Breaking news: Montgomery Co revises mask order, crushing the hopes of the mask police

[Anonymous]

Persons leaving their residences shall wear a face covering when they are likely to come into contact with another person, such as being within six feet of another person for more than a fleeting time.

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/Resources/Files/health-officer-directive-AM-201124.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Persons leaving their residences shall wear a face covering when they are likely to come into contact with another person, such as being within six feet of another person for more than a fleeting time.

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/Resources/Files/health-officer-directive-AM-201124.pdf

Isn't that what was already in place?

[Anonymous]

Hope it’s picked up by the media otherwise the false message is already out there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Persons leaving their residences shall wear a face covering when they are likely to come into contact with another person, such as being within six feet of another person for more than a fleeting time.

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/Resources/Files/health-officer-directive-AM-201124.pdf

Isn't that what was already in place?

OP here. Should have said Montgomery CLARIFIES order. Most of DCUM was dancing in the streets (alone with their masks on) yesterday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Persons leaving their residences shall wear a face covering when they are likely to come into contact with another person, such as being within six feet of another person for more than a fleeting time.

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/Resources/Files/health-officer-directive-AM-201124.pdf

Isn't that what was already in place?

OP here. Should have said Montgomery CLARIFIES order. Most of DCUM was dancing in the streets (alone with their masks on) yesterday.

Now there will be disagreement over how long a fleeting time is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Persons leaving their residences shall wear a face covering when they are likely to come into contact with another person, such as being within six feet of another person for more than a fleeting time.

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/Resources/Files/health-officer-directive-AM-201124.pdf

Isn't that what was already in place?

OP here. Should have said Montgomery CLARIFIES order. Most of DCUM was dancing in the streets (alone with their masks on) yesterday.

Now there will be disagreement over how long a fleeting time is.

This is only difficult for idiots to understand.

A pass on the sidewalk/path/trail? It doesn't get more fleeting than that.

Nobody is getting covid briefly passing a person from less than 6ft. Absolutely no one.

[Anonymous]

Glad to hear it. That makes a lot more sense than what some folks were claiming yesterday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Persons leaving their residences shall wear a face covering when they are likely to come into contact with another person, such as being within six feet of another person for more than a fleeting time.

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/Resources/Files/health-officer-directive-AM-201124.pdf

Isn't that what was already in place?

OP here. Should have said Montgomery CLARIFIES order. Most of DCUM was dancing in the streets (alone with their masks on) yesterday.

Now there will be disagreement over how long a fleeting time is.

This is only difficult for idiots to understand.

A pass on the sidewalk/path/trail? It doesn't get more fleeting than that.

Nobody is getting covid briefly passing a person from less than 6ft. Absolutely no one.

The earlier PP's statement is still correct. Some will still argue masks are required on sidewalks, and will ignore any post asking them what"fleeting" means to them

[Anonymous]

DC also has a "fleeting" exception, fyi.

I don't know what's hard to get about "maintain social distancing." The word "maintain" = for a period of time. Sustained, prolonged, etc. There's nothing to "maintain" if you are passing someone on a sidewalk in half a second, from 1ft away. You don't get covid passing someone so briefly. If it were that incredibly contagious, we'd all have had it by now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Persons leaving their residences shall wear a face covering when they are likely to come into contact with another person, such as being within six feet of another person for more than a fleeting time.

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/Resources/Files/health-officer-directive-AM-201124.pdf

Isn't that what was already in place?

No. Mask were only required indoors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Persons leaving their residences shall wear a face covering when they are likely to come into contact with another person, such as being within six feet of another person for more than a fleeting time.

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/Resources/Files/health-officer-directive-AM-201124.pdf

Isn't that what was already in place?

No. Mask were only required indoors.

Previously masks were required outdoors where social distancing was not possible. It's almost the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Persons leaving their residences shall wear a face covering when they are likely to come into contact with another person, such as being within six feet of another person for more than a fleeting time.

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/Resources/Files/health-officer-directive-AM-201124.pdf

Isn't that what was already in place?

No. Mask were only required indoors.

Previously masks were required outdoors where social distancing was not possible. It's almost the same thing.

Yes masks were required outdoors if you are in crowds, thanks for the clarification.

It’s not really different, its a clarification.

[Anonymous]

That's too bad about the revised order, my husband and I were looking forward to full enforcement of a zero tolerance policy by any means necessary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That's too bad about the revised order, my husband and I were looking forward to full enforcement of a zero tolerance policy by any means necessary.

What plans did you have in place for confronting the lawless before your hopes were dashed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That's too bad about the revised order, my husband and I were looking forward to full enforcement of a zero tolerance policy by any means necessary.