Hunt Country Tournament

[Anonymous]

Anyone know the spectator restrictions at the Hunt Country Tournament? Thanks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know the spectator restrictions at the Hunt Country Tournament? Thanks

12 per team.

[Anonymous]

Yes 12 per team

[Anonymous]

One parent. Leave siblings, other spouse and other relatives at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One parent. Leave siblings, other spouse and other relatives at home.

that's not what the tournament documentation says

http://fcsc.org/_files/hunt-country-classic/Hunt%20Country%20Fall%20Classic%20COVID%20Related%20Protocols.pdf

[Anonymous]

One parent. Leave siblings, other spouse and other relatives at home.


that's not what the tournament documentation says

http://fcsc.org/_files/hunt-country-classic/Hunt%2...OVID%20Related%20Protocols.pdf

I'm a team manager, and the information I received from the tournament by email said 12 spectators per team, so we are going with that.

[Anonymous]

Why hasn’t Northams order reducing the limit from 250 to 25 affected this tournament?

[Anonymous]

Why hasn’t Northams order reducing the limit from 250 to 25 affected this tournament?

What do you mean? The 25 does not include the players. It is a number of spectators per field. Thus, each side can bring 12 total (or one can bring 13, if you are not worried about fairness).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Why hasn’t Northams order reducing the limit from 250 to 25 affected this tournament?

What do you mean? The 25 does not include the players. It is a number of spectators per field. Thus, each side can bring 12 total (or one can bring 13, if you are not worried about fairness).

It says:
Reduction in public and private gatherings: All public and private in-person gatherings must be limited to 25 individuals, down from the current cap of 250 people. This includes outdoor and indoor settings.

Why would players be excluded?

[Anonymous]

Also the Hunt Country Protocol sheet linked above says the following, which seems outdated:

Spectators shall be limited to a maximum of 2 per player in order to stay below the 250 person
limit per field

[Anonymous]

Why hasn’t Northams order reducing the limit from 250 to 25 affected this tournament?


What do you mean? The 25 does not include the players. It is a number of spectators per field. Thus, each side can bring 12 total (or one can bring 13, if you are not worried about fairness).


It says:
Reduction in public and private gatherings: All public and private in-person gatherings must be limited to 25 individuals, down from the current cap of 250 people. This includes outdoor and indoor settings.

Why would players be excluded?

Have you read the actual sixth amended EO 67? I assume not. Go here, look at it, and see paragraph 13, recreational sports. All your questions will be answered:

https://www.governor.virginia.gov/executive-actions/

[Anonymous]

Also the Hunt Country Protocol sheet linked above says the following, which seems outdated:

Spectators shall be limited to a maximum of 2 per player in order to stay below the 250 person
limit per field

Talk to your team manager or club. The appropriate person will have received the information from the tournament, or should have. If not, reach out to them. We got a clear set of instructions, 12 spectators per team, plus team manager and coach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Why hasn’t Northams order reducing the limit from 250 to 25 affected this tournament?

What do you mean? The 25 does not include the players. It is a number of spectators per field. Thus, each side can bring 12 total (or one can bring 13, if you are not worried about fairness).

Our roster is 17-18 players. So you can’t bring spouse unless you are entitled and don’t care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Why hasn’t Northams order reducing the limit from 250 to 25 affected this tournament?


What do you mean? The 25 does not include the players. It is a number of spectators per field. Thus, each side can bring 12 total (or one can bring 13, if you are not worried about fairness).


It says:
Reduction in public and private gatherings: All public and private in-person gatherings must be limited to 25 individuals, down from the current cap of 250 people. This includes outdoor and indoor settings.

Why would players be excluded?

Have you read the actual sixth amended EO 67? I assume not. Go here, look at it, and see paragraph 13, recreational sports. All your questions will be answered:

https://www.governor.virginia.gov/executive-actions/

Thanks! That answered my question.

Btw I know this is dcum but the snark was really not necessary... I was genuinely trying to figure out how this was permitted, and this answers my question. So thanks!

[Anonymous]

Why hasn’t Northams order reducing the limit from 250 to 25 affected this tournament?


What do you mean? The 25 does not include the players. It is a number of spectators per field. Thus, each side can bring 12 total (or one can bring 13, if you are not worried about fairness).


Our roster is 17-18 players. So you can’t bring spouse unless you are entitled and don’t care.

Ok. I have no idea how spouses came up, but it seems reasonable not to bring them if the roster is that big.