his supporters offensive.
But this is a distraction. Move on.

You would think that we could all agree that it was in bad taste, but no, we don't. And the fact that it does reflect the views of quite a few on DCUM tells you something about the folks here. Such extreme liberalism, well outside the range of normal viewpoints.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No plan B.

Judge Barrett is waiting in the wings, bro.

Got to go to D&C then.

[Anonymous]

Swetnick's boyfriend of 7 years delivered a scary profile of Swetnick's emotional, psychological challenges...history of false accusations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No plan B.

Judge Barrett is waiting in the wings, bro.

Nope. No Plan B.

The bloom is off the rose. But the midterms are at hand. There will be no one else.

The rose has been decomposing and is starting to smell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Go fund me for “Bart” now near 430k. That’s ok money even by dcum standards!

SO GROSS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Swetnick's boyfriend of 7 years delivered a scary profile of Swetnick's emotional, psychological challenges...history of false accusations

You mean the guy who sued her and was thrown out of court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No plan B.

Judge Barrett is waiting in the wings, bro.

She was a Kennedy addition. The Federalist Society might not be onboard. She was not on its list that Trump campaigned on.

The evangelicals hate her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No plan B.

Judge Barrett is waiting in the wings, bro.

judge barrett will savage reproductive rights but at least she'll do it out of conviction and not machismo and misogyny.

You have a point. Almost makes me want to support her. Naaaaah.