The Mueller Report

[Anonymous]

Mueller won’t testify under oath. Why?

[Anonymous]

Mueller does not intend to engage with Congress.

[Anonymous]

Mueller basically called Barr a huge liar.

[Anonymous]

“Everything is in the report.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing you people didn't understand what Mueller said.

1) DOJ guidelines prevent Mueller charging a crime to a sitting president

2) The president is not exonerated

3) Our country was attacked

4) the obstruction was material to the investigation

5) This is now in the hands of the Congress

I understood it. He’s making a case for impeachment. No worries. We have the goods on Mueller. Barr got him re: Bulger and will get him again

Why are you not familiar with this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Mueller does not intend to engage with Congress.

Really?

[Anonymous]

You cannot indict a sitting president.

That's the long and short of it.

[Anonymous]

Barr’s pick of Durham:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-15/barrs-investigator-john-durham-once-probed-mueller-shocking-case

[Anonymous]

Bob Mueller:

First, don’t say it’s an exoneration, because we would have cleared the President if we could.

Second, it is not for the criminal justice system, but for Congress to accuse a sitting President of wrongdoing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over on Fox, Bret Baier calls Mueller's statement "striking" and notes it was "not anywhere clear cut" as AG Bill Barr initially characterized it.

"In fact, it was almost the opposite," Baier said.

Shocked, shocked that Barr’s initial characterization was totally wrong.

It would've been nice if Mueller had spoken sooner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Robert Mueller: "As set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."


This cannot be repeated enough.

Were Trump supporters here watching something different?

And yet, this is still different from, "We found the President committed a crime, but we cannot charge him."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing you people didn't understand what Mueller said.

1) DOJ guidelines prevent Mueller charging a crime to a sitting president

2) The president is not exonerated

3) Our country was attacked

4) the obstruction was material to the investigation

5) This is now in the hands of the Congress

I understood it. He’s making a case for impeachment. No worries. We have the goods on Mueller. Barr got him re: Bulger and will get him again

Why are you not familiar with this?

Why do you keep bringing it up when it has nothing to do with the President's crimes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Robert Mueller: "As set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."


This cannot be repeated enough.

Were Trump supporters here watching something different?

And yet, this is still different from, "We found the President committed a crime, but we cannot charge him."

What you posted is basically what Mueller said. He is leaving it to the Congress because it is their job.

[Anonymous]

This was a waste of taxperyers' money.

what? They didn't know the rules before they played the game?

Watergate, anyone?

for the past two years - Push play. And guess what? Nothing was playing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Barr’s pick of Durham:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-15/barrs-investigator-john-durham-once-probed-mueller-shocking-case

Zerohedge, we're almost Breitbart.