What happens to Kamala’s momentum now the DNC is over?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, after the full weight of the media and Hollywood have been brought to bear she’s essentially where Biden was before he had his senior moment. She’s hit her ceiling and her staff is desperately trying to keep her away from any microphone that would require her to explain how a 60 year old person could go from a Bernie Sanders progressive to a pro-choice Bush moderate in just six weeks.

Literally none of what you just wrote is true. Stop getting all of your info from Facebook posts.

Kamala has gained over Biden or even flipped the polling in every swing state and gained several points nationally.

June polling:

AZ: Biden 38% Trump 40%

GA: Biden 39% Trump 44%

MI: Biden 36% Trump 37%

NC: Biden 40% Trump 43%

PA: Biden 42% Trump 44%

Nationally: Biden 45% Trump 46%

Current polling:

AZ: Harris 48% Trump 48%

GA: Harris 47% Trump 48%

MI: Harris 48% Trump 45%

NC: Harris 47% Trump 47%

PA: Harris 48% Trump 46%

Nationally: Harris 48% Trump 45%

And she was absolutely never a "Bernie Sanders Progressive." That's utter nonsense. Wasn't it just a few months ago Republicans were calling her a "cop?" And she was literally always pro-choice. Good lord, it's sad that people as ignorant as you get the same vote as people who actually pay attention and don't have a brain filled with borscht.

DP Showing Biden behind in the polls was just one of the tools they used to get him to step aside. Biden was ahead in the Teamsters poll when he was still in the race, Harris was not. That tells you their relative strength in swing states.

Wrong! The "they" you are referring to are the wealthy and powerful people running the show at the DNC. They were perfectly happy with Biden as the nominee as long as he had a good chance of winning because him remaining on the ticket and in The White House preserves status quo and status quo has them in a wealthy and powerful position. "They" started pressuring Biden to get the heck out of the way once the American people as a whole discovered and acknowledged Biden's unfitness. The American people acted first and then the "they" reacted.

"They" set Biden up in an early debate to begin the process of getting him to step aside pre-convention.

The American people were probably going to choose Trump over Biden and that is why "they" did whatever "they" did. "They" didn't fabricate the fact that Biden is unpopular and unfit to serve four more years. Thank god Biden is removed from the situation and we now have a legitimate candidate that can beat Trump.

We have a candidate. Legitimate candidates are determined through a primary process.

She was on the primary ticket.Sshe didn't force him out, he stepped aside.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her latest comment on the Oprah Winfrey show, about how she will just “blow people away” in her house, make me wonder if she is some NRA plant or something.

+1

She is encouraging vigilantism.

It isn't vigilantism to defend your property, particularly house intrusion.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her latest comment on the Oprah Winfrey show, about how she will just “blow people away” in her house, make me wonder if she is some NRA plant or something.

+1

She is encouraging vigilantism.

It isn't vigilantism to defend your property, particularly house intrusion.

Idiots are going to idiot. Pay them no attention.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, after the full weight of the media and Hollywood have been brought to bear she’s essentially where Biden was before he had his senior moment. She’s hit her ceiling and her staff is desperately trying to keep her away from any microphone that would require her to explain how a 60 year old person could go from a Bernie Sanders progressive to a pro-choice Bush moderate in just six weeks.

Literally none of what you just wrote is true. Stop getting all of your info from Facebook posts.

Kamala has gained over Biden or even flipped the polling in every swing state and gained several points nationally.

June polling:

AZ: Biden 38% Trump 40%

GA: Biden 39% Trump 44%

MI: Biden 36% Trump 37%

NC: Biden 40% Trump 43%

PA: Biden 42% Trump 44%

Nationally: Biden 45% Trump 46%

Current polling:

AZ: Harris 48% Trump 48%

GA: Harris 47% Trump 48%

MI: Harris 48% Trump 45%

NC: Harris 47% Trump 47%

PA: Harris 48% Trump 46%

Nationally: Harris 48% Trump 45%

And she was absolutely never a "Bernie Sanders Progressive." That's utter nonsense. Wasn't it just a few months ago Republicans were calling her a "cop?" And she was literally always pro-choice. Good lord, it's sad that people as ignorant as you get the same vote as people who actually pay attention and don't have a brain filled with borscht.

DP Showing Biden behind in the polls was just one of the tools they used to get him to step aside. Biden was ahead in the Teamsters poll when he was still in the race, Harris was not. That tells you their relative strength in swing states.

Wrong! The "they" you are referring to are the wealthy and powerful people running the show at the DNC. They were perfectly happy with Biden as the nominee as long as he had a good chance of winning because him remaining on the ticket and in The White House preserves status quo and status quo has them in a wealthy and powerful position. "They" started pressuring Biden to get the heck out of the way once the American people as a whole discovered and acknowledged Biden's unfitness. The American people acted first and then the "they" reacted.

So, you are upset about the wealthy and powerful people running the show at the DNC.

How about the folks behind the Republicans? Donald Trump, self-proclaimed millionaire installed his daughter-in-law, Laura Trump as head of the RNC. Trump is backed by Elon Musk, the richest man in the world. Trump's VP candidate, JD Vance, is backed by billionair Peter Thiel.

In fact 26 billionaires have poured over $162M into the Trump campaign via PACS and committees.

Why? Because they love Trump. He gives to the rich and steals from the poor. He cuts the wealthy billionaires and their corporations millions of dollars in tax cuts, helps to increase the wealth gap between the top 0.1% and the rest of the 99.9%. His tax cuts during his first term added over $8T to the national debt (the highest singled 4-year term debt increase in history) and he made their tax cuts permanent. The paltry $400 tax cut that went to regular Americans expires in 2025. He is a gift to the wealthy.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/leokamin/2024/08/14/here-are-trumps-top-billionaire-donors/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

And these are people who would know first hand the damage DonOLD was doing.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Just because the GOP would tank the economy so badly that we’d be in a tailspin for a decade or two these fair weather friends go running to the lady with the plans. How dare they. There are SHARKS to be worried about. And BATTERIES. These problems won’t sort themselves out if businesses and billionaires have to do things like pay taxes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Has anyone alerted our regressive friends on this board? They seem especially anxious to listen to [their preferred propaganda outlet to give them the spin and their talking points on] her comments.

[Anonymous]

Oh NOW she's going to go to the border.

This is good. This is rich.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Has anyone alerted our regressive friends on this board? They seem especially anxious to listen to [their preferred propaganda outlet to give them the spin and their talking points on] her comments.

Yes. The “she won’t talk to the press” talking points seem to have lost steam. Now they are hammering the “she doesn’t represent change” talking point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Has anyone alerted our regressive friends on this board? They seem especially anxious to listen to [their preferred propaganda outlet to give them the spin and their talking points on] her comments.

Yes. The “she won’t talk to the press” talking points seem to have lost steam. Now they are hammering the “she doesn’t represent change” talking point.

She's definitely not an A-list presidential candidate. Anyone with at least half a brain will tell you that. That being said; she sure does make a lot more sense as POTUS until 2029 than 77 year old bat poop crazy Trump. I think we can all agree on that.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]