LCPS sexual assualt - who is held accountable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Shades of Buffalo Bill right there.

Looks like a fetish to me. I wouldn't be surprised is he consumed a lot of porn starting at a young age given his history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Yikes. There's so much to unpack there. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

This is clearly a very troubled boy with a history of behavior issues. When he was 11 years old he sent nude photos of himself to a girl in fifth grade. The police got involved but the girl's parents decided not to pursue charges as long as he was kept away from their daughter.

And started having sex at 13. “ Accidentally” had anal sex with the Stone Bridge victim. I guarantee that kid has been watching p@rn online for years.

The girl was troubled as well.

So she deserves to be raped? What in the hell is wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Yikes. There's so much to unpack there. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

This is clearly a very troubled boy with a history of behavior issues. When he was 11 years old he sent nude photos of himself to a girl in fifth grade. The police got involved but the girl's parents decided not to pursue charges as long as he was kept away from their daughter.

And started having sex at 13. “ Accidentally” had anal sex with the Stone Bridge victim. I guarantee that kid has been watching p@rn online for years.

The girl was troubled as well.

So she deserves to be raped? What in the hell is wrong with you?

No but she is exhibiting some troubling behavior. Having sex in the bathroom, meeting a boy in the bathroom you go to for sex when she supposedly didn’t want sex, and even being attracted to a guy who dresses like someone in the photo. I’d say she needed some type of therapy even before the rape.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Yikes. There's so much to unpack there. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

This is clearly a very troubled boy with a history of behavior issues. When he was 11 years old he sent nude photos of himself to a girl in fifth grade. The police got involved but the girl's parents decided not to pursue charges as long as he was kept away from their daughter.

And started having sex at 13. “ Accidentally” had anal sex with the Stone Bridge victim. I guarantee that kid has been watching p@rn online for years.

The girl was troubled as well.

So she deserves to be raped? What in the hell is wrong with you?

No but she is exhibiting some troubling behavior. Having sex in the bathroom, meeting a boy in the bathroom you go to for sex when she supposedly didn’t want sex, and even being attracted to a guy who dresses like someone in the photo. I’d say she needed some type of therapy even before the rape.

That may be true. Doesn’t change the fact that she was raped.

[Anonymous]

No but she is exhibiting some troubling behavior. Having sex in the bathroom, meeting a boy in the bathroom you go to for sex when she supposedly didn’t want sex, and even being attracted to a guy who dresses like someone in the photo. I’d say she needed some type of therapy even before the rape.

Blame the victim?

Maybe, this is why parents do not want sexually explicit books available to kids. Not saying it is not available readily on the internet, but we sure don't need to provide it in the schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Yikes. There's so much to unpack there. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

This is clearly a very troubled boy with a history of behavior issues. When he was 11 years old he sent nude photos of himself to a girl in fifth grade. The police got involved but the girl's parents decided not to pursue charges as long as he was kept away from their daughter.

And started having sex at 13. “ Accidentally” had anal sex with the Stone Bridge victim. I guarantee that kid has been watching p@rn online for years.

The girl was troubled as well.

So she deserves to be raped? What in the hell is wrong with you?

No but she is exhibiting some troubling behavior. Having sex in the bathroom, meeting a boy in the bathroom you go to for sex when she supposedly didn’t want sex, and even being attracted to a guy who dresses like someone in the photo. I’d say she needed some type of therapy even before the rape.

That may be true. Doesn’t change the fact that she was raped.

If she was raped, yes. This case was sort of tried in the media. And according the mom, sounds like the rape was due to the young man going in the wrong hole for a few seconds during a consensual sexual encounter. If that’s true most guys will tell you it’s possible in a situation where you can’t see and women have had the same experience. If that’s the case, I wouldn’t call it rape.

No women deserves to be raped. I wasn’t there so I truly wouldn’t know, but this story just doesn’t sit well from the information I’ve received.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Shades of Buffalo Bill right there.

Looks like a fetish to me. I wouldn't be surprised is he consumed a lot of porn starting at a young age given his history.

Wow. Looks trans to me. I would have assumed he was trans if he tried using ladies room

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Shades of Buffalo Bill right there.

Looks like a fetish to me. I wouldn't be surprised is he consumed a lot of porn starting at a young age given his history.

