LCPS sexual assualt - who is held accountable?

[Anonymous]

The mom needs to stop talking immediately. But also, the VA DOE and individual school districts need to stop acting like students with these kinds of behaviors can be served in a general education setting or even a smaller program within a general education setting. They can't, and pretending otherwise is terribly unfair to everyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The mom needs to stop talking immediately. But also, the VA DOE and individual school districts need to stop acting like students with these kinds of behaviors can be served in a general education setting or even a smaller program within a general education setting. They can't, and pretending otherwise is terribly unfair to everyone.

Agree but there’s so much wheel-spinning as incidents are investigated. It’s maddening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

This story is very confusing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Yikes. There's so much to unpack there. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

This is clearly a very troubled boy with a history of behavior issues. When he was 11 years old he sent nude photos of himself to a girl in fifth grade. The police got involved but the girl's parents decided not to pursue charges as long as he was kept away from their daughter.

And started having sex at 13. “ Accidentally” had anal sex with the Stone Bridge victim. I guarantee that kid has been watching p@rn online for years.

The girl was troubled as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Yeah no Jeff I'm not falling for your "where is it in the citation game." Because, as anyone who actually follows history, law and politics knows., there's a lot more to the situation than word-for-word citations. When I introduce other areas of extrinsic knowledge you just discount or debate them, or say "it's not in the citation so it's not relevant."

We're not arguing about the words in the Garland letter. We're arguing about the context.

TLDR, you can't support anything you say but we should just believe it because you use big words.

The content of Garland's memo is that threats and intimidation of elected officials is not acceptable and the FBI will meet with local law enforcement to coordinate a response. Sadly, you are siding with those making the threats.

All I have to say is, I hope you reflect on this when Youngkin wins on Tuesday. The day cannot come quickly enough for Democrats to grow up and realize they need to stop chasing social media trends and figure out what voters want and understand the blow-back of decayed 1st Amendment rights.

That POS probably will win.

He might but I just want to point out the PP should say that Democrats should figure out what white* voters want. GOP is great at making white people feel victimized and persecuted which is why their messaging does so well with white people.

They want supremacy. That’s what they are voting for with Youngkin

[Anonymous]

After tonight's election results, when are LCPS board resignations coming? And Ziegler?

With Miyares winning, there will be a criminal investigation into them. I'm sure more is going to come out now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:After tonight's election results, when are LCPS board resignations coming? And Ziegler?

With Miyares winning, there will be a criminal investigation into them. I'm sure more is going to come out now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Shades of Buffalo Bill right there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Yeah no Jeff I'm not falling for your "where is it in the citation game." Because, as anyone who actually follows history, law and politics knows., there's a lot more to the situation than word-for-word citations. When I introduce other areas of extrinsic knowledge you just discount or debate them, or say "it's not in the citation so it's not relevant."

We're not arguing about the words in the Garland letter. We're arguing about the context.

TLDR, you can't support anything you say but we should just believe it because you use big words.

The content of Garland's memo is that threats and intimidation of elected officials is not acceptable and the FBI will meet with local law enforcement to coordinate a response. Sadly, you are siding with those making the threats.

All I have to say is, I hope you reflect on this when Youngkin wins on Tuesday. The day cannot come quickly enough for Democrats to grow up and realize they need to stop chasing social media trends and figure out what voters want and understand the blow-back of decayed 1st Amendment rights.

That POS probably will win.

He might but I just want to point out the PP should say that Democrats should figure out what white* voters want. GOP is great at making white people feel victimized and persecuted which is why their messaging does so well with white people.

They want supremacy. That’s what they are voting for with Youngkin

They want the insanity to stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Yikes. There's so much to unpack there. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

This is clearly a very troubled boy with a history of behavior issues. When he was 11 years old he sent nude photos of himself to a girl in fifth grade. The police got involved but the girl's parents decided not to pursue charges as long as he was kept away from their daughter.

And started having sex at 13. “ Accidentally” had anal sex with the Stone Bridge victim. I guarantee that kid has been watching p@rn online for years.

The girl was troubled as well.

The sexualization of children today, by adults, is sad.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Yeah no Jeff I'm not falling for your "where is it in the citation game." Because, as anyone who actually follows history, law and politics knows., there's a lot more to the situation than word-for-word citations. When I introduce other areas of extrinsic knowledge you just discount or debate them, or say "it's not in the citation so it's not relevant."

We're not arguing about the words in the Garland letter. We're arguing about the context.

TLDR, you can't support anything you say but we should just believe it because you use big words.

The content of Garland's memo is that threats and intimidation of elected officials is not acceptable and the FBI will meet with local law enforcement to coordinate a response. Sadly, you are siding with those making the threats.

All I have to say is, I hope you reflect on this when Youngkin wins on Tuesday. The day cannot come quickly enough for Democrats to grow up and realize they need to stop chasing social media trends and figure out what voters want and understand the blow-back of decayed 1st Amendment rights.

That POS probably will win.

He might but I just want to point out the PP should say that Democrats should figure out what white* voters want. GOP is great at making white people feel victimized and persecuted which is why their messaging does so well with white people.

They want supremacy. That’s what they are voting for with Youngkin

Whereas when they voted for Sears, they were voting for black women with guns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Yikes. There's so much to unpack there. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

This is clearly a very troubled boy with a history of behavior issues. When he was 11 years old he sent nude photos of himself to a girl in fifth grade. The police got involved but the girl's parents decided not to pursue charges as long as he was kept away from their daughter.

And started having sex at 13. “ Accidentally” had anal sex with the Stone Bridge victim. I guarantee that kid has been watching p@rn online for years.

The girl was troubled as well.

That's one reason why schools shouldn't put gasoline anywhere near fire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail has a fairly in-depth interview with boy's mother posted this morning:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10156749/Mother-skirt-wearing-teen-raped-female-classmate-says-identifies-male.html

Yikes. There's so much to unpack there. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

This is clearly a very troubled boy with a history of behavior issues. When he was 11 years old he sent nude photos of himself to a girl in fifth grade. The police got involved but the girl's parents decided not to pursue charges as long as he was kept away from their daughter.

And started having sex at 13. “ Accidentally” had anal sex with the Stone Bridge victim. I guarantee that kid has been watching p@rn online for years.

The girl was troubled as well.

That's one reason why schools shouldn't put gasoline anywhere near fire.

Confused by your metaphor . What exactly was the gasoline?