Wow. Looks trans to me. I would have assumed he was trans if he tried using ladies room

Looks like he falls somewhere underneath the trans umbrella which includes identities like non-binary and gender fluid. No cisgender male would wear rainbow socks, a skirt and a “kitten” choker posed next to rainbow flags unless they somehow belonged into the group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

No but she is exhibiting some troubling behavior. Having sex in the bathroom, meeting a boy in the bathroom you go to for sex when she supposedly didn’t want sex, and even being attracted to a guy who dresses like someone in the photo. I’d say she needed some type of therapy even before the rape.

Blame the victim?

Maybe, this is why parents do not want sexually explicit books available to kids. Not saying it is not available readily on the internet, but we sure don't need to provide it in the schools.

It is a huge HUGE stretch to claim teenagers’ sexual behavior is because of the books they might read in school. Like. That makes no damn sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Yikes. There's so much to unpack there. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

This is clearly a very troubled boy with a history of behavior issues. When he was 11 years old he sent nude photos of himself to a girl in fifth grade. The police got involved but the girl's parents decided not to pursue charges as long as he was kept away from their daughter.

And started having sex at 13. “ Accidentally” had anal sex with the Stone Bridge victim. I guarantee that kid has been watching p@rn online for years.

The girl was troubled as well.

That's one reason why schools shouldn't put gasoline anywhere near fire.

Confused by your metaphor . What exactly was the gasoline?

Giving a teenage boy with a long history of sexually inappropriate behavior access to troubled girls in the school setting is a recipe for disaster. He should have been in a much more restrictive placement. In this situation gasoline= access to vulnerable students.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Yikes. There's so much to unpack there. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

This is clearly a very troubled boy with a history of behavior issues. When he was 11 years old he sent nude photos of himself to a girl in fifth grade. The police got involved but the girl's parents decided not to pursue charges as long as he was kept away from their daughter.

And started having sex at 13. “ Accidentally” had anal sex with the Stone Bridge victim. I guarantee that kid has been watching p@rn online for years.

The girl was troubled as well.

That's one reason why schools shouldn't put gasoline anywhere near fire.

Confused by your metaphor . What exactly was the gasoline?

Giving a teenage boy with a long history of sexually inappropriate behavior access to troubled girls in the school setting is a recipe for disaster. He should have been in a much more restrictive placement. In this situation gasoline= access to vulnerable students.

By your definition, the existence of school generally is just a problem. All kids are vulnerable because they’re kids. Many are troubled. Many have issues going on at home. Many have personal stressors and difficulties. In your comparison, basically no kids should ever be put into large groups with each other where they outnumber supervising adults. But that … is… school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Shades of Buffalo Bill right there.

Looks like a fetish to me. I wouldn't be surprised is he consumed a lot of porn starting at a young age given his history.

Wow. Looks trans to me. I would have assumed he was trans if he tried using ladies room

Looks like he falls somewhere underneath the trans umbrella which includes identities like non-binary and gender fluid. No cisgender male would wear rainbow socks, a skirt and a “kitten” choker posed next to rainbow flags unless they somehow belonged into the group.

With current policies in place, no one would stop him from going into the girls bathroom at school. He has as much right to be there as anyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Yeah no Jeff I'm not falling for your "where is it in the citation game." Because, as anyone who actually follows history, law and politics knows., there's a lot more to the situation than word-for-word citations. When I introduce other areas of extrinsic knowledge you just discount or debate them, or say "it's not in the citation so it's not relevant."

We're not arguing about the words in the Garland letter. We're arguing about the context.

TLDR, you can't support anything you say but we should just believe it because you use big words.

The content of Garland's memo is that threats and intimidation of elected officials is not acceptable and the FBI will meet with local law enforcement to coordinate a response. Sadly, you are siding with those making the threats.

All I have to say is, I hope you reflect on this when Youngkin wins on Tuesday. The day cannot come quickly enough for Democrats to grow up and realize they need to stop chasing social media trends and figure out what voters want and understand the blow-back of decayed 1st Amendment rights.

That POS probably will win.

He might but I just want to point out the PP should say that Democrats should figure out what white* voters want. GOP is great at making white people feel victimized and persecuted which is why their messaging does so well with white people.

They want supremacy. That’s what they are voting for with Youngkin

Well, as an Asian, I can tell you I voted R because of the slide towards socialism and far left policies. Please come back to middle left before its too late.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:With current policies in place, no one would stop him from going into the girls bathroom at school. He has as much right to be there as anyone else.

He and the victim met in bathrooms multiple times before the current policy was approved. The current policy is irrelevant to this assault.

[Anonymous]

Too answer OP's original question - Terry McAuliffe.